Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue > Agenda and minutes
Venue: Committee Room 1 & 2 - Guildhall
Contact: Glenn Burgess Committee Manager
No. | Item |
---|---|
Apologies for absence Minutes: Apologies were received from Councillors Al Bander, Swanson and Reid. Councillor Saunders attended as an alternate for Councillor Al Bander. |
|
Declarations of interest Members are asked to declare at this
stage any interests that they may have in an item shown on this agenda. If any
member of the Committee is unsure whether or not they should declare an
interest on a particular matter, they should seek advice from the Head of Legal
Services before the meeting.
Minutes: None |
|
Public Questions Minutes: None |
|
Draft Revenue and Capital Budgets PDF 200 KB Amendments from groups on the Council may be submitted up to Friday 27 January and therefore may not be available for publication until next week. Additional documents:
Minutes: Executive Amendment –
Section 25 Report The Director of Resources introduced the Executive Amendment. Under the Local Government Act 2003, the Chief Financial Officer was required
to report to the authority, when it was making the statutory calculations
required to determine its Council Tax or precept, on the robustness of the
estimates made for the purposes of the calculations, and the adequacy of the
proposed financial reserves. The Scrutiny Committee considered and approved the
officer’s recommendation by 5 votes to 0. The Deputy Leader resolved
to:
i.
In respect of the recommendation of the Executive on 19 January 2012,
to include “Appendix X – Process for the 2012/13 Budget - Robustness of
Estimates and Adequacy of Reserves” within the body of Budget Setting Report
February 2012, for approval by Council on 23 February 2012. Labour Group Amendment The Leader of the Labour Group introduced the Labour
Amendment and thanked officers for their assistance. The following questions were put by Members on the
items in the Labour Amendment and answered (A) as listed:
i.
Clarity was
sought on the relationship between LB01 and LS01. A) Councillor Herbert
explained that there was a need to expand the enforcement team and that any
additional income generated from penalty tickets would be redirected to
additional cleaning services.
ii.
Clarity was
sought on the saving of £20,000 proposed under LS03. A) Councillor Herbert
explained that by returning smaller planning decisions to the Planning
Committee the amount of officer time required at evening Area Committees would
be reduced. Given their increased delivery responsibilities, this would also
ensure that the workload of Area Committees was manageable. iii.
Concern was
raised that when free bulky waste collections had been introduced previously
the service had been abused. A) Councillor Herbert explained that only those
meeting certain criteria would be eligible to receive free collections and
officers would actively monitor this. iv.
Clarity was sought
on the need for additional staff training as proposed under LB14. A) Councillor
Herbert explained that, due to the scale and complexity of benefit cuts, a
wider range of frontline staff would require training. The Director of Customer
and Community Services confirmed that, whilst an existing budget was in place
for staff training, the Labour Group’s proposals would increase this by
£10,000. v.
Further
information was requested on how the £10,000 proposed under LB14 would be
spent. A) Councillor Hebert confirmed that £3000 would be allocated for
leaflets, £2000 for staff training and £5000 for website updates. vi.
Further
information was requested on how the savings proposed under LS05 would be
achieved. A) Councillor Herbert explained that increased rental from commercial
properties would be aided by the appointment of a permanent Head of Property
and an additional Senior Surveyor. It was felt essential that the Council
maximise its assets and strive to meet income targets on commercial properties.
The Director of Resources confirmed that the additional post would improve
pro-active management of the current portfolio and work to reduce the level of
voids. vii.
Clarity was
sought on how the £37,800 saving proposed by LS02 would be achieved. A)
Councillor Herbert explained that the figure would be made up from the printing
and distribution costs of Cambridge Matters, and the reduction of half a staff
post. viii.
Clarity was
sought on the consequences of reducing Repair and Replacement (R&R) funding
as proposed by LS06. A) Councillor Herbert emphasised the need for a
significant review of R&R funding and greater scrutiny of capital
replacement and works. The Director of Resources confirmed that a review of
R&R, including the centralisation of some aspects of the fund, was
currently underway. It was also noted that all Project Appraisals would still
be open to challenge through the scrutiny process. The Director of Environment
highlighted the need to balance R&R savings with any increased risk to the
Council. ix.
Confirmation
was sought that the proposed savings figures were achievable and had been
accurately calculated against existing budgets. A) Councillor Herbert confirmed
that in preparing their alternative budget the Labour Group had worked closely
with the Director of Resources and all relevant officers. x.
In proposing
LB13 it was questioned whether the level of union support at other local
authorities had been investigated. A) Councillor Herbert confirmed that
discussions had been held with other local authorities. He also noted that,
with changes to the building cleaning contract and low staff morale indicated
through the Staff Survey, it was essential to maintain the current level of
union support. xi.
Clarity was
sought on whether the £20,000 funding proposed by LC03 was in addition to the
work already ongoing to improve seating in the City Centre. A) Councillor
Herbert confirmed that, whilst he had identified this problem over three years
ago, seating was still being removed from the City Centre. It was essential to
have additional seating in busy shopping areas to encourage older people to
continue using the City Centre. xii.
Further
information was requested on the £37,160 proposed by LHB01 for a Housing
Projects Officer. A) Councillor Herbert explained that, as a result of staffing
cuts when responsibility passed to the Customer Service Centre, additional
funding was needed to address environmental improvement projects and
understaffing in project delivery. xiii.
Clarity was
sought on the level of extra income proposed by LS01. A) Councillor Hebert
explained that an additional City Centre Enforcement Officer would result in
extra income being generated from penalty tickets for offences such as
littering and vandalism. xiv.
Clarity was
sought on the scheme for additional toilets proposed by LB15. A) Councillor
Herbert explained that the funding would provide ‘community toilets’, in
facilities such as pubs, in badly served areas of the city. xv.
Clarity was
sought on the suggested criteria for bids to the ‘Celebrate 2012 fund’ proposed
by LB10. A) Councillor Herbert explained that criteria would be developed that
would encourage and enable events to take place in the local community.
Councillor Benstead emphasised the relevance of the 2012 Olympics and the
Queens Jubilee and the importance of celebrating and embracing these occasions.
All members were thanked for participating in the
debate. |