Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Agenda and minutes
Venue: Committee Room 1 & 2, The Guildhall, Market Square, Cambridge, CB2 3QJ. View directions
Contact: Toni Birkin Committee Manager
| No. | Item |
|---|---|
|
Appointment of a Chair Minutes: Councillor Owers was appointed as Chair for the meeting. |
|
|
Declarations of Interest Minutes: Councillor Pippas declared a personal interest as the premises were in his Ward (Queen Edith’s). |
|
|
Meeting Procedure Minutes: All parties noted the meetings procedure. |
|
|
Queen Edith P.H, Wulfstan Way, Cambridge, CB1 8QN Additional documents:
Minutes: The Committee received an application for a premises licence for
the Queen Edith P.H., Wulfstan Way, Cambridge.
The Assistant Licensing Officer outlined the application as detailed in the
report. In response to Members’ questions the Assistant Licensing Officer stated:
i.
The premises are located further forward in the
site footprint than the unit it replaced but it is still set back from the
road.
ii.
The rear gardens of properties on Queen Edith’s way
were the nearest neighbours.
iii.
Retirement properties in the area were separated
from the site by either shops or the road and long front gardens.
iv.
Opening hours were not covered by the Licensing
Act. Applicant’s Agents Mr Naisby made the following points on behalf
of the Applicant:
v.
Individual Pubs now has six premises, three of
which were located in Cambridge.
vi.
The business model is based on Community Pubs and
they seek to be good neighbours. vii.
The objections received mainly refer to the evening
opening hours requested for Friday and Saturday nights. viii.
The extended opening time period allowed an hour
for drinking up which in turn resulted in a ‘soft’ cut off period. This reduces
the numbers of customers exiting the premises at any one time and therefore
reduces noise and disturbance. Member Questions In response to Members’ questions, Mr Naisby made the following statements:
ix.
The timing requested for New Year’s Eve were
standard wording. It was not anticipated that the venue would be open for the
full period permissible.
x.
Other premises they owned in Cambridge were also in
residential areas and had not caused any problems for neighbours.
xi.
The two flats above the premises were expected to
be let to the Landlord and other members of staff. xii.
The business plan was based on the proposed opening
hours. A reduction in the hours would have a significant impact on the
viability of the premises. The previous Public House on this site had closed as
it was unviable. xiii.
Until the premises were open for business, it was
not possible to predict how much trade was done in the late evening periods.
Sales logs from other premises were available. Summing Up All parties agreed that relevant points had been covered. Members withdrew at 10.25 am and returned at 12.05 pm. Whilst retired, and having made their decision, Members
received legal advice on the wording of the decision. Decision The Sub Committee unanimously resolved to grant the application as applied for, including the conditions proposed
by the police, environmental health and Trading Standards, and a further condition
which stipulates that the contact number of the designated premises supervisor
be provided to local residents and displayed prominently at the entrance both
to the public house and its car park, in order to ensure that instances of
public nuisance can be addressed. |