Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Minutes
Proposed venue: Committee Room 2, The Guildhall, Market Square, Cambridge, CB2 3QJ. View directions
Contact: Clare Rankin Cycling and Walking Officer
No. | Item |
---|---|
Minutes of Last Meeting and Matters Arising Minutes: Apologies – Mike Davies, Roxanne
de Beau and Anthony French ACTION: Cllr Tim
Moore to confirm his continued membership of the Group. 1. Welcome and
introductions. Cllr
Blencowe (KB) described the function of the Group as advisory, intended to
inform Committees such as Environment Scrutiny Committee. Regarding bringing
any potential agenda items before the Group, Cllrs are recommended to approach
CR in the first instance who will discuss the item with KB. The City and County
updates on the agenda are standard items. ACTION: CR to circulate
the Steering Group Terms of Reference with the minutes. 2. Notes of the last
meeting 25th February 2016 and matters arising. Notes
agreed. ·
Tins
Path signage (CR). The ‘Greenways’ project which includes Tins Path could
become a City Deal project and therefore be eligible for significant funding.
The path has been earmarked for improvement for some time and is a well-used
cycle and pedestrian route. 3. Palmer’s Walk. JR
had circulated the background report in advance. Palmer's Walk links Mill Rd with
Bradmore Street. The existing path is 1.2m wide and a
proposal to widen the path went out to local consultation in August last year.
Views received were split but ultimately the decision was taken to proceed. A
local residents' group subsequently raised concerns about the decision which
resulted in an ICI investigation. This concluded that the consultation should
have been more extensive with alternative options provided. Officers now need
to explore if there is still an appetite to consider widening the path. If so,they will need to repeat the
consultation process and conduct it more thoroughly this time. KB
remarked that this proposal had originally been raised several years ago at an East
Area Committee by a representative of the Petersfield Mansions Residents
Association at the time. The path is currently regarded by some users as not being wide enough to
accommodate the different uses and moreover the stretch of grass alongside the path
becomes muddy and treacherous in poorer weather. Funding had latterly been
found and agreed and a consultation on the proposed widening conducted. Issues
regarding the consultation process were subsequently raised by the current
membership of the Petersfield Mansions Residents'Association
and referred to the ICI.Points highlighted in the ICI
report have been accepted. There
is still a pledge of part-funding from ARU.The
general view from ward councillors is that the proposal should still be
considered. JR
stressed that should the group decide to proceed with reconsideration of the
proposal that it should be within the context of other routes in the area.CR
added that although the path is not a signed cycle route,there is no by-law to ban cycling along this popular
desire line. The
group agreed that if the project was to be taken forward that local views
needed to be reflected and that all points highlighted by the ICI needed to be
addressed. LW addressed the group. She said most people questioned during the survey opposed the widening of the path. There ... view the full minutes text for item 16/8/MCPSG |