Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Agenda and minutes
Venue: via Microsoft Teams
Contact: Email: helen.crowther@cambridge.gov.uk Equality and Anti-Poverty Officer
Note: If you are not a member of the Panel but are interested in joining to observe the meeting, please contact Helen Crowther, Equality and Anti-Poverty Officer, on 01223 457046 or helen.crowther@cambridge
No. | Item |
---|---|
Welcome, Introductions and Apologies Minutes: Apologies were
received from: Elected members:
Councillors Jennifer Page-Croft and Martin Smart Public members:
Raheela Rehman Staff members: Joe
Obe |
|
Declarations of Interest Minutes: No interests were declared. |
|
Minutes of Previous Meeting and Matters Arising PDF 237 KB Minutes: The minutes of the meeting of the 7th July 2020
were approved and signed as an accurate record. |
|
Public questions Minutes: There were no public questions. The ordering of items on the agenda was changed to ensure that Cllr Thittala who proposed the Black Lives Matter motion could be present for this item however, for ease of the reader, these minutes will follow the order of the published agenda. |
|
Black Lives Matter motion PDF 130 KB (Helen Crowther, Equality and Anti-Poverty Officer) Minutes: Helen Crowther, Equality and Anti-Poverty Officer, provided a
presentation on the Black Lives Matter motion and progress of the council in
meeting some actions in the motion. She shared: ·
This
was a cross-Party motion agreed at Full Council on 16th July.
Councillor Thittala proposed the motion and Councillor Porrer seconded it – the
councillors are both members of the Equalities Panel. ·
The
motion expresses support for Black Lives Matter and acknowledges that much more
is needed to be done to tackle structural and individual racism and welcomes
the council’s role as a public leader to spearhead this work locally. ·
Updates
on progress relating to actions in the motion include: o
All
councillors are required to attend an Equality and Diversity briefing in the
first year of their term and two dates were provided for councillors in 2020.
The briefing was also recorded. In addition to this, councillors attended
Gypsy, Roma, and Traveller cultural awareness training. o
The
motion shares that the council will identify actions to increase recruitment
and retention of BAME staff as part of its next Single Equality Scheme and help
promote voices of BAME staff. The Equality in Employment item provided an
update related to recruitment and retention. A BAME staff group has been set up
as a safe space for BAME staff to share their experiences of being from ethnic
minority backgrounds and raise any issues.
A separate meeting was also held for all staff who felt impacted by
issues raised by the Black Lives Matter protests and George Floyd’s death in
the summer. A further meeting for all staff on race equality would take place
on 5th February, which would also be an opportunity to consult staff
on how the council can promote race equality as part of its new equalities strategy. o
The
Director of Public Health was due to present a report at the Environment and
Community Scrutiny Committee on 28th January on the impact of
Covid-19 on BAME communities in Cambridge. The report going to Committee
demonstrates that Bangladeshi, Indian and Pakistani communities are
disproportionately impacted when looking at contraction rates from September to
27 December (13.8% of those tested positive for coronavirus where they make up
4.8% of the population according to the last Census). Hospital data shows that
BAME people are more likely to be admitted but that there is no difference in
death rates compared to White British people. o
The
council is working with the Food Poverty Alliance to raise awareness of how
people in food poverty have specific religious, health or cultural
requirements. A meeting was held with Cambridge City Foodbank, Cambridge Ethnic
Community Forum, and the Karim Foundation. From this meeting the Foodbank
agreed to look into if there are further organisations
supporting BAME communities who might issue food vouchers and consider the
diversity of food on offer at the Foodbank. o
The
Office for the Police and Crime Commissioner has been asked to report on the
measures to eliminate the disproportionality of BAME people affected by the use of stop and search. There was a Business
Coordination Board meeting held by the police in December at which it was
announced that there will be an Independent Use of Force Scrutiny Group. The
minutes of the meeting discussing the action in detail were still to be
published. o
Cambridge
Ethnic Community Forum has been commissioned by the council to produce a race
equality toolkit by the end of February. o
Cambridge
City Council organised a meeting on 22nd October in order to enhance
dialogue between existing local BAME community groups, the City Council, and
other local public service organisations. The meeting discussed policing and
stop and search, how we celebrate different cultures as a city, and the
disproportionate impact of Covid-19 on BAME communities. o
One
action arising from the 22 October meeting was for the police to share details
of the Independent Use of Force Scrutiny Group with the community group members
who may wish to be involved. Another action was for Cambridge City Council to
explore further means to celebrate Black cultures in its annual events like the
Mela and/ or arrange something for August to mark the abolition of slavery. Panel members were invited to ask questions and/ or provide feedback on
