Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Agenda and minutes
Venue: Council Chamber, The Guildhall, Market Square, Cambridge, CB2 3QJ [access the building via Peashill entrance]. View directions
Contact: Democratic Services Committee Manager
No. | Item | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apologies Minutes: |
|||||||
Declarations of Interest Minutes:
|
|||||||
Additional documents: Minutes: The minutes of the meetings
held on 21 September 2022 and 03 November 2022 were approved as a correct
record and signed by the Chair. |
|||||||
Public Questions Minutes: There were no public
questions. |
|||||||
Officer Delegated Decisions |
|||||||
Additional documents: Minutes: The Committee noted the
contents of the report. |
|||||||
Additional documents: Minutes: The Committee noted the
contents of the report. |
|||||||
Additional documents: Minutes: The Committee noted the
contents of the report. |
|||||||
Minutes: The
Members made the following comments regarding this report: i. Asked for full report about the amount of work required of the Acting Mayor. ii. Would like something from the Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined Authority (CPCA) explaining why they are not paying this. iii. Felt there should have been a contingency plan for an Acting Mayor and how they would be paid if the Mayor was forced to take a leave of absence, as has happened in this case. In
response to statements from Members the Chief Executive Officer made the
following comments: i. Combined Authorities were relatively new institutions. When the statutory powers enabled by Parliament to create them were established there was no provision to provide a salary for the Deputy Mayor in the event of the Mayor taking a leave of absence. As far as the Chief Executive was aware, this is the first instance that this has happened in the country. ii. Would like to put on record that the Council did seek advice from the Independent Review Panel. They reflected there was no mechanism to cover the additional allowance for the Deputy Mayor. The Independent Review Panel stated that would have preferred to be more generous but felt constrained by the Councils own allowances. They have spoken to Government about this. iii. The CPCA can only pay a renumerated salary to the elected Mayor. There is no legal provision to pay a salary to Anna Smith as Acting Mayor. iv. The Independent Review Panel did agree a pay award due to the time commitments of the role. The amount is based on the allowances that the City Council currently provides as payment to Members who serve on the Combined Authority Board. This is a pro-rated amount. v. The Independent Renumeration Panel did not feel that they could go beyond our current set of allowances. vi. Agreed to follow up and bring back to the next Committee Meeting on 15 May 2023 if that was what Members would like. vii. They have contacted Government about this situation and the discussions would need to continue. The
Committee asked to a further report at the next meeting on this matter. |
|||||||
Draft Pay Policy Statement 2023/24 PDF 359 KB Minutes: The committee
received a report introduced by the Head of Human Resources. In response to
Members’ questions the Head of Human Resources said
the following: i.
Regarding the high cost of living in Cambridge,
if hiring from lower cost of living areas would need attractive salaries to
have people move to the area. ii.
Cannot rely on it being Cambridge, need to have
salary affordable to be able to move to and live in the area. iii.
It was not about individuals; it was about
salaries for the roles. iv.
Members asked the Head of Human Resources to
bring an update and further information to the January/February Civic Affairs
scrutiny meeting in 2024. In response to
Members’ questions the Chief Executive Officer said the following: i.
The salary amounts were linked to the Senior
Management Review. ii.
These salaries were baked into the forward
savings. iii.
Council needs to consider the bottom line. iv.
Council could consider a moving allowance. v.
Could get more data and evidence. vi.
Cost of living must be considered. vii.
All pay scales, not just Senior Management,
would need to be looked at. viii.
Would not prioritise Senior Management pay only. Resolved (by 5
votes to 0 – unanimous of those able to vote) to: i.
Consider and recommend to Council the draft Pay
Policy Statement 2023/2024 attached as Appendix 1. ii.
To consider and recommend to Council the pay
proposals for chief executive, director and assistant director level pay bands
following the 2022 review of senior officer salaries and as they relate to the
senior management review. iii.
To recommend to Council to delegate authority to
the Head of Human Resources to update the Pay Policy Statement 2023/24
following consideration and approval of the proposed changes to the pay bands
for the roles of Chief Executive, Director and Assistant Director. |
|||||||
External Auditor's Annual Report for the year ended 31 March 2022 PDF 225 KB Additional documents: Minutes: The
committee received a report introduced by Audit Partner from Ernst & Young
(EY). A
statement was read out by the Committee Manager from the Council’s Independent
Person Rob Bennett: I would
like to say well done to the finance team and the external auditors for working
together to deliver the audit completion ahead of 30 November 22. The
conclusions in the auditor's annual report are all positive and reflect very
well on the work of councillors and officers. Resolved
to note (by 5 votes to 0 – unanimous of those able to vote) to: i. The contents of the Auditor’s Annual Report for the year ended 31 March 2022 |
|||||||
2022/23 Statement of Accounts - Accounting Policies and Significant Areas of Judgement PDF 281 KB Minutes: The committee
received a report introduced by the Deputy Head of
Finance: In response to
Members’ questions the Deputy Head of Finance said the following: i. Buildings
where there was significant work required to bring them up to what would be
required by legislation, would have an impact regarding the valuation of those
assets as those costs have not been built into the valuation. A statement was read out by the Committee Manager from the Council’s
Independent Person Rob Bennett: This is a very
clear report. The area that I would keep under closest review is that the value
of investment properties given the uncertain economic climate that we are in. Resolved (by 5
votes to 0 – unanimous of those able to vote) to: i. To note that there are no significant changes to accounting policies anticipated for the 2022-23 Statement of Accounts. ii. To note and approve the proposed critical judgements and major sources of estimation uncertainty in respect of the 2022-23 Statement of Accounts. iii. To note the progress made in streamlining the 2021-22 accounts and to request further feedback from Civic Affairs Committee members on the current format of the Statement of Accounts, and suggestions for improvement. |
|||||||
Appointment of Deputy Electoral Registration Officer PDF 221 KB Minutes: The
committee received a report introduced by the Electoral Services Manager. In
response to Members’ questions the Electoral Services Manager said the
following: i. There was no renumeration for the appointment of a Deputy Registration Officer from the Government. The Chief Executive Officer added that there had been some New Burdens funding for these changes, however we will not know if this is enough until we have gone through a cycle.
ii.
Regarding 2.1 of the recommendation, the
sentence “one or more” means that the Electoral Registration officer can appoint
a deputy if the Electoral Services Manager became unavailable or if there were
other provisions that were to come in after the elections act meaning that one
would not be enough
iii.
The Chief Executive Officer acting as Returning
Officer stated that he already had the delegated authority to appoint Deputy
Returning Officers. However, the power to appoint a Deputy Registration Officer
lies with this
Committee. Resolved (by 5 votes to 0
– unanimous of those able to vote) to: i. Delegate to the ERO the power to appoint one or more deputies and to revoke or vary such appointments as necessary. ii. Note that if recommendation 2.1 is agreed, the ERO would be minded to appoint the Electoral Services Manager as Deputy ERO for Cambridge. |
|||||||
Leave Policy for Councillors PDF 443 KB Minutes: The committee
received a report introduced by the Democratic Services Manager. In response to
Members’ questions the Democratic Services Manager said
the following: i. “Caring needs” was not limited to only children but anyone who would be in need of care. ii. The pro-rata special responsibility allowance (SRA) was for a Councillor who steps into for example an Executive Councillors role during the time the Councillor on leave is away. The Councillor who has had to take leave will still receive their SRA while they are on leave. The SRA does not cover councillor work covered by the basic allowance eg. ward work. iii. There had been continuous discussions with Central Government about embracing advantages of online voting and ways of working that were in effect during COVID. iv. Group Leaders, and their delegated representatives have been involved in the drafting of this report. A written statement
from Councillor Porrer in support of the report was read out by the Committee
Manager. Resolved (by 5
votes to 0 – unanimous of those able to vote) to: i. Approve the Leave Policy for Councillors (appended). ii. Infant feeding by a Councillor be it breast-fed or bottle-fed is permitted at council meetings. |