Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
51 Determine Options for Increasing Recycling in the City Beyond 45% Recycling Rate PDF 160 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Matter for Decision:
The Officer’s report sumarised the position relating
to Cambridge City Council’s past and present recycling performance compared to similar
authorities within the council’s Nearest Neighbour Group.
The Officer’s report set out recommended ways forward
for the short term, plus suggested initiatives that needed further information
and investigation for the longer term. The report also proposed that further
work was needed to establish why some residents were not recycling, which
recyclable materials were being put into black bins, and what new initiatives
would offer increased recycling rates in the most cost effective way to provide
carbon savings and improved customer satisfaction.
Recycling continued to be a Council priority for
environmental, legal and financial reasons.
Decision of Executive Councillor for Environmental and Waste
Services:
(i) Agreed:
·
That a Waste Compositional
Analysis be carried out with sampling taking place in spring/summer and
autumn/winter.
·
That participation
monitoring work be carried out.
·
That a residents survey be
carried out to establish who recycles, why residents recycle and what would
help residents to recycle more.
(ii) Agreed that officers
would prepare an action plan to increase the recycling rate to 50-55% by
2015/16, based on information gathered from section 2.1 of the Officer’s report
(with an average target increase of 2% per year).
(iii) Agreed the proposed
refinements to the existing service listed in section 3.29 of the Officer’s
report.
(iv) Agreed to rule out compulsory recycling at an
early stage due to its ineffectiveness.
(v) Agreed to reject use of funds recently announced
by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government for the purpose
of black bin collection in Cambridge, which was designed to bribe councils into
bringing back black bin collections, which could have a damaging impact on
recycling rates.
(vi) Agreed to bring forward budget proposals in the
next budget round to fund a targeted communication campaign designed to raise
recycling rates amongst demographic groups less likely to recycle, such as
short-term residents and those living in Houses in Multiple Occupation (HMOs).
Reason for the Decision:
As set out in the
Officer’s report.
Any
alternative options considered and rejected:
Not applicable.
Scrutiny Considerations:
The committee
received a report from the Head of Refuse &
Environment regarding options
for increasing recycling in the City beyond the 45% recycling rate.
The committee made
the following comments in response to the report.
(i) Proposed that
it was better to offer incentives rather than impose compulsory measures to
encourage recycling.
(ii) The law
allowed for compulsion to undertake recycling but the Executive Councillor
expressed a desire to avoid taking punitive measures.
In response to
Member’s questions the Head of Refuse &
Environment and Waste Strategy
Manager confirmed the following:
(i) Officers worked
in conjunction with residents to encourage recycling rates through education.
For example, using Cambridge Matters to provide information on refuse/recycling
services. Hard to reach groups were approached through measures such as a door
knocking campaign.
(ii) The Recycling
Plan was developed to enable individuals to increase their recycling rate.
Appendix A of the Officer’s report set out recycling services in addition to
blue bin collections. Figures on recycling rates were being obtained at the
time of the committee meeting. There would be no charge if residents requested
additional blue/green bins, but officers would seek to clarify where these
would be stored in order to avoid street clutter.
(iii) There were no financial implications in the current year as a
result of the Officer’s report. Any budget proposals for 2012/13 and beyond
would be considered during the forthcoming budget cycle. If Members agreed to
the report recommendations, Officers would work them up in more detail with the
Executive Councillor as any subsequent work would require a bid to be approved
by Members.
(iv) The Recycling
Champions scheme was successful with circa 75 volunteers in place to date
across the City to promote recycling. No other Cambridgeshire Authority had
such an uptake rate. City Rangers could provide advice and assistance in future
in addition to that offered by Recycling Champions.
Labour Councilors requested a change to the recommendations.
Councillor Owers formally proposed to add the following recommendations from
the Officer’s report:
·
(New 2.4) To agree to rule out compulsory recycling at an early
stage due to its ineffectiveness.
The committee approved this
additional recommendation by 8 votes to 1.
·
(New 2.5) To agree to reject use of funds recently announced by the
Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government for the purpose of
black bin collection in Cambridge, which was designed to bribe councils into bringing
back black bin collections, which could have a damaging impact on recycling
rates.
The
committee approved this additional recommendation unanimously.
·
(New 2.6) To agree to bring forward budget proposals in the next
budget round to fund a targeted communication campaign designed to raise
recycling rates amongst demographic groups less likely to recycle, such as
short-term residents and those living in HMOs.
The committee approved this additional recommendation
by 7 votes to 1.
The committee resolved unanimously to adopt
the recommendations as amended.
The
Executive Councillor approved the recommendations.
Conflicts of interest declared
by the Executive Councillor (and any dispensations granted)
Not applicable.