Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
47 Representations to the Transport Strategy for Cambridge and South Cambridgeshire (TSCSC) PDF 60 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Matter
for Decision:
i.
Cambridgeshire County Council is consulting on what a new Transport
Strategy for Cambridge and South Cambridgeshire (TSCSC) should look like. This
is the first step in the process and the document (Appendix B of the Officer’s
report) highlighted some of the main issues and challenges for transport in the
area, and asked what approach they should take in developing a new transport
strategy to address these issues.
ii.
The Executive
Councillor is recommended to agree the City Council’s proposed representations
to the County Council consultation on a Transport Strategy for Cambridge and
South Cambridgeshire, as set out in Appendix A.
Decision of Executive Councillor for Planning
and Sustainable Transport:
The Executive Councillor agreed the City Council’s proposed representations
to the County Council consultation on a Transport Strategy for Cambridge and
South Cambridgeshire, as set out in Appendix A of the Officer’s report and
subject to the amendments discussed below.
Reason for the Decision:
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected:
Not applicable.
Scrutiny Considerations:
The Committee received a report from the Planning Policy and Transport Officer regarding the representations relating to the Transport Strategy for Cambridge and South Cambridgeshire. The officer tabled an amendment sheet updated the report.
Members raised the following points:
i.
The validity of the statistics for travel
modes in other cities was questioned and members requested details on the
source of the data.
ii.
Members suggested that the strategy lacked
reference to the City of Cambridge ambitions for reduced carbon emissions and
suggested this be added to the representations.
iii.
The strategy was thought to be unambitious,
which might be acceptable for a holding document, but suggested that they would
support a more challenging final document.
iv.
A additional comment supporting additional
Park and Ride sites, possible located further afield, and/or expansion of
existing provision was suggested. However, this needed to me mindful of any
impact on rural bus provision.
v.
Members requested more clarity regarding
Community Bus Subsidies and how this would work in an urban environment.
vi.
A stronger introduction to the
representations was requested to reflect the need for a detailed transport
strategy sooner rather than later. This would also need to acknowledge
infrastructure funding issues.
The Committee resolved to endorse the recommendations. The
Chair and Spokes to agree the final draft to include the above suggestions.
The Executive Councillor approved the recommendation.
Conflicts of interest declared by the Executive Councillor (and any
dispensations granted)
Not applicable.