Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Agenda and minutes
Venue: Council Chamber, The Guildhall, Market Square, Cambridge, CB2 3QJ [access the building via Peashill entrance]. View directions
Contact: Democratic Services Committee Manager
| No. | Item |
|---|---|
|
Apologies Minutes: Apologies were received from Councillors Dryden and Thornburrow.
|
|
|
Declarations of Interest Minutes: No declarations of interest were made. |
|
|
To follow Minutes: The minutes of the meeting held on 3 December
2025 were approved as a correct record and signed by the Chair. |
|
|
25/02643/FUL Castle End Mission, Pound Hill Minutes: The
Committee received an application for full planning permission. The
application sought approval for demolition of a metal-clad single-storey building
on Pound Hill, erection of a new extension of broadly similar appearance in its
place to create new community entrance and office/ meeting spaces, extension at
first floor over existing Gym Room at the southwest over the same footprint as
ground floor, extension at first floor only to partially cover existing car
park on northwest side of kitchen/WC block, install new accessible ramped and
stepped access from Pound Hill. The
Principal Planner updated her report by referring to the amendment sheet: -
Additional
third party comment. -
Amendment
to wording of reason for refusal 1 (changes underlined): The
proposed development, by reason of the demolition of the ‘Iron Hall’ would
result in the total loss and significant harm to the non-designated heritage
asset and would result in a moderate level of ‘less than substantial harm’ to
the retained elements of the Building of Local Interest and the Castle and
Victoria Conservation Area. In addition, the proposed first floor extension to
the gym building would result in a low level of ‘less than substantial harm’ to
the retained elements of the Building of Local Interest and the Castle and
Victoria Conservation Area. Subsequently, the cumulative impact of the proposal
on the conservation area and non-designated heritage assets would be a
moderate level of ‘less than substantial’ harm. The harm to the designated
and non-designated heritage assets has not been fully justified and the
identified benefits do not outweigh the identified harm. The application is
therefore contrary to Policies 61 and 62 of the Cambridge Local Plan (2018) and
paragraphs 212, 213, 215 and 216 of the NPPF (2024). A
local resident speaking on behalf of a Pound Hill resident addressed the
Committee speaking in objection to the application. Paul
Lee (Applicant) and Apostolos Petrakis (Archangel
Architects - Agent) addressed the Committee in support of the application. The Committee: Unanimously resolved to refuse the application for planning
permission in accordance with the Officer recommendation, for the reasons set
out in the Officer report and amendment sheet. |
|
|
25/04141/S73 639 Newmarket Road (McDonalds) Minutes: The Committee
received a Section 73 of the Town and Country Planning act 1990 (as amended)
application for permission to develop land without compliance with condition 6
of planning permission: C/00/0222/FP for demolition of existing public house
and erection of new class a3 restaurant and associated drive-through facility
together with alterations to existing parking area, including closure of
existing access and creation of new access onto Wadloes
Road McDonalds restaurant, 639 Newmarket road. The Senior Planner
updated her report by referring to the amendment sheet: -
An
amended Noise Impact Assessment was submitted, dated 23 December 2025. -
Amendments
to text. -
Additional
reason for refusal: The lack of
detailed plans and supporting evidence for the proposed acoustic barrier means
it has not been fully possible to ascertain whether the necessary noise
mitigation can be achieved without adverse harm to neighbouring residential
amenity, the character of the area, and existing trees. The proposal is
contrary to policies 1, 34, 35, 55, 56, 59 and 71 of the Cambridge Local Plan
(2018), Landscape in New Developments SPD (2010) and Trees and Development
Sites SPD (2009), NPPF (2024) and NPPG. Richard Cross (local franchise business
owner) addressed the Committee in support of the application. Elliot Tong (Ward Councillor) addressed the
Committee speaking in objection to the application. The Committee: Unanimously resolved to refuse the
Section 73 application in accordance with the Officer recommendation, for the
reasons set out in the Officer report and amendment sheet. |
|
|
25/02888/FUL Jewish Synagogue, 3 Thompsons Lane Additional documents: Minutes: The Committee
received an application for full planning permission. The application
sought approval for demolition of existing Synagogue and Jewish Community
facility and erection of a new Synagogue and Jewish Community facility
including parking spaces, new cycle storage, landscaping and associated
infrastructure works. The Senior
Planner updated his report by referring to the amendment sheet: -
Para
2.3, 10.92 and 10.93 amended to replace reference to CVSPA Building with
Discovery House Building (no.5 Thompsons Lane). -
Condition
6 amended to include reference to amended Noise Impact Assessment. -
Condition
20 amended to include reference to religious festival of sukkot. -
Condition
23 amended to include reference to approved document. -
No
amendments considered to alter officer recommendation or facilitate need for
further consultation with Third Party (technical changes). A Portugal Place
resident and Agent on Behalf of Thompson Lane residents addressed the Committee
speaking in objection to the application. Graham Morrison (Applicant’s Representative) addressed the Committee in support of
the application. The
Committee: Resolved by 5 votes to 0 with 1
abstention to
grant the application for planning permission in accordance with the Officer
recommendation, for the reasons set out in the Officer’s report, and subject to
the conditions recommended by the Officer (with delegated authority to Officers
to make minor amendments to the conditions as drafted) including the amendments
listed above. |
|
|
Minutes: The Committee noted the appeals list. |