how the Council may further work on actions in the motion: ·
One
Panel Member said that conversations on race equality needed to be kept open
and that the council could also consider how younger voices are heard . ·
A
Panel member and Councillor who attended the Gypsy, Roma, and Traveller
cultural awareness training said that it was excellent. ·
Panel
members shared it was really important to keep chasing
the police to more fully understand outcomes from their meeting in December and
what they are doing about disproportionality in stop and search rates for BAME
people compared to White British people. ·
A
Panel member asked how the council is communicating the information from the
report with BAME communities and commented on the importance of taking action to support the communities given that 13.8% of
positive cases of coronavirus were from Bangladeshi, Indian and Pakistani
people. They asked if we are awaiting further detail on this before action is
taken. ·
Building
on action taken around the motion, it was suggested that the council also meet
with and consult voluntary and community sector groups representing Asian
communities, especially given the information that Bangladeshi, Indian and
Pakistani communities are disproportionately likely to test positive for
coronavirus. In response to these comments and questions, officers said the
following: ·
Helen
Crowther will talk to the Children and Young People’s Participation Service
around how we may consult with young people on promoting race equality and
tackling discrimination in the city. Suzanne Hemingway, Strategic Director,
commented that in the October meeting with the public sector and community
groups, there were people from a range of ages representing the community
groups. It was also helpful for community groups to learn more about what the
other community groups work on. ·
Helen
Crowther confirmed that the council will continue to ask the police for further
information on action taken around disproportionality of stop and search for
BAME communities. ·
The
information from the Public Health report will be shared with voluntary and
community sector groups supporting BAME people, including Cambridge Ethnic
Community Forum and their member organisations. ·
Ariadne
Henry, Community Development Officer, shared that herself and two other
officers in Community Services have been working with Bangladeshi and South Asian
communities throughout the pandemic to share Public Health messaging. Learning
from Peterborough City Council is that word of mouth is the best means of
communicating with ethnic minority groups. Some ways we have been keeping in
touch with communities include regular conversations with the mosques, Gurdwara
and members of the Hindu community, and bi-weekly communications with Asian
women’s groups. ·
Suzanne
Hemingway and Helen Crowther agreed that the council will consult with
voluntary and community sector groups supporting Asian communities as part of
the process of consulting on the next Single Equality Scheme. |
|
Equality in Employment End of Year Workforce Update: April 2019 - March 2020 PDF 176 KB (Deborah Simpson, Head of Human Resources) Minutes: Deborah Simpson, Head of Human Resources, shared key information with
the Panel from the Equality in Employment End of Year Workforce Report: ·
At
31st March 2020, 48.49% of our staff were female compared to 51.51%
male. This has been consistent since 2016 and is different from other local
authorities, particularly unitary and county level where typically their
workforce profile is 70% female. ·
There
was no gender pay reporting for 2020, as this was not required by the
government due to the pandemic, but we shall report on this in 2021. ·
45
to 54 is the most common age group working for the council. ·
44.62%
of the workforce has worked at the council for 10 years or more. ·
7.54%
of staff declare themselves as BAME – compared to the council’s target of 9.5% ·
7.13%
of staff declared themselves as disabled – compared to the council’s target of
7.5% ·
The
targets for proportion of BAME and disabled staff as a percentage of the
workforce will remain the same. The 2021 Census will be a useful benchmark to
set these targets going forward. ·
BAME
representation has increased across the pay bands and is now higher in Bands 3,
4, 6 and 8 than in 2019. ·
The
report identifies actions the council has undertaken to help improve
representation of BAME staff members, including by helping a BAME staff group
to set up and commissioning unconscious
bias training for Council staff. ·
Cambridge
City Council continues to be a Disability Confident employer ·
An
increasing number of staff declare their sexuality as
lesbian, gay, bisexual or questioning – 4.47% (up by 12 people since 2019). ·
The
council ran Management Development Programme training, and this was attended by
a higher percentage of disabled people and women than the percentage of
disabled people and women in the workforce profile. ·
In
relation to recruitment, the number of applications received from disabled
people as a percentage of all applications received was 10.72%. This is an
increase of 4.25% from the previous year. For BAME people this was 29.22%, (an
increase of 8.69% from the previous year) and analysis shows that we are
attracting BAME people’s applications to roles in a wide variety of service
areas. The percentage of BAME people’s applications that were successful was
12.64%. ·
12%
of promotions were from individuals declaring themselves as from a BAME
