Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Agenda and minutes
Venue: This a virtual meeting and therefore there is no physical location for this meeting.. View directions
Contact: Democratic Services Committee Manager
Note: If members of the public wish to address the committee please contact Democratic Services by 12 noon two working days before the meeting. Questions can be submitted throughout the meeting to Democratic.Services@cambridge.gov.uk and we will endeavour to respond to questions during the discussion on the relevant agenda item. If we run out of time a response will be provided to members of the public outside of the meeting and published on the relevant Area Committee meeting webpage.
No. | Item |
---|---|
Welcome, Introduction and Apologies for Absence Minutes: Apologies were received from Councillors Lee and Levien. |
|
Declarations of Interest Minutes: No interests were declared. |
|
Notes of Previous Meeting PDF 332 KB Minutes: The notes of the meeting held on 12 June 2023
were noted. |
|
Matters and Actions Arising from the Minutes PDF 151 KB Additional documents: Minutes: The committee action sheet was noted. Agenda item: Open
Forum // Minute reference: 23/12/SAC Councillor Davies to follow up issues raised
by Coordinator Neighbourhood Watch Scheme (Secretary RARA) regarding CCTV in
Red Cross Lane/Greenlands. Councillor Davies
referred to the answer given by Community Safety Manager in Open Forum (see
minute item 23/18/SAC). CCTV would be reviewed to see if it could be made
permanent. Agenda item: Open
Forum // Minute reference: 23/12/SAC Councillor Slatter to follow up issues
raised by public speaker about apartments on Whittle Avenue. Councillor Slatter
said scaffolding was still in place. She had contacted the people responsible
for commissioning work. Maintenance of solar panels had caused delays. If the
resident who had originally raised issues still had safety concerns, they could
contact Councillor Slatter. Agenda item:
Councillor Hauk to follow up issues raised by public speaker about anti-social
driving on Addenbrooke’s Drive. Specifically contacting David Plank Trumpington
Residents’ Association (TRA) to get further details about CCTV footage that
could be passed to the Police to take enforcement action. David Plank
addressed the committee: Cambridge
Biomedical Campus: No Through Road
i.
There were two related but distinct parts to the
question: (1) failure to stop misuse by drivers of the Cambridge Biomedical
Campus’s (CBC) no through roads, and (2) driver behaviour including speeding on
Addenbrooke’s Road.
ii.
It was in CBC’s interest to issue rat-running
notices to the Police to ensure campus roads were used mainly by CBC related
traffic and not general commuters. TRA had received no explanation from CBC
what had ‘gone wrong’ (tickets not being issued).
iii.
Planning conditions stipulated it was CBC’s
responsibility to take enforcement action in liaison with the Police. CBC could
not get a private company to do this on their behalf. Action Point:
Councillor Young (supported by Queen Edith’s Ward Councillors)
to follow up with Cambridge Biomedical Campus why no tickets issued for rat
running on Addenbrooke’s Road. ·
Report
progress back to next meeting. ·
Councillors
to advise Chair if they would like a Cambridge Biomedical Campus representative
to attend a future South Area Committee meeting. Addenbrooke’s
Road: Driver Behaviour & Speeding Councillor
Slatter said she had met with Highways Officers in 2022 to seek the
implementation of 20mph speed limit on roads in Trumpington. The speed limit
was expected to remain 30mph at present. Action: Councillor Beckett
to invite County Council Officer to attend a future South Area Committee
meeting to talk about speed limits across the city. The Community
Safety Manager suggested residents could volunteer for the Speed Watch training
program to undertake speed checks in their area. https://www.cambs.police.uk/advice/advice-and-information/wsi/watch-schemes-initiatives/community-speedwatch/community-speed-watch/ Mr Plank said it
was difficult to organise a Speed Watch campaign. Sergeant Sutcliffe
suggested drivers would drive as fast as possible on a road, regardless of the
speed limit on road signs, so lowering the speed
limit may not reduce speed. A more effective method was changing road layout
and street furniture to create features that physically made drivers slow down. Councillor Hauk asked if CCTV could be installed on Addenbrooke’s Road. It was unclear if this was a City Council or Police responsibility. |
|
Open Forum Minutes: The Coordinator Neighbourhood Watch Scheme raised the following issues:
i.
Asked
if the
Cambridge City Council temporary CCTV could be made be permanent as it had an
enormous positive impact on the whole neighbourhood
not just Greenlands Cambridge CB2 0QY.
ii.
65%
drop in footfall on Greenlands daytime, 95% drop 12
midnight to 5am - replicated on Red Cross Lane and Stansgate
Avenue - with similar stories reported from Musgrave Drive Ninewells.
iii.
This
has not just been external footfall and vehicles travelling through from the Park and Ride/Trumpington to and from the hospitals for
work, contractors, meetings/training or treatments and to Nightingale park.
iv.
Much
of the drop in numbers has been surprising as a lot has been from a reduction
in occupancy on Greenlands Estate and vehicles
visiting the estate to deliver food, take aways, goods, amazon/DPL and other
courier services, Private Hire Vehicles mostly Panther and some unknown,
individual motorbike/bike deliveries.
v.
The
Neighbourhood Watch Scheme has been invited to cover Nightingale Community
Garden as the people operating in Greenlands have
displaced to there since April and the ones operating in the park are the ones
who were doing drops, dealing, smoking and heating
drugs and meeting up with vehicles/motorbikes/bikes/young pedestrians on Greenlands prior to CCTV on both the Greenlands
Estate and highway. The Community
Safety Manager said:
i.
The effectiveness of all redeployable
CCTV cameras was reviewed after 3 months. The Greenlands
camera was due for review and due to the number of reports to both Police and
the Council’s ASB team, they were of the view that the CCTV should remain in
place for a further 3 months, after which there would be a further review.
ii.
In order to secure new permanent CCTV, additional
funding to purchase the camera and pole was required plus additional yearly
funds required to monitor and maintain the camera. At present there are no
available budgets to meet these costs.
iii.
To ensure the council is maximising the value/return
on investment of its existing public space CCTV camera network (200+ cameras),
officers were undertaking a review of all the public spare camera locations
against ASB/crime evidence to determine whether, or not, there are any
locations, where existing cameras are no longer needed; and which could be
re-located to other locations of need; and new locations where cameras are
needed. If unable to relocate cameras,
then results of review will be used to support a capital funding bid to cover
the supply and installation of additional public space cameras. Councillor Young raised the issue of anti-social behaviour in Nightingale Park. Councillor Davies commented that anti-social behaviour had transferred to Nightingale Gardens. Councillors suggested implementing better youth facilities to address the underlying causes of anti-social behaviour. Installation of CCTV on its own just moved the problem from one area to another. |
|
Policing and Safer Neighbourhoods SAC PDF 743 KB Additional documents: Minutes: The Committee
received a report from Sergeant Sutcliffe regarding policing and safer
neighbourhoods trends. The report
outlined actions taken since the last reporting period. The current emerging
issues/neighbourhood trends for each ward were also highlighted (see report for
full details). The virtual Area
Committee would not be making a decision, so would not vote on priorities set
by the Police. The Police reported back on the local areas of concern they were
currently focussing on. Councillors and members of the public could not change
these, but they could suggest ideas/issues for the Police to focus on. The Committee
discussed the following policing issues:
i.
Hate crime.
ii.
People may not report crimes to the Police due to a
lack of trust. How to overcome this?
iii.
If people did not want to report details directly
to the Police, or have their contact details passed on (Police could not take
action on hearsay), residents could be signposted to community groups. Details
were available on the City Council website.
iv.
The Police were addressing anti-social behaviour in
Cherry Hinton.
v.
Drug dealing, general crime and cycle crime in the
Hobson Square area. Residents would appreciate hearing about experience from
other areas on how to address issues.
vi.
Cycle crime was a city wide issue. The Police were
trying to address through measures such as bike marking so owners could be easily
identified. vii.
How to feedback ways on improving property design
to the Shared Planning Service to design out crime? Members of the public asked a number of
questions, as set out below. 1.
What
happens if an incident occured but there was no positive outcome eg an arrest? Sergeant
Sutcliffe: Options would be discussed with one/both parties. If action could
not be taken immediately, information would be gathered for future action. Community Safety
Manager: Referenced https://www.cambsvictimservices.co.uk/ Councillor Flaubert said people could also seek advice from the
Citizen’s Advice Bureau or EES website. They may also consider taking civil
action instead of a criminal prosecution where appropriate. 2.
Anti-Social Behaviour from a female from Fawcett Primary School towards a
child on the way to school. |