Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Agenda item
Minutes:
1. Apologies – John
Richards (City Council) and Mike Davies (Cambridgeshire County Council)
2. Minutes of the last meeting 16th July
2015 and matters arising.
·
Camsight tandem shelter. CR contacted various manufacturers
following concerns regarding the required size but none offered anything
suitable. Camsight have decided to approach a local
builder for a bespoke shelter. If unsuccessful, Cllr Blencowe suggested ‘Borley Brothers Engineering’ could be approached as a local
firm who have worked for the City Council on a variety of small projects.
·
Station Area. CR
has met with Abellio and Brookgate
regarding additional cycle parking near the station building. This was not
supported due to a management issue. Three more cycle parking blocks have been
added to the existing temporary cycle park with access improved. Network Rail are looking into improving the area outside the Mott
Macdonald building where bikes are randomly parked.
·
ACTION: Cllrs Blencowe and Robertson to continue to
raise cycle parking at their regular contractors’ meetings. (Jonathan Tym of Network Rail has confirmed his attendance at the
next meeting.)
With
random cycle parking likely to continue after the completion of the new cycle
park, the Group agreed there would need to be careful promotion of the new
(free) facility to minimise this as far as possible.
Cllr
Moore highlighted the issue of the various signal control boxes and other
obstacles and trip hazards around the station that makes navigating the area
extremely dangerous for the ambulant disabled and partially sighted.
ACTION: Access officer Mark Taylor to assist in an
audit of the station area in order to explore where short-term improvements can
be made.
·
South East Cycle
route signage. Cllr Robertson had been referring to the route between Mill
Road, Natal Road and Burnside heading into the city. CR confirmed the Tins Path
improvements should be complete by December.
·
ACTION: CR to audit the existing signage of the route
and identify gaps.
3. Promotion Grant Funding
·
Cambridge City
Locality Bicycle Project.
The project would be aimed
at children or young people who may have had difficulties socially or at school
and are risking exclusion. All bikes would be donated, with funding to be used
for young people to train in cycle maintenance with the aim of achieving a
recognised qualification and to pass on their skills to others. Four projects
would be run per year comprising of six sessions with at least four
participants per project. (Total cost £1,427)
The Group’s comments:
Although the outcome of this project is unknown, (and
there was some reservation expressed regarding using City Council funds for a
County-led project) the Group felt this was nevertheless a good concept that
could be of real benefit to young people for relatively little cost.
APPROVED (unanimously) (approx. £5000 remaining in the
budget)
The Group went on to
discuss other potential cycle-related projects.
·
‘Espresso
Library’. Cycle parking provision was proving to be problematic due to Highways
issues according to RdB. Cllr Smart suggested the
café was at a good location for some kind of cycling-related event.
ACTION: CR to check the Highways map and contact
‘Espresso Library’ regarding the cycle parking issue.
·
Cycle parking
provision outside the Queen Edith PH. Cllr Moore with support from the landlord
had sought funding from the Council’s Streets & Open Spaces budgets.
ACTION: CR to discuss Queen Edith PH/Wulfstan Way cycle parking with S&OS Project Leader
John Richards.
·
Thoday Street cycle parking. This was a successful example
of car parking given up for cycle parking according to SN and could be regarded
as a fairer use of parking resource that could be repeated across the city.
Cllr Blencowe stressed the
need to look out for any potential cycle parking opportunities or cycling
promotion ideas. Cllr Moore added there may be scope to installing cycle racks
in areas where bikes parked inappropriately act as obstacles for vulnerable
pedestrians.
·
Park Street Car
Park. As a significant amount of city centre cycle parking will be lost, all
agreed it was worth considering at an early stage where replacement temporary
racks could be provided during the car park’s redevelopment.
4. City Deal Cycle Schemes update (CR)
·
Milton Road and Histon Road cycling improvements. The proposals for
consultation were approved at the last City Deal Board meeting. Consultation
exhibitions will be arranged for January. Options for Milton Road include 2m
wide cycle lanes on both sides of the road. As on Huntingdon Road, trees are
likely to feature heavily in discussions although according to Cllr Smart,
there is an opportunity here to make improvements to the current tree planting
where trees struggle to survive under harsh conditions. Cllr Robertson raised
the issue of the red tarmac used on new cycle lanes which is in short supply
resulting in projects taking considerably longer. Cllr Moore confirmed this had
been raised at South Area Committee.
According to CR, engineers are aware of the supply issue and are looking
into this.
·
Chisholm Trail. A
Member briefing is scheduled tonight, 15th October.
·
Cross City Cycle
Routes. A consultation is scheduled for early in the new year.
·
Cambridge Access
Study. CR expressed her disappointment that the report did not include analysis
of cycle provision for those outside the city travelling in. Full details are
available via the City Deal website www.cambridgeshire.gov.uk/citydeal/
.This is a separate project from the City Centre Access Study.
·
A428
improvements. This is generating considerable interest.
5. City/County Cycling Schemes (CR)
·
Palmer’s Walk
(outside Petersfield Mansions). This is the proposal to widen the footpath where
cycling isn’t banned but isn’t promoted. Residents nevertheless raised concerns
regarding the potential speed of cyclists along what’s regarded by officers as
a non-strategic route. The scheme is being partly funded by ARU
·
Shelford Path. Linking the Guided Busway with Shelford Road. ‘Respect’ signage is proposed to reduce
conflict/increase awareness.
·
City Centre cycle
parking. The new racks for Guildhall Street should be installed before
Christmas. The racks installed incorrectly outside Sainsbury’s, Sidney Street
are to be turned around.
·
Queen Ann Car
Park. One of the worst areas for cycle theft in the city. Although the car park
has a finite lifespan, some improvements can be made including improved CCTV
coverage and lighting.
·
Green Dragon
Bridge. The ‘do minimum’ option was the most popular, especially considering
the proposal for the new bridge further down the river next to the railway
bridge. Work was proposed to be undertaken in the Spring/Summer 2016 although
this would depend on the application for works under section 38 of the Common’s
Act and the timing of the TRO advertisement for the double yellow lines on
Water Street.
·
One-way streets.
SN stressed that the Cycling Campaign were supportive of this project as it
gives cyclists in areas with high levels of contraflow legal protection as
vulnerable road users. (Coronation Street has been removed from the project due
to its narrowness and significant volumes of traffic.) Officers during the next
phase will be focussing on the narrower; more challenging streets in the Romsey
and Newtown area. Cllr Smart highlighted Emmanuel Road as a particularly
dangerous area as cycle lanes are often crossed by cars and buses during busy
periods. SN stressed the need to update existing signage which did not all reflect the newly permitted cycle contraflow
streets. Making all streets 2-way would be welcomed by the Campaign according
to SN. .
6. Any Other Business.
·
Emmanuel/Parker
Street bus station junction. A particularly difficult area for the disabled as
there are no pick-up/drop off areas (Cllr Moore)
·
Darwin Green
local centre and primary school. There are no plans for a school crossing, only
a raised table. This is due to the road being categorised as a ‘local’ road
despite being a key linkage between Huntingdon Road and Histon
Road.
7. Date of next meeting – 25/2/16