Issue - meetings

Matter for Decision

In 2010, the Housing Management Board approved the creation, with the help of the Chartered Institute of Housing, of a residents’ co-regulation panel in Cambridge. The Officer’s report introduced (as Appendix 1), a progress report on the positive outcomes achieved by residents’ Housing Regulation Panel in their second year of activity, and looks ahead to the next steps.

Decision of Executive Councillor for Housing

(i)           Noted the positive outcomes achieved by residents’ Housing Regulation Panel in their second year of activity.

(ii)          Approved continuing to support residents’ co-regulation and the constructive challenge provided by residents’ Housing Regulation Panel.

Reason for the Decision

As set out in the Officer’s report.

Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected

Not applicable.

Scrutiny Considerations

The Committee received a report from the Principal Tenant Participation Officer regarding the Progress Report From Residents' Housing Regulation Panel on Their Inspection of Services.

The Committee received a report from the Housing Regulation Panel Chair regarding activities during 2012/13.

The Committee made the following comments in response to the report:

(i)           Thanked the Housing Regulation Panel (HRP) and noted members good working relations with council officers.

(ii)          Bikes and buggies stored in public areas were major concerns as they caused obstructions.

(iii)        Suggested there was a lack of secure cycle parking for council properties.

In response to Members’ questions the Housing Regulation Panel Chair and Head of City Homes stated the following:

(i)           No smoking signs should be put up in public areas, it was the Council’s responsibility to do this. Permanent signs could prevent sticky ones being removed or vandalised.

(ii)          Rubbish dumping had been identified as an issue, particularly in Hazelwood Close. HRP were working with City Homes plus Streets and Open Spaces staff to address issues. The Council could charge people for the removal of rubbish they have dumped once they have proved to be the culprits.

(iii)        Secure cycle parking would be provided where required. Enforcement action would be taken against people leaving bikes/buggies etc in communal areas as these were hazards.

The Committee resolved unanimously to endorse the recommendation.

The Executive Councillor approved the recommendation.

Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any Dispensations Granted)

No conflicts of interest were declared by the Executive Councillor.