Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
84 Review of Streetlife Anti-Social Behaviour PDF 104 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Matter
for Decision:
The report reviewed
the profile of street based anti-social behaviour in Cambridge City; the
current approach to support and enforcement; and suggested areas where policy
and practice should be reviewed.
The Leader and
Executive Councillor for Housing were jointly asked to note of the review of
street-based anti-social behaviour, the services and enforcement measures in
place to address problematic behaviour, and to agree to hold three multi-agency
workshops.
Decision of the Leader and the Executive Councillor for Housing:
The
Leader and the Executive Councillor for Housing jointly:
i.
Noted the
review of street-based anti-social behaviour and the services and enforcement measures
in place to address problematic behaviour;
ii.
Agreed to hold
three multi-agency workshops, open to all Cambridge City Councillors, on the
topic areas proposed in section 5 of the officer’s report.
Reason for the Decision:
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected:
Not applicable.
Scrutiny Considerations:
The Committee received a report from the Director of Customer and Community Services regarding the Review of Street-life Anti-social Behaviour.
Members questioned why the overall numbers of rough sleepers remained consistent while the profile had shifted towards higher numbers with a local connection. The Director of Customer and Community Services stated the reasons behind this were complex and would be further investigated.
Concerns were raised over the safety of rough
sleepers. Officers reported that violent incidents were few and appeared to be
opportunistic rather that targeted. The Police were praised for the way they
handled such incidents.
Daytime indoor provision and wet centres were
discussed. Concerns were raised about what such provision would achieve and
members were not supportive of an approach that would merely “tidy up” the
streets. Members agreed that any solutions must be outcome focused. Members
requested comparative national data to be included in future reports.
Improved use of licensing powers was
suggested as a way of resolving some of the problems associated with
street-life. Cumulative Impact Zone powers
had achieved some results. It was further suggested that members of the public
were not aware of the powers to request a review of a premises license.
Councillor Bick confirmed that the licensing dimension would be covered in the
workshops.
The Committee resolved unanimously to endorse the
recommendations.
Both the Leader and Executive Councillor Housing approved
the recommendations.
Conflicts of interest declared by the Executive Councillor (and any
dispensations granted)
Not applicable.