Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Election results > Document library > Issue
73 Review of Asset Management Plan PDF 272 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Matter for Decision
The Council has an existing General Fund Asset Management Plan approved in 2019. It was good practice to review such Plans every 5 years or so to reflect changes that have occurred since. There have been changes to property owned, how assets would be utilised post Covid and how they will be used in future as part of the Council’s wider ‘Our Cambridge’ business transformation programme so a review is timely. The Council’s Climate Change Strategy 2021-26 had set a net zero carbon target for its buildings included in its Greenhouse Gas report. The government’s Minimum Energy Efficiency Standards also requires that leased out/commercial property achieve an Energy Performance Certificate of at least ‘B’ by 2030. The Asset Management Plan sets out how the Council will manage its General Fund assets, is updated to reflect the current environmental performance of properties and how this will be improved to meet the targets as set out above.
Decision of the Executive Councillor for Finance,
Resources, Transformation and Non-Statutory Deputy Leader:
· Approve the Asset Management Plan as
attached at Appendix A; and
· Agree the proposed approach to
identifying works, seeking funding and delivery to meet environmental targets
by 2030 as set out in the Asset Management Plan and this report.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny Considerations
The Head of Property Services introduced the report.
Head of Property
Services, Assistant Chief Executive and Strategic Director said the following
in response to Members’ questions:
i.
Some
of the data in the report was historic data, advised that Assistant Chief
Executive could provide updated data.
ii.
The
Assistant Chief Executive stated Parkside Pool had historically been the
biggest emitter of carbon. Officers successfully applied to the Public Sector
Decarbonisation Fund a couple of years ago and that work was completed last
summer. Therefore, the data on emissions from Parkside Pool does not reflect
these completed works. Members should expect to see a significant reduction is
emissions from Parkside Pools when years data is published. This should be
available at the October 2023 Environment and Communities Scrutiny
Meeting.
iii.
Regarding
office accommodations, officers brought a report to S&R Committee in
October 2022 outlining the council’s approach. There was still demand in
Cambridge for office space. Recognised there was a surplus of office
accommodation at the Council. Currently most staff were based at Mandela House
since COVID 19, but it was still not being fully utilised. Refurbishment to the
Guildhall will take time. The council had let the ground floor to Allia who were now using and managing that space. This was
helping with overhead costs in respect to the building. Going forward the
council would need approximately 40% of the space that it had used historically.
The Guildhall would need to be refurbished and fit for purpose when staff moved
back. A project team would be working on how this could be accomplished.
iv.
Environmental
improvements would need to be undertaken with the refurbishment of the
Guildhall. The district heat network would be important to this process. It was
difficult to improve the performance of the Guildhall building. It was
difficult to install ground source heat pumps due to its location. There were
solar panels on the roof of the Guildhall but probably not enough room to
install air source heat pumps. Part of the process would be how to make
improvement to a listed building such as the Guildhall, to produce
environmental savings and also generate income from
spaces that the council did not utilise.
v.
When
reviews were done regarding Ditton Lane shops, officers would take into
consideration access and crime prevention if refurbishment was considered.
The Scrutiny Committee unanimously approved the recommendations.
The Executive Councillor for Finance, Resources and Transformation and Non-Statutory Deputy Leader approved the recommendations.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any
Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest
were declared by the Executive Councillor.