Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Agenda and minutes
Venue: This a virtual meeting and therefore there is no physical location for this meeting.. View directions
Contact: Democratic Services Committee Manager
No. | Item | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apologies Minutes: No apologies were received. |
|||||||||||||
Declarations of Interest Minutes:
|
|||||||||||||
Minutes: The minutes of the meeting held on 4 March 2020 were approved as a
correct record and signed by the Chair. |
|||||||||||||
19/1098/FUL - 121-125 Chesterton Road (Mitchams Corner) PDF 441 KB Minutes: The Committee
received an application for full planning permission. The application
sought approval for the part demolition of the existing building and provision
of a mixed use scheme comprising 19 no. self-contained
shared residential units (4-8 bedrooms each) (within Class C4/Sui Generis). The
proposal also includes 2no. ‘flexible use’ retail units (Units 1 and 2) (Class
A1-A5 use) fronting Chesterton Road and 1no. ‘flexible use’ unit (Unit 3)
(Class D2 (yoga studio) or Class A1-A5 use) fronting Croft Holme Lane at ground
floor level. Provision of private and communal amenity space for shared
residential units, with associated landscaping, cycle and refuse/recycling
storage. The Senior Planner
updated his report by referring to details on the amendment sheet: i.
Revised recommendation: APPROVE
subject to: (i) the prior completion of an Agreement
under s106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 with the delegated
authority for officers to negotiate secure and complete such an Agreement and
(ii) conditions. ii.
Revised wording of conditions 10
and 16. iii.
Removal of paragraph 8.64 and
replacement with revised text. The Committee
received a representation in objection to the application from a resident of 2 Croftholme Lane: i.
With the appearance of a new apart
hotel in the Mitcham's Corner area, had experienced a noticeable increase in
antisocial behaviour at night, with much under-age drinking, sometimes on their
virtual doorstep. The new project seemed to be a further threat to the
relatively peaceful life of the neighbourhood. ii.
Their entire property would be
completely overlooked by the proposed multi-storey development, leading to loss
of privacy. iii.
Significant loss of light created
by the proposed multi-storey buildings would have an adverse effect on their
quality of life. iv.
Would welcome a
neighbourhood-friendly residential redevelopment, comprising family
accommodations, matching the height of the existing buildings in Croftholme Lane. Mr Tarzey (Applicant’s Agent) addressed the
Committee in support of the application. Councillor Baigent proposed an amendment to the Officer’s recommendation
to include an informative requesting short stay accommodation should not be
used for Airbnb. This amendment was carried
unanimously. Councillors Smart and Thornburrow proposed an amendment to the Officer’s
recommendation that the s106 agreement would
be brought to Chair, Vice Chair and Spokes for approval. If they did not
approve the s106 agreement, it would be brought back to committee for
consideration. Members would also receive a briefing on claw back clause
details. This amendment was carried
unanimously. Councillor Tunnicliffe proposed an amendment to the Officer’s
recommendation that the community should not
be gated. This amendment was carried
by 4 votes to 4 – and on the Chair’s casting vote. Councillor Thornburrow proposed an amendment to the Officer’s recommendation
that postboxes should be located
in the reception area. This amendment was carried
unanimously. The Committee: Resolved (4 votes
to 4 – and on the Chair’s casting vote) to grant the
application for planning permission in accordance with the Officer
recommendation, for the reasons set out in the Officer’s report, subject to:
i.
the prior completion of an Agreement under s106 of the Town and Country
Planning Act 1990 with the delegated authority for officers to negotiate and
secure an Agreement subject to the final details being agreed by Chair, Vice
Chair and Spokes in respect of (i)
a viability review mechanism establishing for the payment of a developer’s
financial contribution for an off-site commuted affordable housing contribution
in circumstances where the development generates a greater revenue than the
viability assessment provided by the applicant with the planning application;
(ii) a financial contribution covering the costs of tree planting, public realm
improvements and surfacing improvements of the public highway on Croft Holme
Lane and Victoria Road corner junction; and (iii) that all nineteen shared
living units shall remain as rented accommodation for a period of ten years
from the date of the first occupation of each unit; and
ii.
the planning conditions set out in
the Officer’s report; [and]
iii.
informatives
included on the planning permission in respect of: a.
The
applicant is advised to provide a facility for post-boxes to serve unit No’s
1-13 within the concierge space at the entrance to the shared living
accommodation. b. The applicant is advised to enable access to the
communal courtyard space during day time hours to promote inclusive
access to outdoor spaces. c. The applicant is reminded that the shared living
accommodation shall not be used for Air BnB short
term let accommodation. |
|||||||||||||
19/1734/FUL - Clerk Maxwell Road PDF 258 KB Minutes: The Committee received an application for
full planning permission. The application sought approval for erection
of 35 dwellings involving the re-positioning of existing access onto Clerk
Maxwell Road, provision of new spine road, parking, cycle provision,
landscaping and associated infrastructure. The Principal Planner updated his recommendation: Approve subject to: (1) the prior completion
of a s106 Agreement under the Town & Country Planning Act 1990 to secure
the planning obligations specified in para 8.86 of the Officer’s report and the
Amendment Sheet; and (2) the conditions contained within the Officer report The Committee received a representation in objection to the application from the Chairman of Clerk Maxwell Road Residents Association: i.
Specific concerns regarding: a.
Lack of green space. b.
Water run off management. c.
Impact on animals. d.
Impact on neighbours. e.
No overspill parking. f.
Not enough cycle parking. g.
Lack of cycle path lighting. ii.
A tree protection order and tree
maintenance was required. Mr Campbell (Applicant’s Agent) addressed the Committee in support of
the application. Councillor Thornburrow proposed an amendment to the Officer’s
recommendation that a condition should be added requiring tree
maintenance/replacement for 5 years. This amendment was carried unanimously. The Committee: Unanimously resolved to grant the application for planning
permission in accordance with the Officer recommendation, for the reasons set
out in the Officer’s report, subject to:
i.
the prior completion of a s106
Agreement under the Town & Country Planning Act 1990 to secure the planning
obligations specified in para 8.86 of this report and the Amendment Sheet;
ii.
the planning conditions set out in
the Officer’s report; and
iii.
the following additional condition
requiring tree
maintenance/replacement for 5 years. |
|||||||||||||
19/1444/FUL - 51-53 Argyle Street PDF 194 KB Minutes: Councillor Thornburrow did not participate
in the discussion or debate for this item as she was unable to be present for
the consideration of the whole item. The Committee received an application for
full planning permission. The application sought approval for the demolition of the existing garage and
ancillary structures (Class B1) and the erection of two new dwellinghouses
(Class C3). The Committee received a representation
in objection to the application from a local resident: i.
He had lived adjacent to the
property for 40 years and had a strong personal investment in the development
being done correctly. ii.
The proposal would restore the
pre-existing structure to the street. iii.
Expressed concerns regarding
height and shadowing. iv.
Commented that shadowing from the
proposal would mean that Stockwell Street would have no sunlight at all. v.
The panelling design of the front
windows was un-necessary. vi.
Proper sound insulation should be
installed. vii.
Expressed concern about dust
during construction. viii.
Expressed concern about loss of
income as they lived and worked in the house. ix.
Stated that parking should not
occur on double yellow lines. x.
Welcomed the proposal long-term. Ze'ev Feigis (Applicant’s Agent) addressed the
Committee in support of the application. The Committee: Resolved (by 7 votes to 0) to grant the
application for planning permission in accordance with the Officer
recommendation, for the reasons set out in the Officer’s report, subject to:
i.
the planning conditions set out in
the Officer’s report; and
ii.
the following additional
conditions with delegated authority to Officers to draft the
conditions: a. the
green and brown roof condition would be in perpetuity; b. a scheme for ecological enhancement. |
|||||||||||||
19/1770/FUL - 32 St Andrews Street PDF 151 KB Minutes: The Committee received an application for
full planning permission. The application sought approval for the change of use of the former Cambridge Building
Society branch (A2/B1) to an (A4) public house use with ancillary staff
accommodation and associated development including the insertion of new
openings and the relocation of the entrance. Ed Durrant (Applicant’s Agent) addressed the Committee in support of the
application. The Committee: Resolved (by 7 votes to 1) to grant the
application for planning permission in accordance with the Officer
recommendation, for the reasons set out in the Officer’s report, subject to:
i.
the planning conditions set out in
the Officer’s report;
ii.
the following amendment to
condition 12 with delegated authority to Officers to draft the
amended condition: a.
that only bedrooms 1 and 2 as
shown on the plans could be used as sleeping accommodation.
iii.
informative included on the
planning permission with delegated authority to Officers to draft the
information in respect of: a. the
protected stairwell. |
|||||||||||||
20/01318/FUL - 248 Coldhams Lane PDF 131 KB Minutes: Councillor McQueen left the meeting before
the consideration of item 20/8/Plan. The Committee received an application for
full planning permission. The application sought approval for the demolition of the existing single storey
bungalow and the erection of a terrace of 3no. 3 bedroom
houses along with new parking arrangements and associated works. The Committee: Resolved (by 7
votes to 0) to grant the application for planning permission
in accordance with the Officer recommendation, for the reasons set out in the
Officer’s report, and subject to the conditions recommended by the Officer. |