Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Agenda and minutes
Venue: Committee Room 2, The Guildhall, Market Square, Cambridge, CB2 3QJ. View directions
Contact: Graham Saint Strategy Officer
No. | Item | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apologies Minutes: Apologies were received from Mike Hay, Rachel Harrison and County Councillor Paul Sales. |
|||||||||||||||||
Public Questions Minutes: There were no public questions. |
|||||||||||||||||
Change to Published Agenda Order Minutes: Under paragraph 4.2.1 of the Council Procedure Rules, the Chair used his discretion to alter the order of the agenda items. However, for ease of the reader, these minutes will follow the order of the agenda. |
|||||||||||||||||
To approve the minutes of the meeting held on the 13th September 2012. Minutes: The minutes were agreed as a correct record subject to the following correction: · Councillor Smart to be added to those present. |
|||||||||||||||||
Actions outstanding from the last meeting:
http://www.cambridgeshire.gov.uk/CMSWebsite/Apps/Committees/AgendaItem.aspx?agendaItemID=5981
Minutes: Actions from previous meeting:
|
|||||||||||||||||
UPDATE ON THE WORK OF THE SHADOW HEALTH AND WELLBEING BOARD (SHWB BOARD) PDF 84 KB The minutes of the SHWB Board meeting held on
11 October 2012 are attached. A draft agenda for the next meeting on 16 January
2013 is also attached. Members are invited to comment on the work of the Board
and to identify issues where local contributions can be made. Now that the Health and Wellbeing Strategy is
in place the process of planning actions that will deliver its objectives has
begun. A paper showing how the actions will be developed is attached. Jas Lally
will outline how the Cambridge Local Health Partnership can contribute to this
process and set it’s own priorities. A paper "Agreeing our Local
Priorities" is attached. Additional documents:
Minutes: Liz Robin updated the panel on the work of the SHWB. Multi
agency funding bids had been largely successful. An action plan was under
development to deliver the 6 key
priorities in the new strategy, as detailed in the report. The Partnership welcomed the inclusion of mental health as a high priority. The development of a robust action plan would create a large workload. The Partnership also welcomed the completely new area of working jointly with the Armed Forces. Councillor Smart suggested consulting the Covenant Board. |
|||||||||||||||||
A Workshop was held on 22 November looking at information
flows and communication between local GP’s and Housing Officers. A number of
case studies were used to help prompt discussions. The workshop papers are attached. Jas Lally will highlight some of the areas of focus in the workshop, the agreed actions to emerge and what will happen next. Minutes: Jas Lally stated that the workshop had been well attended
and useful. GP’s reported an improved understanding of the pressures and
limitation of the housing department. Welfare reform had been highlighted as a
key issue for the future. An action
list had been agreed and would be brought to this meeting in the near future. The workshop was agreed to have been a useful activity and a
repeat session, in six months time, was suggested to see what improvements
could be implemented. |
|||||||||||||||||
AGEING WELL AND COMMUNITY NAVIGATORS PDF 120 KB This is an opportunity for members to talk to the Community Navigator covering Cambridge about their initial views about existing activity for older people in the City and how they have started to build up a local network. Members reserved judgement about the need for a new Forum in the City and wanted to ask stakeholders their views first, taking into account present partnership working. Minutes: Louise Peden (City Community Navigator) outlined the
Navigator programme. There were five navigators across the County and their
brief was to map out the networks and services avaialble to older people in
local areas. They would then provide
signposting service and seek to build upon the networks to increase the
capacity of local communities to support older people and maintain their
independence. They would also train volunteers to become local navigators for
their communities. Interest was growing. Key issues were noted as:
i.
The need for a good induction programme to ensure a
consistent standard.
ii.
Motivated and skilled volunteers, who were aware of
their limitations.
iii.
Local knowledge.
iv.
Raising awareness of the Your Life, Your Choice
website. The Partnership made the following comments and suggestions:
v.
Making best use of links already in place.
vi.
Contacting the sheltered Housing Residents Association.
vii.
Ensuring all contact information is up to date.
viii.
Using exiting newsletters and publication to spread
awareness.
ix.
Using the local knowledge of networks such as Friends
of … groups.
x.
Placing the navigators in GP surgeries for special
sessions such, as flu inoculations, where older people were likely to attend. The Partnership discussed using the Council’s Diversity
Forum to consult local stakeholders about the need for a CambridgeAgeing Well
Forum. The Diversity Forum is only held twice a year and the next meeting was
six months away. Memebers felt there was a lot of good joint working going on
in Cambridhge and that events held by other groups such as COPE, could explore how an Aging Well Forum might
contribute. Sally Roden said that she would meet with the local Community
Navigators to make sure that they were aware of existing networks and
contacts. The panel said that it would
look again at this issue once the local Community Navigator had got a feel for
the Cambridge situation, so that any decision to set up an Aging Well Forum was
better informed. Action: Sally Roden There was also concern that frail, elederly, people who were presently isolated and removed from existing networks would only come to notice when they presented to GP’s at a point of a crisis. The Partnership felt that additional work was required to help identify these people and that this could be considered in any future Community Navigator report. |
|||||||||||||||||
JOINT COMMISSIONING STRATEGY FOR THE MENTAL HEALTH AND WELL-BEING OF ADULTS OF WORKING AGE PDF 48 KB Members are asked to give their initial views on this developing strategy. A summary of its purpose and scope is attached. This item is intended for information as scrutiny of this strategy is taking place elsewhere. Members may wish to give their initial views. Additional documents: Minutes: This item had been included on the agenda for information and the Partnership was asked how they wished to approach this subject. The following points were raised: i. This matter is under discussion elsewhere. ii. The approach is unclear, was it a medical issues or something wider? iii. Was funding in the correct place? iv. Should the focus be in prevention (linked to improved social care) or treatment? v. There was a discrepancy between the national and local agenda on this matter. vi. How helpful was it to divide the issues along age lines when this was a whole life issue? vii. Physical health was also linked to mental health. The Partnership agreed to keep this item on the Forward Plan
in order to keep abreast of developments and work taking place elsewhere. |
|||||||||||||||||
A copy of the Panel’s Forward plan is at attached. Members are invited to consider the issues they wish to discuss at future meetings. Minutes: The Partnership agreed the following Forward Plan:
Action: Jas Lally
and Rachel Harmer in consultation with Tom Dutton regarding developing the
Partnership’s contribution towards the SHWB’s action plan. Action: Graham Saint to draft a paper showing
suggested priorities forthe Partnership – so that this can be circulated wider
amongst local stakeholders, to show what the Partnership is doing and going to
do. |
|||||||||||||||||
Date of Next Meeting The next meeting is scheduled for 10 January 2012, starting at 12 noon. Minutes: Future meeting dates to be agreed by email. |