Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Agenda item
Minutes:
The Committee received an application for
full planning permission.
The application sought approval for the
erection of a new building comprising E(g) floorspace with car and cycle
parking, landscaping and associated infrastructure.
The Principal Planner updated his report by
referring to updated wording on the amendment sheet.
Pre-Committee amendments to recommendation:
To amend the recommendation at paragraph 201
of the Officer report to read:
GRANT PLANNING PERMISSION subject to:
1. The prior completion of a Section 106
Agreement under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 which includes the Heads
of Terms (HoTs) as set out in section 192 in this report, and any other HoTs or
detail including phasing and triggers, that are still under negotiation. The
final wording of any significant amendments to the HoTs listed in the report to
be agreed in consultation with the Chair and Vice Chair prior to the issuing of
the planning permission;
2. The planning conditions specified in this
report and detailed in Appendix 1 with authority delegated to officers to
include any minor drafting changes thereto; and
3. The relevant informatives as specified in
this report to be included at the discretion of officers.
Mr Child (Agent)
addressed the Committee in support of the application.
The Committee raised the
following concerns in response to the Officer report:
i.
Sufficient space and facilities for bike storage.
ii.
People would have to travel past the site then
double back to access it by bus or cycle. Requested an additional access point
in the north west corner of site.
iii.
Amenity of neighbours.
iv.
Impact on neighbours:
a.
Overlooking.
b.
Overshadowing.
c.
Loss of
light.
d.
Loss of view.
e.
Traffic flow and parking.
v.
Site drainage and SuDS. Concern SuDS would not
drain away water so open space would be lost.
vi.
South side of site should be a green buffer zone but
was now a SWALE. Loss of greenbelt to facilitate another buffer zone.
vii.
Application was just below BREEAM Excellent rating
but should achieve this rating as per City Council and South Cambs District
Council standards.
The Principal Planner said the following in response to Members’
questions:
i.
There were no further details available regarding
light and shadow analysis.
ii.
No significant impact was expected from the balcony
overlooking neighbours.
In response to Members’ questions the Assistant Director said the
application would need to be referred to the Secretary of State for a decision
regarding the loss of green belt issue if it were approved by Committee today.
Councillor Bradnam proposed to the Officer’s recommendation to include
an informative requesting gas assisted two tier bike stands.
Councillor
Thornburrow proposed an amendment to the Officer’s recommendation to include an
informative there should be no occupation on site until there was adequate
sewerage capacity.
The amendments were
not voted on as the item was deferred.
The Committee:
Resolved (by 8
votes to 0) to defer the application to seek further
information to address queries raised at today’s meeting such as light levels
and possibility of limiting terrace access by employees to prevent overlooking
of residential properties.
Supporting documents: