Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Agenda item
Minutes:
Masterplan Review, West Cambridge Site,
south of Madingley Road
The pre application proposal is for a masterplan review to inform a new outline planning
application for the West Cambridge Campus, at Land south of Madingley
Road. The site is a major new
development for the University of Cambridge for academic and commercial
research, totalling 66 ha in area. The
proposed densified West Cambridge development would
have a total floorspace of 500,280 sq m (by 2031). This is broken down into 257,900sqm academic and 210,386
sqm commercial floorspace. Phase 1 (2021) would provide 284,310 sq m,
composed of 167,159 sq
m of academic floorspace and 92,386 sq m of commercial floorspace.
The extant 1999 masterplan
has been partially implemented. This related to a scheme of 248,272 sq m floorspace in total.
The principal roads through the site have been implemented along with
numerous key buildings and the East and West Forums.
The West Cambridge
campus has been slow to develop, and issues identified as a result of this
include remoteness, isolation, lack of social facilities, high car dependency
and little ‘sense of place’. Car parking
dominates the site and severs the public realm from buildings. The site suffers
from a lack of facilities, although the sports centre has helped start to
readdress this issue over the last 18 months.
Key Points from Developer Presentation
University’s Vision is
for a world class, well connected development which benefits the Cambridge and
United Kingdom economy.
Physical Sciences and Technology – West
Cambridge will be a premier location.
Key Phase 1 –
first major moves to implement the new masterplan
explained, this includes relocation of the Cavendish Laboratory.
Transport Assessment Work – to
date explained. Initial modelling based
on the Cambridge Sub Regional Model (CSRM) was carried out which helped
identify the study area and provided further data.
Transport strategy for Cambridge and
the wider sub-region, including the implications arising from the emerging City
Deal projects is changing and
strategic solutions will be needed to address issues in the future.
Mitigation - Uncertainty
of when strategic transport mitigation will come forward relative to the
indicative phasing assumptions for the build out of this development up to
2031.
Adaptive Phased Approach proposed
to be used to assess the transport impacts of the development. It is a pragmatic solution to allow the
development to come forward. This has previously been used on Alconbury and at Ebbsfleet,
Sheffield sub-region although not previously on any Cambridge schemes.
Process: Key Phases approach –
will allow a reassessment of the development to reflect the current situation
in future on a phased basis.
Open, Transparent, flexible and
deliverable – strategy which can be responsive to future
transport initiatives in the wider region.
Car parking –
proportion of car parking reduced in key phase 1 compared to the approved
outline.
Private Car Journeys –
University Team advise it will be significantly reduced through the Transport
Strategy and secured through the site-wide Travel Plan.
Enhanced Connectivity – bus
routes to the station and orbital routes to be significantly improved.
Public transport and cycling
improvements - to reflect where people will live. This work is currently ongoing.
Programme update –
submission intended later in spring 2016.
Member Questions/Comments
a) North West Cambridge Development (NWCD)
to the north is a mixed use scheme which has inherent benefits. Why is residential accommodation not provided
in this proposal?
-
University needs to balance a range of needs
and priorities. NWCD addresses large
scale need for housing.
-
Providing a critical mass of residential
accommodation at West Cambridge would compromise the overall strategy,
potentially including that of academic needs.
-
The goal for West Cambridge is as a premier
location for physical sciences.
Institutes which will occupy the new masterplan
will have substantial footprint requirements and the floorspace
proposed is needed to satisfy this demand.
-
A shared facilities hub is proposed in the
first phase of development which will provide amenity and activity on campus.
-
The University is committed to a shared
facilities strategy to encourage activity and wider placemaking
objectives.
b) Is the balance of academic and
commercial development correct?
-
The outline application allows for a level of
commercial development suitable to create an ‘address’ for the site to be
competitive with other clusters nationally and globally.
-
The outline permission will allow for a
greater proportion of academic development to come forward if the University’s
intentions for commercial research change in the future.
-
The application will however test the ‘worse
case’ scenario in terms of transport impact.
c) City Deal jobs assumptions do not appear
to reflect current proposals for West Cambridge. Does the scheme rely on City Deal transport enhancements?
-
Proposals for West Cambridge were put forward
before Cambridge City Deal.
-
The emerging Local Plan assumes densification
at West Cambridge with the amount of development to be determined through
development management.
-
The phased adaptive approach allows
flexibility to respond to City Deal initiatives in the future.
-
The transport strategy for West Cambridge
does not rely on City Deal proposals being delivered.
d) The proposals are a major
intensification of the existing campus.
The final scheme will provide approximately 4,300 car parking spaces
generating additional trips /traffic movements which will need to be
accommodated on Madingley Road. Existing University institutes in the City
centre relocating to West Cambridge are likely to be backfilled with other
development. What is the material
migration required?
-
It is accepted that backfilling of existing
sites means that the new proposals are not impact neutral in traffic generation
terms.
-
Phase 1 of the West Cambridge development
will mitigate through alternative travel modes embedded in the transport
strategy.
-
The University is working hard on its wider
estate portfolio to discourage people from driving into Cambridge.
-
Park and cycle will be enhanced.
-
CSRM work was helpful in understanding how
trips redistribute on the network.
Impact on local links need to be carefully examined.
e) Cycle improvements appear to rely on
existing routes /routes secured through the original outline permission which
are inadequate for the purposes of the extent of uplift proposed by the new
application. Does the revised masterplan not require more ambitious plans for delivering
cyclists into the City?
-
It is agreed that cycle routes into the City
are not currently attractive and will need to be improved as part of the
overall transport strategy and travel plan.
-
Cycle streets will be explored through the
mitigation proposals.
-
Grange Road could be a key focus.
-
Mitigation proposals will be shared with
Members at a later session.
f) Links to the NWCD and to the north to
the station are of fundamental importance.
How will connectivity be enhanced?
-
Options for increasing cycle and pedestrian
connectivity to NWCD are being explored.
There are options at High Cross.
-
Cycle bridge or tunnel options are possible,
although there are functional and placemaking
constraints to need to be properly considered.
-
Staggering of the recently installed Toucan
crossings is noted and the impact on continuity of flow for pedestrians either
side of Madingley Road.
g) What are the ‘other’ uses proposed?
-
The other uses relate to the non-academic and
commercial floorspace.
-
These include the sports centre, shared
facilities hub, nursery, retail space and energy centre.
h) How will bus services be improved?
-
Discussions are planned with the bus
operators in the near future.
-
The Uni 4 service,
a requirement of the extant masterplan, will be
enhanced in terms of its route and frequency of service.
-
Frequency of bus services will increase as
the development is built out.
-
Good quality public transport improvements
will be provided based on postcode data of where people live.
-
Enhanced connectivity both to the station(s)
is intended.
i) What is the intended approach to car
park charging?
-
The University’s corporate car parking
strategy is currently under review.
-
West Cambridge will accord with the estate
wide strategy when it is agreed. This could potentially include charging.
j) What is the percentage of car parking
proposed for this development as a proportion of the overall University estate.
-
This information was not available at the
meeting.
-
The developer team to provide a follow up
note.
Supporting documents: