Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
34 South & East Transport Corridor Area Transport Plans PDF 45 KB
Minutes:
The Committee received a report from the Head of Transport & Infrastructure & Policy & Funding regarding South
& East Transport Corridor Area Transport Plans.
The Officer brought the report up to date by stating the County Council
Cabinet was prioritising and implementing transport schemes. A programme would
go to Cabinet in future. A methodology had now been agreed to assess any
schemes proposed by EAC.
The Head of Transport & Infrastructure & Policy
& Funding referred to progress on approved schemes as set out in her report.
The Committee made the following comments in response to the report:
(i)
Welcomed details on how projects were progressing.
(ii)
Expressed concern regarding the slow speed of project delivery.
(iii)
Referred to resident’s comments and said that County Officers needed
better communication with residents on priorities.
In response to Members’ questions the Head of Transport & Infrastructure & Policy & Funding said the
following:
(i)
£1.72 m
funding has been awarded as part of the Better Bus Area Funds towards enhancing
accessibility for buses on key corridors, an element of this is considering
better enforcement of infringements in bus lanes with partners.
(ii)
The Eastern Gate SPD was a City Council document. The County Council
were developing a Transport Strategy with the City and South Cambridgeshire
Councils, which may pick up key Eastern Gate SPD projects if they were not
eligible for corridor funding. A consultation exercise on the Transport
Strategy would be undertaken during Summer 2013.
(iii)
The City Council could spend Community Infrastructure Levy funding
anywhere within its boundaries. S106 funding would be restricted to site
specific use in future. The Transport Strategy could work alongside the new
Local Plan as a mechanism to overcome this.
(iv)
Risk assessments were undertaken for all projects to ensure they could
spend funding allocated.
(v)
Suggestions for projects could be sent to Daniel Clarke (Capital & Funding
Manger – County), Dearbhla Lawson (Head of
Transport & Infrastructure & Policy & Funding).
The Head of Transport & Infrastructure & Policy & Funding undertook to provide EAC
with further information regarding:
(i)
Details regarding the Tenison Road traffic
calming scheme, including funding available.
(ii) The possibility of installing temporary lights in Coleridge
Road for traffic management and speed monitoring purposes. Also to clarify
which organisation would have to pay the cost for these.
(iii)
If key
projects in the Eastern Gate SPD were eligible for corridor funding.
The Committee
noted the programme for progressing schemes in the area (set out in the
officer’s report); and proposed schemes for consideration and assessment of fit
with Area Corridor funding as follows:
(i)
Installing temporary lights in Coleridge
Road for traffic management and speed monitoring purposes.
(ii) Key projects in the
Eastern Gate SPD.
(iii)
Removal
of street signs in the Romsey Conservation Area.
(iv)
Perne
Road/Radegund Road roundabout.
(v) Completing work on the Cherry Hinton cycle
path (left unfinished by another project).
(vi)
Removal
of superfluous metal lumps/posts in pavements.
(vii)
Implementing
a standard requirement for county council contractors to remove street clutter
upon completion of work.
Councillor Blencowe said South Area Committee were funding a feasibility
study regarding a pedestrian/cycle link bridge to the Cambridge Leisure Park.
The Committee invited the Head of Transport & Infrastructure & Policy & Funding to return
at an appropriate point in future to report back on South & East
Transport Corridor Area Transport Plans.