Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Agenda item
Minutes:
The Committee received a report from the Planning Policy Manager, South Cambridgeshire District Council (SCDC) regarding
the Memorandum of Understanding.
The report outlined the close functional
relationship between Cambridge and South Cambridgeshire that has long been
recognised in planning terms. Changes in circumstances since the submission of
the Local Plans indicate that a Memorandum of Understanding between the
Councils will demonstrate the soundness of the plans and is in accordance with
the on-going duty to co-operate.
The
Joint Strategic Transport and Spatial Planning Group (JST&SPG) was asked to
consider a Memorandum of Understanding between Cambridge City Council and South
Cambridgeshire District Council which confirms the agreement between the
Councils. Comments made at this meeting would be then reported to both Councils
Councillor Kindersley sought clarification regarding how soon the
Memorandum of Understanding would take effect and asked if it would work. He
questioned how much lobbying of Ministers had taken place. He expressed
concerns regarding what steps had been taken to protect the planned future
development in the area and to protect that vision from opportunistic
development.
The Planning Policy Manager
responded and suggested that this was a ground breaking approach. However, it
would not have an impact until it had been tested alongside the Local Plans.
Legal advice had stated that a good case could be made for a joint approach.
Councillor
Kindersley stated that he was disturbed that the Planning Inspectorate had not
given a clearer steer on this matter. In addition he suggested that local
members of Parliament should also be pressuring for urgent action. He suggested
that relevant portfolio holders be asked to do what they could to influence the
Planning Inspectorate to take on board the Memorandum of Understanding. He
stated that they should highlight that this was time critical due to
development plans in the pipeline.
Officers confirmed
that the same inspector would be looking at both local plans. Officers stated
that the Memorandum of Understanding would be incorporated into the relevant
hearing statements for the examination and be presented at an early stage of
the examination.
Councillor Wotherspoon suggested that the pre-hearing meeting should
clarify priorities and the Inspector might bring forward housing supply matters
and issue an interim statement. Ministerial recognition had already been given
to this approach.
Councillor Herbert
stated that there would be opportunities for dialogue with the Inspector. The
Inspector needed to make judgements on the ability to meet housing needs.
In response to
Members questions, officers confirmed that the boundaries with other
authorities had been considered.
Councillor Kindersley
expressed concerns that applications considered now, such as recent cases in Waterbeach, left the council in a position where they had
no policy in place to support a rejection. Officers confirmed that the
Inspector had been made aware of the need for urgent recognition of the
Memorandum of Understanding.
Councillor Jenkins
suggested that a more comprehensive list of actions was needed in order to be
ready for the next steps.
Members agreed
that the next step would be a public statement on the joint approach being
adopted.
Resolved (unanimously)
Members considered
the report and advised Cambridge City Council and South Cambridgeshire District
Council that they:
Support the adoption of Memorandum of Understanding between Cambridge City Council and South Cambridgeshire District Council – Greater Cambridge Housing Trajectory as set out in Appendix 1 of the Officers report.
Supporting documents: