Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Agenda and minutes
Venue: Committee Room 1 & 2 - Guildhall
Contact: Toni Birkin Committee Manager
No. | Item |
---|---|
Declarations of Interest Minutes: There were no declarations of interest. |
|
Apologies for absence Minutes: Apologies for absence were received from Councillor Reiner, Councillor Stuart attended as an alternate member. |
|
Minutes of the previous meeting PDF 40 KB Minutes: The minutes of the previous meeting were approved as a true and accurate record of the meeting. |
|
Review of the Street Trading Policy PDF 42 KB Enclosed seperately Additional documents:
Minutes: The committee received a report from the Head of Tourism and
City Centre Management, regarding the review of the street trading policy. The committee made the following comments i. It was questioned whether there was
further opportunity to strengthen the requirements with regards to
sustainability issues. ii. Exploring the possibility of using the
seasonal pitches all year round, and the 3-day pitches all week was suggested. iii. Clarification was requested on whether
the manner in which the delegations were presented was standard practice. iv. Further clarity was requested on the
arrangements for considering a revocation, and whether it was appropriate for
the Head of Tourism and City Centre Management to review their own decision. v. A minor amendment was requested to 5.1.9
to improve the readability. vi. With reference to 5.2.2, the Head of
Tourism and City Centre Management was asked to clarify the deadline for
informing traders of changes, as both 2 and 8 weeks were listed in the report. vii. Further information was requested on
the charging arrangements for the stalls, and whether the current levels of
charges were appropriate. The Head of Tourism and City Centre Management responded and
made the following points ·
The suggestion regarding reviewing the seasonal pitches
was welcomed. It was suggested that it might be possible to create additional
capacity, but that this would be dependent on a range of factors. ·
It was confirmed that the proposed delegation
arrangements were consistent with normal practice. ·
The Head of Tourism and City Centre Management
explained the proposed process on the revocation process, and re-assured the
committee that there would be a separation of roles in the process. ·
The Head of Tourism and City Centre Management agreed
to clarify the wording of 5.1.9 and 5.2.2. ·
It was clarified that legislation regulated the level
of charges, but that the current arrangements were under review. It was noted
that the review of charges was an executive function, and the responsibility of
the relevant Executive Councillor rather than Licensing Committee. viii. Concerns were raised about whether the
proposals maintained an appropriate balance between competition and security. The Head of Tourism and City Centre Management acknowledged
the concerns, and explained that the proposals were consistent with good
practice across similar locations. The committee were assured that whilst the
proposals increased the security for stallholders, it also introduced greater
scrutiny for traders. ix. It was highlighted that the streetscape
had changed significantly and that there may be new locations, which could be
considered in future. x. The possibility of exploring the
potential use of ice cream stalls for other purposes in the winter was
welcomed. xi. Clarification was requested on the
extent of consultation, and whether members of the public had responded to the
consultation. The Chair highlighted that the list of responses included
individuals who were not directly associated with the street trading process or
other departments of the City Council. xii. Further information was requested on
the charges levied, and whether this included the costs associated with
cleaning. The Head of Tourism and City Centre Management confirmed
that the costs levied included the costs of street cleaning, but needed to be
reviewed. In response, it was suggested that the possibility of charging
different fees based on the nuisance caused by the trading activity could be
considered. The suggestion was noted. xiii. The proposed policies were noted, but it was
suggested that the procedure for informing applicants should be clarified to
make it clear that no expenditure or contractual commitments should be entered
into until written confirmation has been received. The importance of an
appropriate food handling qualification was also emphasised. xiv. Reservations were expressed in making
a decision prior to the circulation of the Internal Audit review into the
process. The Head of Tourism and City Centre Management assured the
committee that the proposed policy was consistent with the outcomes of the
Internal Audit report. Following discussion it was agreed that members of the
committee should have the opportunity to review the Internal Audit Report. Due
to the timescales for the 2013/14 application process, it was agreed to alter
recommendation 2.1 to approve the policy subject to the outcome of the internal
audit report. xv. Further information was requested on
how the demand for different types of stalls was assessed, and what mechanisms
were in place to assess new locations. The Head of Tourism and City Centre Management outlined the
process for assessing new locations. It was highlighted that each proposed
location would be subject to an individual assessment. The Chair expressed disappointment that the process for
identifying new locations for street trading had not progressed further. Resolved (Nem Com) i. To approve the final draft of the Street
