Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Agenda and minutes
Venue: Council Chamber, The Guildhall, Market Square, Cambridge, CB2 3QJ [access the building via Peashill entrance]. View directions
Contact: Democratic Services Committee Manager
No. | Item |
---|---|
Appointment of a Chair Minutes: |
|
Declarations of Interest Minutes: No declarations of interest were made. |
|
Meeting Procedure Minutes: |
|
Tesco, East Road, Premises Licence PDF 460 KB Additional documents:
Minutes: An application under section 17 of the Licensing Act 2003 to apply for a
Premises Licence for the sale by retail of alcohol with respect to Tesco, 172
East Road Cambridge CB1 1BG was received from Tesco Stores Limited. The Environmental Health and Licensing Support Team Leader presented
the report and outlined the application. Applicant’s Representative i.
Tesco Express stores were the
smallest format of store Tesco operated: a.
This type of store was to service
those living or working in the local area and were typically looking to
purchase their next 2 -3 meals. b.
The type of alcohol sold in these
stores was carefully considered. The majority of the
offer was red and white wine, a limited spirit range (5-6), beers, lagers and
ciders. Unless it was a craft beer, these would not be sold in less than 4
packs. This was done with the consideration of street drinking. ii.
Tesco tended to introduce measures
regarding the retail sale of alcohol which other companies followed. iii.
Several things had changed since
the last premises licence application was made: a. During
the covid pandemic several customers had commented that they were disappointed
that the store did not sell alcohol. b. Other
Tesco stores had been granted premises licences i.e.: at Christ Lane in 2019
and Petty Cury in 2022. Both stores had limited licensable hours and extensive
conditions and the Police as responsible authority had not objected to them.
These stores could be considered to face more challenges being in the city
centre. In advance of the meeting the applicant checked with the Licensing Team
who had advised that both stores had no record of complaints against them. c. Tesco
had employed a Licensing Consultant (who had previously worked in the Police
with extensive experience in Licensing and a number of
qualifications in crime prevention) to undertake research / observations prior
to the submission of the application. The observations were undertaken to
whether if the premises was granted a premises licence if it would be likely
that it would add to the cumulative impact. This led to discussions with the
Police who indicated that that they would be comfortable with an application
provided all conditions were met. iv.
A premises licence application was
submitted and none of the statutory authorities objected to the application;
these being the responsible bodies who would deal with issues that might affect
issues of cumulative impact. v.
There was a historical
relationship between Tesco’s Licensing Manager and Jimmy’s. Discussions had
taken place regarding the licensable hours and appropriate conditions. Jimmy’s had not objected to the application. vi.
The local school had not objected.
vii.
The licensable hours applied for
had had regard to the location of the premises. viii. Tesco operated a ‘Think 25’ policy and were the first to introduce age limits on the purchase of alcohol. A till prompt in relation to the ‘Think 25’ policy would arise on any sale of alcohol. The till would generate a prompt to help employees ... view the full minutes text for item 24/17/Lic |