background – up by 5% on 2019. ·
Most
apprentices are male (24 compared to 14 female) and 10% of apprentices are
BAME, and 13% have a disability. Panel members provided feedback on the report and asked some questions: ·
Three
Panel members shared that they felt the report was much easier to read than it
has been in previous years due to the use of graphics. ·
One
Panel member asked if it was possible to look at staff take-up of staff
parental leave. ·
The
Panel were interested to know more about the different ways that the council
supports flexible working, including during the pandemic. ·
A
Panel member shared that trends related to workforce representation were encouraging
and asked how the council will set its targets going forward and how ambitious
the council ultimately plans to be in this. In relation to queries on flexible working, Suzanne Hemingway,
Strategic Director, shared that employees will be working differently following
learning from the pandemic in relation to flexible working practices. Deborah
Simpson, Head of Human Resources, reflected that the pandemic had led to
significant changes in flexible working and managers have been encouraged to
support their staff in this. Due to this support from managers, the council has
had very little need e to furlough staff with childcare responsibilities. In answer to the other queries above, Deborah Simpson said: · The council will be able to report on
take-up of shared parental leave in its Equality in Employment report from
April 2021, as the new HR system shall make this possible. · The targets for representation of
BAME people and disabled people as a percentage of the workforce will be
reconsidered related to data from the 2021 Census. The council is quietly
ambitious and optimistic that it will be able to reach current targets. · In relation to BAME people’s
representation, TUPE transfers have masked some progress towards meeting
targets. TUPE involves transferring staff to another organisation whilst
retaining similar terms of employment. There have been TUPE transfers of staff from services with a higher
proportion of people from BAME backgrounds but increases in BAME representation
in other services has helped maintain the overall BAME representation in the
Council’s workforce. Deborah Simpson asked the Panel members for feedback on what more the
council might do to help meet the action in the Black Lives Matter motion that
“requests that the City Council reviews the Single Equality Scheme, prior to a
reaffirmation of the scheme with particular and specific reference to the
employment, recruitment and retention of staff with particular emphasis on
enhancing consultation and representation of BAME staff”. One Panel member
commented that it was useful to hear that BAME people and disabled people made
up a higher proportion as apprentices than their proportion in the overall
workforce, and that it would be helpful to note their progression from the
apprenticeship in relation to their retention at the council. Deborah Simpson
said this was a useful observation and something the council can consider in
its reporting. |
|
Single Equality Scheme 2021 to 2024 consultation PDF 345 KB (Helen Crowther, Equality and Anti-Poverty Officer) Additional documents:
Minutes: A presentation was
delivered by Helen Crowther, Equality and Anti-Poverty Officer, on plans for
the development of and consultation for the new Single Equality Scheme (SES).
She shared: · The SES provides equality objectives
over a 3-year period and helps the council to meet the Public Sector Equality
Duty obligation that the council publish its equality objectives at least every
4 years. The next SES will be going to the Environment and Community Scrutiny
Committee on 1st July 2021 for approval. · Consultation is being undertaken with
Equalities Panel members (this meeting), race equality meetings with staff (one
was held in June 2020 and the next will be February 2021), staff members part
of the Joint Equalities Group, meetings with heads of service, and meetings
with voluntary and community sector (VCS) organisations supporting equality
groups. The VCS organisations have also been involved in helping the council
develop an Inclusion and Engagement Questionnaire – the findings of which will
inform the SES and potentially the VCS organisations’ own work. A meeting will
be held with the VCS organisations about the results. · Initial priorities for the next SES
are: o
Partnership
working o
Taking into account how intersectionality shapes need and also experiences of
discrimination. For instance, relating the SES to the council’s Anti-Poverty
Strategy, as some equality groups are more likely to experience poverty than
others and experience poverty in different ways o
Responding
to inequalities related to or exacerbated by Covid-19 o
Reflect
concerns around race equality · Some inequalities related to or
exacerbated by Covid-19 that shall be considered in the new SES include: o
Issues
in accessing healthcare not related to coronavirus and knock-on impacts of this o
How
South Asian groups are more vulnerable to coronavirus o
Worsened
mental health o
Digital
exclusion · Examples of issues relating to
equality that can be identified by cursory analysis of responses to the
Inclusion and Engagement questionnaire at 18th January (the
questionnaire was due to close on 1st February): o
In
many responses to the question on what the best thing about Cambridge is,
people mentioned ethnic diversity of the city. In responses about the worst
thing about Cambridge many people mentioned inequality and homelessness. o
When
asked how council services might be made more welcoming the most common answers
related to difficulties people have had in navigating our website and options
given when contacting the council by phone. o
Related
to health and wellbeing, issues emerging from responses were around missed
appointments or treatment for health conditions other than coronavirus during
the pandemic, and answers from respondents suggested that mental health and
isolation and loneliness has worsened during the pandemic. o
Relating
to safety, half of those who experienced domestic abuse did not report it to
the police. Also, a quarter of respondents had experienced bullying,
harassment, physical or verbal abuse, or threats related to age, disability,
gender, ethnicity, religion, sex, or sexual orientation. · The Panel was asked to note that the
questionnaire’s findings are not representative: they will give indications as
to some of the experiences and issues that some people from different equality
groups have in the city. Most people completing the questionnaire did so after
seeing it on social media and are from higher socio-economic backgrounds. Some
of the findings in the questionnaire may support national data on issues
experienced by different equality groups – demonstrating which national issues
are also experienced locally. A Mentimeter question was asked of Panel members “What do you
think the top priorities should be for the next Single Equality Scheme?” to
help generate the discussion consulting with Panel members on the next SES. The
most common five answers were: Inclusion, intersectionality, race equality,
mental health, and poverty. Panel members were
then invited to provide feedback on their views around what needs to be
prioritised in the new scheme: · Panel members were concerned that
school closures have exacerbated existing educational inequalities. The Panel
wanted to know where families without WiFi or
computers can go for support. · Given that the council is not a
mental health provider, the council was asked what impact it may have on
improving people’s mental health and wellbeing. A Panel member shared that
there may be many different things that make a difference to mental wellbeing
and working in partnership with other organisations will be key to this for the
council. · The council was asked what work is
being done to tackle loneliness most likely to be experienced by older people,
as this is a large reason for older people having visited food hubs during the
pandemic. · A Panel member supported
intersectionality as a priority and wondered if the new SES may further
strengthen the council’s work with mutual aid groups to pick up on numerous
issues people have. Another member shared that the council has been working
across services, groups and partnerships in a way it has never had to before to
respond to issues relating to the pandemic and felt it would be positive if
this were to continue. · A staff member of the Panel who has
worked in the community resilience team shared that they were worried that
whilst extra support is available to help people during the pandemic, this may
not continue beyond the pandemic when the need is still likely to be there –
especially relating to people in poverty. · Another Panel member expanded that
there are people who have needed support during the pandemic who have never
needed this before and who are likely to still need help after the pandemic is
over. · The Panel shared their concern for
people with no recourse to public funds in this category. It was noted there is
a lack of reliable data on the number of people with no recourse to public
funds because people in this situation do not tend to contact public services,
but there is a risk that the number of people in this category increases
following the UK’s departure from the EU if people do not have settled status. · A Panel member said that the SES
could consider children and young people who have been in care as a vulnerable
group. Council Officers
responded to these comments: · Suzanne Hemingway, Strategic
Director, shared that the Cambridgeshire Digital Partnership could help
families with no computers or WiFi. Moreover, if
people do not have access to a means to engage with online learning at home,
they can go into school. · Helen Crowther, Equality and
Anti-Poverty Officer, said that the council has been sharing information on how
people can look after their mental health through their website and information
on the #NowWereTalking campaign on social media. he #NowWereTalking campaign is part of Cambridgeshire County
Council’s Campaign to End Loneliness, which is aimed to help reduce loneliness
experienced by older people. Cambridge City Council has been supporting this
campaign since before the pandemic. · Many of the customers the council may
be supporting with queries have mental health issues, and training is run for
frontline staff to develop knowledge on mental health, communicating with
people with different mental health issues, and where people can seek support
for their mental health. The Council also supports people with mental health
issues as part of its Tenancy Sustainment Service. |
|
Any Other Business Minutes: Ariadne Henry, Community Development Officer and Panel
member, asked that information on Holocaust Memorial Day events be circulated
to Panel members. |
|
Date of Next Meeting The next Equalities Panel meeting will be held on 6 July
2021. Minutes: 6 July 2021. |