Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Agenda and minutes
Venue: Committee Room 1 & 2, The Guildhall, Market Square, Cambridge, CB2 3QJ. View directions
Contact: James Goddard Committee Manager
No. | Item |
---|---|
Apologies To receive any apologies for absence. Minutes: Apologies were
received from Councillors C. Smart and Gawthrope. Councillors Avery
and M. Smart were present as alternates. |
|
Declarations of Interest Members
are asked to declare at this stage any interests, which they may have in any of
the following items on the agenda. If any member is unsure whether or not they
should declare an interest on a particular matter, they are requested to seek
advice from the Head of Legal Services before the meeting. Minutes: No declarations of interest were made. |
|
To approve the minutes of the meeting on 25 March 2014 Minutes: The Committee queried if they were able to approve the minutes as a
correct record as membership had changed since the last meeting 25 March 2014.
The Committee Manager said that membership of the Committee should not affect
approval of the minutes. Members could take comfort that the draft minutes had
been viewed by Officers, Councillor Blencowe and former
Committee Members. Councillor Baigent asked for clarification on minute item 14/5/DPSSC vi (agenda P9 & 10). The Principal Planning Officer
responded that affordable housing could be replaced by student accommodation
for a limited number of sites under the 2006 Local Plan. This was not carried
over to the 2013 Local Plan. The Principal Planning Officer undertook to send
Councillor Baigent a statement to clarify the position outside of the meeting. The minutes of the 25 March 2014 meeting were approved and signed as a
correct record. |
|
Public Questions Minutes: No public questions were asked. |
|
Local Plan Review Verbal update from Planning Policy Manager Minutes: The Planning Policy Manager gave a presentation on the Cambridge Local Plan Review: i. Review started in 2011. ii. Key planning policy document for the city. iii. Sets policies and proposals for development up to 2031. iv. Involves a number of key stages requiring public consultation. v. Local Plan submitted to Secretary of State for examination (March 2014). vi. Submitted at the same time as the South Cambridgeshire Local Plan. vii. Laura Graham appointed as the Inspector and Alan Wood appointed as the Assistant Inspector. viii. The Inspectors have been made aware of representations and the evidence for consideration before the Pre-Hearing. ix. Main Steps: · Pre-Hearing Meeting scheduled for 11 September 2014 at 2pm. · Overall Programme of Matters and Issues to be released. · Joint Hearing Sessions with South Cambridgeshire District Council. · Consultation on Modifications. · Inspector’s Report. · Adoption. x. Modifications for consideration and issues from hearings will be reported back to DPSSC by Officers to seek a steer on significant issues during the examination process. In response to Councillor Baigent’s questions
the Head of Planning Services plus the Planning Policy Manager said the
following: i. Three public consultations had been undertaken already. Any further full public consultations will only be undertaken on modifications to the Local Plan, not on the Plan itself. ii. Comments made by Councillor Baigent in objection to the Local Plan before he became a Councillor would stand until withdrawn ie be considered by the Planning Inspector. Officers would liaise with Councillor Baigent after today’s meeting how to clarify to the Inspector that Councillor Baigent‘s comments were personal and not the view of the City Council. |
|
Memorandum of Understanding – Greater Cambridge Housing Trajectory PDF 30 KB Additional documents:
Minutes: Matter for
Decision The Officer’s
report set out the need for a Memorandum of Understanding between Cambridge
City Council and South Cambridgeshire District Council. The Memorandum of
Understanding states that, as part of the two Local Plan examinations, the
housing trajectories for the two areas should be considered together as a joint
trajectory for the purposes of housing supply, including a five year land
supply. Changes in
circumstances since the submission of the Local Plans indicate that a
Memorandum of Understanding between the Councils will demonstrate the soundness
of the plans. Decision
of Executive Councillor for Planning Policy and Transport Approved the Memorandum of
Understanding between Cambridge City Council and South Cambridgeshire District
Council set out in Appendix 1 of the Officer’s report. Reason for the Decision As set out in the Officer’s report. Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected Not applicable. Scrutiny
Considerations The Committee received a report from the Planning Policy Manager. She
referred to the meeting of Joint Strategic Transport and Spatial Planning Group
09:30 on 9 September 2014 where the Memorandum of Understanding was approved
without amendment. In response to Members’ questions the Planning Policy Manager said the
following: i. The Memorandum of Understanding would feed into the Local Plan examination process. South Cambridgeshire and the City Council housing trajectories were being considered together to show there was a five year housing supply. Any costs awarded against an individual council after a planning appeal would not be shared with the other council. ii. The purpose of the South Cambridgeshire and the City Council Local Plans was to set out planning policies and demonstrate sufficient land supply to meet demand. The Councils were confident that they had made their cases but the Planning Inspector may take a different view. iii. South Cambridgeshire Council had thought it had a five year housing supply, but discovered it did not when challenged through appeals. The Planning Policy Manager reiterated that South Cambridgeshire and the City Councils did have a five year housing supply when considered together. The Committee unanimously resolved to endorse the recommendation. The Executive Councillor approved the recommendation. The Executive Councillor
made the following remarks:
i.
There was a countywide Memorandum of Co-operation
in effect.
ii.
This had been established before Local Plans were
developed, but Local Plans built on the Memorandum of Co-operation.
iii.
Each local authority agreed to take an allocation
of housing and employment numbers.
iv.
The Memorandum of Understanding worked in parallel
with the Memorandum of Co-operation, both would be presented to the Planning
Inspector at the Local Plan examination.
v.
It was hoped the Planning Inspector would make an
interim judgement to give the Memorandum of Understanding some weight for
consideration in planning appeals once it was in the public domain. Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any
Dispensations Granted) No conflicts of interest
were declared by the Executive Councillor. |