Trading Policy and procedures as set out in Appendix A of the committee report
with a commencement date of 9th October 2012, subject to the policy approved
being consistent with the outcomes of the Internal Audit review. ii. To delegate to the Director of
Environment powers relating to the control and operation of street trading
except for decisions on the allocation of new or vacant pitches where more than
one applicant has applied for a pitch and decisions on renewal applications
where 5.2.6 of the street trading policy applies. iii. To authorise the Head of Tourism and City
Centre Management to further investigate designation of the following streets
as consent streets: Sussex St, Christ’s Lane, Parkers Piece (the area of public
highway marked with pitch number 21 in the agenda pack), Milton’s Walk, Pikes
Walk and to bring a report back to the licensing Committee. iv. To approve the extension of Pitch number
17 from 6 months to 8 months to bring it in line with all other 8 month
seasonal pitches. |
|
Emission Standards for Taxi Vehicles PDF 74 KB Additional documents:
Minutes: Mr David Wratten spoke on behalf of CCLT and explained that
34 vehicles would need to be removed from the fleet early as a result of the
policy adopted by the committee in June 2012. An extension to the deadline to
December 2014 for phasing out Euro 3 vehicles was requested. The committee were
advised of the financial implications for individuals if being required to
replace vehicles early. The Chair clarified with Mr Wratten the number of affected
vehicles. It was noted that due to the nature of adapted vehicles there was
often a lag time between a vehicle being constructed and registered. The committee received a report regarding emission standards
for taxi vehicles. The committee made the following comments on the report and
letter circulated by Mr Wratten. i. The Air Quality Action Area was adopted
in 2004, and the adopted policy was designed to support this. ii. It was noted that in the event of the
vehicles being removed from the fleet, they were still eligible to be licensed
as private hire vehicles in South Cambridgeshire and were likely to continue to
operate in the city. iii. Sympathy was expressed for the owners
of the affected vehicles. The relative impact of Euro 3, 4 and 5 was explained
to the committee. iv. The assertion that the 34 vehicles were a
small part of the trade was challenged. v. The importance of giving drivers proper
notice and not imposing changes, which have retrospective implications, was
highlighted. Following discussion it was agreed to
amend the recommendations to (changes marked as strikethroughs and red text) 2.1 Members are recommended to adopt a
policy to address air quality, as follows: i) a new vehicle licence will not be
granted in respect of a vehicle unless it is less than 4 years old and either
registered after 1st September 2009 or meets the Euro 5 standard or higher. The implementation date will be the ii) A vehicle licence will not be
renewed unless the vehicle is less than 9 years old and meets the Euro 4
standard or higher. The implementation date will be 1st 2.2 Members are recommended to adopt a
policy for renewals during a transitional period between the 8th October 2012
and 1st September 2013 as follows: No vehicle will be relicensed after In response to a question from the committee, Mr Wratten
explained that the trade would try and support the vehicles affected by the
revised policy, but it was unclear at this stage what this would involve. Resolved (Unanimously) to adopt a policy to address
air quality. i. A new vehicle licence will
not be granted in respect of a vehicle unless it is less than 4 years old and
either registered after 1st September 2009 or meets the Euro 5 standard or
higher. The implementation date will be the 1st December 2014 ii. A vehicle licence will not
be renewed unless the vehicle is less than 9 years old and meets the Euro 4
standard or higher. The implementation date will be 1st December 2014. iii. During a transitional period between
the 8th October 2012 and 1st October, no vehicle will be
re-licensed after the 8th anniversary of its first registration. |
|
Revision of Scheme of Delegation of function under the Gambling Act 2005 PDF 53 KB Minutes: The committee received a report regarding the revision of
the scheme of delegations of functions under the Gambling Act 2005. Resolved (Unanimously) to Delegate the licensing functions under the Gambling
Act 2005 to the Licensing Sub-Committee and the Head of Refuse and Environment
as set out in the table shown in paragraph 3.7 of the committee report. |
|
Review of Statement of Gambling Principles PDF 40 KB Additional documents: Minutes: The committee received a report from the Head of Refuse and
Environment regarding the “Review of the Statement of Gambling Principles”. Resolved (Unanimously) to i. Recommend that Council approves
the Statement of Gambling Principles shown in Appendix A and recommend to
Council that it is published on 21 December 2012, to come in to effect on 18
January 2013. |
|
Outcome of review of Statement of Licensing Policy PDF 60 KB Additional documents: Minutes: The committee received a report from the Head of Refuse and
Environment regarding the “Outcome of the review of the statement of licensing
policy”. The committee welcomed the report, but expressed frustration
that greater use of the review powers hadn’t been made and suggestions were
made to support the process. Resolved (Unanimously) to Recommend that Council approves the Statement of Licensing Policy as shown in Appendix B and recommend to Council that the policy is adopted from 25 October 2012. |