Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Agenda item
Minutes:
The Committee
noted the following amendments presented in the Amendment Sheet namely:
- paragraph 1.8 of the Officer’s report - the overall area
allocated for parking has been increased to cater for the additional cars and
retain two coach parking spaces.
- paragraph 5.7 of the Officer’s report – the Applicant has resolved the
objection received from the Highways Officer through the provision of further
information and the objection has consequently been removed.
- paragraph 5.14 of the Officer’s report – the Sustainability
Officer provided no objection and no recommended conditions.
- paragraph 5.16 of the Officer’s report – the Ecology
Officer provided no objection and no recommended conditions.
- paragraphs 11.11 and 11.12 of the Officer’s report - the
proposed condition (pitch flexibility) has been removed from the proposal.
Through discussions with the Applicant and Sports England, the condition was
deemed too restrictive and given the laying of sports pitches is not considered
development the type and size of playing pitch provided can be altered without
the need for planning permission at any given time.
It is important to
note the existing condition 8 (Playing Field Management and Maintenance Scheme)
will be retained and applied to this or any subsequent permission, to ensure
the playing pitches are effectively managed, whilst condition 7 restricts the
use of the playing fields to outdoor sport only.
Will Cobley (Applicant’s Agent) addressed
the Committee in support of the application.
Councillor Hofman (Ward Councillor for Fen
Ditton and Fulbourn) addressed the Committee about the application.
In response to Members’ questions the Senior
Planner, Strategic Sites Manager said the following:
i.
Confirmed
that condition 31 could be amended to clarify that the ten cycle parking spaces
were additional cycle parking spaces to those which already had planning
permission
ii.
In
response to a query about whether amendments could be made to the Landscape
Management Condition advised that the only conditions which could be considered
under this planning application were conditions 30, 31, 32 and 33.
iii.
In
response to concerns raised by Councillor Hofman (Ward Councillor) around
potential displacement parking, Members were advised that under the Marleigh
Design Code the whole site was to be covered by a controlled parking zone.
Double yellow lines and / or parking bays would be installed prior to
completion of the development.
iv.
An
informative could be added to encourage EV charging points for visitor parking
spaces.
v.
Noted
concerns raised by Members regarding car parking / hard standing areas and
advised a hard and soft landscaping condition would secure details were
submitted post decision.
vi.
Noted
concerns raised around the amount of coach parking. Advice from the Sports and
Recreation Teams at both Councils advised that at junior team level it was not likely
that they would require coaches, and that transport was likely to be by car. An
informative could be added pointing out that coaches could use car parking
spaces (an area could be coned off for additional coach parking).
vii.
The
relevant policy for car parking and cycle parking is TI3 of the South
Cambridgeshire District Council Local Plan 2018. Thirty car parking spaces was
considered acceptable which numerically the County Council Transport Team
supported. An additional ten cycle parking spaces was considered acceptable; the
cycle parking condition could be amended to include cargo bike parking
provision.
The Strategic Sites Manager offered the
following summary of amendments to the Officer’s recommendation; reflecting
Members’ debate during the meeting to approve the s73
application subject to:
i.
the planning conditions and informatives as
detailed in section 24 of the Officer’s report, with delegated authority to
Officers to carry through minor amendments to those conditions and informatives
(and include others considered appropriate and necessary) with:
a.
an amendment to condition 31 to include reference
to the ten cycle parking spaces being additional cycle parking spaces and to
include provision for larger bikes (cargo bikes); and
b.
an informative for the Applicant to consider EV
charging provision for visitor parking spaces; and
c.
an informative to provide that where additional
coach parking was required that car parking spaces could be used; and to
ii.
the prior completion of a planning obligation by
deed under S106 and S106A (as appropriate) of the Town and Country Planning Act
1990 (as amended) which secures the necessary modifications to the 2016
Agreement supporting S/2682/13/OL, to release those obligations no longer
required as a consequence of the approval of this proposal, to the new planning
obligations specified in this report, with delegated authority to Officers to
include other relevant planning obligations necessary to make the proposal
acceptable in planning terms, and to negotiate, settle and complete such
planning obligation in consultation with the Chair and Vice Chair of JDCC.
The Committee:
Resolved (unanimously) to approve the s73 application 24/03837/S73 subject
to:
i. the planning conditions
and informatives as detailed in section 24 of the Officer’s report, with
delegated authority to Officers to carry through minor amendments to those
conditions and informatives (and include others considered appropriate and necessary)
with:
a. an amendment to condition 31 to include reference to the ten cycle
parking spaces being additional cycle parking spaces and to include provision
for larger bikes (cargo bikes); and
b. an informative for the Applicant to consider EV charging provision
for visitor parking spaces; and
c. an informative to provide that where additional coach parking was
required that car parking spaces could be used; and to
ii. the prior completion of a planning obligation by deed under S106 and
S106A (as appropriate) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended)
which secures the necessary modifications to the 2016 Agreement supporting
S/2682/13/OL, to release those obligations no longer required as a consequence
of the approval of this proposal, to the new planning obligations specified in
this report, with delegated authority to Officers to include other relevant
planning obligations necessary to make the proposal acceptable in planning
terms, and to negotiate, settle and complete such planning obligation in
consultation with the Chair and Vice Chair of JDCC.
Supporting documents: