Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
25 Cambridge City Centre Cycle Parking Project PDF 63 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Public
Speaker Martin Lucas-Smith of Cambridge Cycle Campaign
Martin Lucas-Smith addressed the committee and made the following points:
The Executive Councillor for Planning and Climate Change thanked Mr Lucas-Smith for his suggestions. Conversion of car parking spaces was under consideration. However, this would result in a loss of income to the County Council. Detailed discussions on proposed location were for a later date. Cambridge Cycle Campaign would be invited to nominate a representative to the project board.
Matter
for Decision:
This report seeks to agree the project proposal, programme and scope for
the Cambridge City Centre Cycle Parking Project.
It further seeks approval to commence consultation on the on-street cycle parking proposals included within a Preliminary Design Report.
Decision of Executive Councillor for Planning
and Climate Change:
The Executive Councillor
resolved:
i.
To approve initiation of
the project, the scope and the programme in accordance with the project documentation
referenced in this report, with implementation subject to further scrutiny
through approval of project appraisals. Specific approval is sought for the
project, which includes the following:
• Project Proposal Report (Appendix A) of the Officer’s report.
• Project Programme (Appendix B) of the Officer’s report.
ii. To approve commencement of the design and consultation of the on-street parking proposals detailed in the Preliminary Design Report (Appendix C) of the Officer’s report.
Reason for the Decision:
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected:
Not applicable.
Scrutiny Considerations:
The Committee received a report from the Project Delivery
and Environment Manager regarding the Cambridge City Centre Cycle Parking
Project.
The committee made the following comments in
response to the report.
i.
It was acknowledged that there was
insufficient funding for a third underground cycle park.
ii.
The visual impact of high-density cycle
parking in the historic core would need careful consideration.
iii.
It was suggested that the Colleges could be
asked if they have land capacity for cycle parking areas.
iv.
The Equality Impact Assessment should be
amended to reflect the positive aspects of encouraging people cycle. It should
also highlight navigational aspect of cycle ranks so that they do not create
obstacles for other pavement users.
v.
It was agreed that the East Road area to be
added as an area in need of more cycle parking.
The Committee resolved unanimously to endorse the
recommendations.
The Executive Councillor approved the recommendation.
Conflicts of interest declared by the Executive Councillor (and any
dispensations granted)
Not applicable.