Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Agenda item
Minutes:
Matter for
Decision
The Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014 (“2014 Act”)
gives the Council powers to make Public Space Protection Orders (PSPOs).
The Council has two PSPOs due to lapse in 2022. These are:
i.
The Cambridge City Council Mill Road Cemetery,
Petersfield Green and the front garden at Ditchburn Place, Cambridge Public
Spaces Protection Order 2016, and
ii.
The Public Spaces Protection Order (Touting) 2016.
Before the orders lapse a decision must be made to either extend the
period of the orders for up to three years, to vary or to discharge the orders.
All three decisions will require action by Cambridge City Council.
A consultation on which decision to take has been conducted with the
Police and Crime Commissioner, the local policing body, relevant community
representatives, ward councillors and the owner/occupier of land the PSPOs
cover. Over 92% of respondents supported the extension of the orders.
Whilst reported incidents of prohibited behaviours have significantly
decreased, community groups and councillors remained concerned about
anti-social behaviour re-occurring without the PSPOs in place.
Decision
of Executive Councillor for Open Spaces, Sustainable Food and Community
Wellbeing
i.
Approved extending
both PSPOs for a period of 12 months on the grounds of:
a.
Consultation feedback highlighting
concerns about anti-social behaviour (ASB) re-occurring if the orders were
discharged and evidence of lower levels of prohibited behaviours.
b.
The impact of Covid-19 on social life
in the areas concerned and the potential that behaviour and anti-social
behaviour may resume now that restrictions have been lifted.
c.
The need to address the disparity
between low reporting to the Council and Police and ongoing community concerns
about prohibited behaviours.
ii.
Noted
that, if approved, the extension period would be used to assess if there is
further evidence to warrant a 3-year extension, variation
or discharge of either or both of the PSPOs.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee received a report from the Community Safety Manager.
The Community Safety Manager said the following in response to Members’
questions:
i.
People could report anti-social behaviour to the
City Council anti-social behaviour team if they did not feel comfortable
contacting the police.
ii.
As covid restrictions were lifting, the City
Council was liaising with residents as people anticipated that levels of
anti-social behaviour could rise.
The Committee resolved by 8
votes to 0 to endorse the recommendations.
The Executive Councillor
approved the recommendations.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any
Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest
were declared by the Executive Councillor.
Supporting documents: