Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Agenda and minutes
Venue: Committee Room 1 & 2, The Guildhall, Market Square, Cambridge, CB2 3QJ. View directions
Contact: Democratic Services Committee Manager
No. | Item |
---|---|
Appointment of a Chair Minutes: |
|
Declarations of Interest Minutes: No declarations of interest were made. |
|
Meeting Procedure Minutes: |
|
Private Hire Operators Licence Renewal Application PDF 395 KB Additional documents:
Minutes: The Committee received a report from the Technical Licensing
Officer concerning the renewal application of the private hire operator’s
licence for Uber Britannia Ltd (UBL) in Cambridge. The Technical Licensing Officer went through
the report in detail with the Committee, a copy of which could be viewed at the
following link (pages 5 to 11): https://democracy.cambridge.gov.uk/mgChooseDocPack.aspx?ID=3314 In response to a question from the Committee
the Technical Licensing Officer confirmed it was not unusual for a private hire
company to be licensed with more than one authority. Before any further discussion took place, Asitha Ranatunga, Barrister,
representing Cambridge City Council, recommended the Committee consider a
confidential paper submitted by UBL (a redacted copy had been made available in
the public domain). The report contained exempt information
during which the public and press were likely to be excluded from the meeting
subject to determination by the Committee following consideration of a public
interest test. This exclusion would be
made under paragraph 3 of Part 1 of Schedule 12A of the Local Government Act
1972. Resolved (unanimously) to exclude the press and public if and when agreed confidential items of the additional report needed to be discussed. Philip Kolvin QC
then provided a summary of the UBL submission by outlining the following about
the Applicant:
i.
Had a good operating history in Cambridge.
ii.
Had a good relationship with Cambridge City
Council.
iii.
Was popular amongst its customers.
iv.
Held a good safety record.
v.
Had no complaints from its customers to the Council.
vi.
Was ready, willing and able to make changes when
required by the Cambridge City Council. vii.
Agreed to all conditions proposed in Appendix I
(p117) of the agenda pack. viii.
The Directors of UBL (both DBS checked) were of
impeccable character whose job was to ensure that Uber was a cooperative and
compliant licencee. The Committee were informed that UBL agreed
with the policy approach undertaken by Cambridge City Council, emphasising
section 5 Policy Consideration and section 6 Options of the Officer’s report. Fred Jones advised the Committee that UBL
had been working with the City Council’s enforcement team to resolve any issues
that had occurred in the twelve month period. This was exemplified by moving
the pickup point at Cambridge City Railway Station further away from Hackney
Carriage vehicles with clear instructions to drivers on where they can and
can’t park. After providing a working history, business
model and technology model of Uber, Philip Kolvin QC
explained that he would give a response to the objections made as highlighted
in the agenda and additional papers to the agenda pack:
i.
He referred to the list of considerations posed by
Transport for London’s (TfL) licensing decision on page 45 of the agenda. ·
Highlighted Uber’s commitment to working with the
police and reporting any known criminal offences. Referenced the second
condition on page 117 of the agenda. · The approach to undertaking medical checks had changed from using the online ’Push Doctor’ service to ensuring each driver saw a ... view the full minutes text for item 17/27/Lic |