Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Agenda item
Minutes:
The Committee noted the Amendment Sheet as listed
below which could also be viewed at the following link: https://democracy.cambridge.gov.uk/mgChooseDocPack.aspx?ID=3941
1. The
application address does not actually include the wording “1000 Discovery
Drive”, so the officer report is amended accordingly. The address should,
therefore, read, “Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Dame Mary Archer Way,
Cambridge.”
2. There
is an up-date regarding the Phasing Plan, referred to in the officer report in
paragraph 44 (page 10). The contents of the Phasing Plan, as mentioned in the
officer report, have now been agreed and the relevant condition of the outline
planning permission (Condition 6) has now been part discharged.
3. There are slight changes to wording of the
recommended Condition 5. These are:
Point 2, after “Prior to occupation”, insert
“of the building”. After point 4, in the final sentence, change the word
“programme” for “scheme”.
Condition
5 should, therefore, read as follows:
“Prior to the installation of any electrical
services, an electric vehicle charge point scheme demonstrating the provision
of allocated car parking spaces with dedicated electric vehicle charging, shall
be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The
scheme shall include:
1.
Five
active fast electric vehicle charge points with a minimum power rating output
of 22kW to be installed prior to occupation
2. Prior to occupation of the building,
provision shall be made for 23 passive electric vehicle spaces to have the
necessary infrastructure and capacity in the connection to the local
electricity distribution network and electricity distribution board, in order
to facilitate and enable the future installation and activation of additional
active slow electric vehicle charge points as required.
3. The electric vehicle charge points shall
be designed and installed in accordance with BS EN 61851 or as superseded
4. In the event that either no construction work
on Plot 3 (of Phase 2 of the Cambridge Biomedical Campus) or construction of
the Multi-Storey Car Park has commenced within five years of the date of this
decision notice, an additional 31 active slow electric vehicle charge points
with a minimum power rating output of 7kW shall be provided. The additional 31
active slow electric vehicle charge points shall be provided within 6 months
after the expiry of the five years from the date of this decision.
The electric vehicle charge point scheme as
approved shall be fully installed in accordance with the approved scheme and
maintained and retained thereafter.
Reason:
In the interests of encouraging more sustainable modes and forms of
transport and to reduce the impact of development on local air quality, in
accordance with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) paragraph 105,
110, 170 and 181, Policy 36 - Air Quality, Odour and Dust of the Cambridge
Local Plan (2018) and with Cambridge City Council’s adopted Air Quality Action
Plan (2018).”
Andrew Blevins of Liberty Property Trust
(Applicant) addressed the Committee in support of the application.
In response to Members’ questions the
Principal Planning Officer said the following:
i.
In answer
to the representation made by residents of Warburton House:
·
The
property was approximately 280m away from the site; believed the concerns
raised regarding overshadowing were unjustified due to the distance.
·
Outlined
planning permission parameter plans had been set with regards to the height of
the building. The building would fall within those parameters.
ii.
Regarding
the concern expressed to the open space to the north of the building rather
than to the south. This was part of the
staggered arrangement agreed with the outline planning permission.
iii.
The
forecourts of the property were large enough for sufficient sunlight and
daylight.
iv.
The
application proposed a temporary carpark on plot 3. There was a trigger point
within the outline planning permission when the multi-storey would be built to
coincide with plot 3 being developed.
v.
Condition
14 under the outline planning permission required 3% of spaces for EV charging
points at construction with a provision for a further 15% within the
infrastructure.
vi.
Amended
condition 5 (5.4) included an additional 31 active slow electric vehicle charge
points if the temporary cark park was still on site in five years’ time.
vii.
The
Environment Agency had expressed concern at ground contamination and what might
enter the water environment below ground. Their standard informative requested
no open drainage to prevent pollution underground.
viii.
The reason
for the location of the refuse bay (north forecourt) was due to availably of space;
it could not be relocated from the front as there was not enough room to the
east of the building. This would be hidden in a small pavilion building with a
green roof and climbing plants around it.
ix.
Regarding
overheating of the building and the materials used, the south elevation of the
building had less glass and more brick than the north
which was a deliberate design to avoid overheating by sunlight.
x.
The
proposed building was higher than the Abcam building but comparable with other
buildings in the area, some of which were higher.
xi.
The
overall layout of the site had been agreed under the outline planning
permission with the plots divided and staggered north to south to allow large
landscaped areas. The application had a large landscaped area to the north of
the building.
xii.
Noted the concern expressed
regarding the access road going in front of the building.
xiii.
The access
road had to go across the north as to gain vehicle access to the site without
having to reverse back out on Discovery Drive the only practical option was to
loop through the site in front of the building. The Quality Design Panel did
look at the possibility of drop off spaces being provided on Discovery Drive but this was not conducive to good landscape design.
xiv.
Environmental
Health officers had made no adverse comments regarding the 22kw EV charging
points.
xv.
On the
roof of the proposed building there would be a whole section of plant
specifically for cooling the building. In addition, the stairwells on the east
and west side had the space for additional plant for cooling if required.
xvi.
Confirmed
there was a parameter plan that dealt with the flue height of the cooling
plant, the scheme was within that parameter.
xvii.
The
quantity of parking spaces would be controlled by condition 33 of the outline
planning permission of 1 parking space per 80sqm.
xviii.
The
estimation for the number of staff on site was 562 with 80% of staff occupying
the building at any one time.
xix.
As part of
the outline planning permission a site wide travel plan was required and a plot
specific travel plan to promote modes of transport other than the private car.
xx.
Two bus
stops had been installed by the applicant on Dame Mary Archer Way. Two new
cycle and pedestrian crossings had been installed, one on the roundabout on
Addenbrookes Road and Francis Crick Avenue, the other on Dame Mary Archer Way
on the former Bell School site.
xxi.
Noted the
comment regarding the high level of car parking for phase 2.
xxii.
Had been
advised that the electric bike batteries could be taken off and brought into
the office to charge.
xxiii.
The
louvres at the side of the building could be adapted subject to the
requirements of the occupants; the ventilation may be required dependent on
what chemicals or matters were being used in the building.
The
Delivery Manager for Strategic Sites responded with the following:
i.
Highlighted
to the Committee that the sustainability officer said the following: ‘Cooling
hierarchy would be applied to reduce internal solar gains with consideration of
glazing proportions and the passive shading for the building as being features
which has been incorporated in the design to help minimise the heating impact’.
ii.
Thermal
analysis would be undertaken by the applicant considering future and current
climate scenarios reviewing potential heating issues as the development
progressed.
The
Assistant Director (Delivery) said the following:
i.
The S106
Agreement attached to the original outline had rigorous requirements in
relation to the Phase 2 travel plan, which needed to be addressed prior to
occupation. This included the appointment of a travel plan coordinator and
setting up a travel plan coordination group. This would address wider strategic
issues in relation to parking, travel patterns and the development moving
forward.
Councillor Sargeant proposed an additional
informative which was as follows:
That electric bikes could be charged on site.
This informative was carried unanimously.
The Committee:
Resolved
unanimously to approve:
i.
Planning permission of
reserved matters application reference 20/02950/REM, subject to the conditions
and informative set out from page 32 of the agenda pack and with authority
delegated to officers to undertake appropriate minor amendments of those
conditions prior to issue of the planning permission
ii.
Amended condition 5 as
above.
iii.
Additional informative –
Charging electric bikes on site.
Supporting documents: