Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
5 Community Grants 2023-24 PDF 324 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Matter for
Decision
The Committee received the
annual report for the Community Grants fund for voluntary, community, and not
for profit organisations. It provided an overview of
the process, eligibility criteria, budget and applications received with
recommendations for 2023-24 awards.
Decision
of Executive Councillor for Equalities, Anti-Poverty and Wellbeing
Approved the Community
Grants to voluntary and community organisations for
2023-24, as set out in Appendix 1 and 2 of the Officer’s report, subject to the
budget approval in February 2023 and any further satisfactory information
required of applicant organisations.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee received a report from the Community Funding and Voluntary Sector Manager.
The Community Funding and Voluntary Sector Manager said the following in
response to Members’ questions:
i.
Evaluation of recent grant rounds had been omitted
due to Covid lockdown pressures. Details about the 2021-22 Annual Report were
included in the Officer’s report. Councillors were invited to give feedback on
information they would find helpful to include in future Annual Reports.
ii.
Applications were judged on their own merits.
Funding was not issued to applicants who did not meet criteria or provided
insufficient information.
iii.
Small grant funding was piloted as an initiative to
support small groups who were new to the funding bidding process.
iv.
The City Council were keen to explore how they
could support charities and small groups in the long term but were limited by
(available) City Council finances. Community Services were looking at options
such as multiple bidding windows for funding instead of an annual one.
v.
A number of stakeholder groups were involved in the
small grant application question design to ensure they were fit for purpose and
understandable for Applicants. The funding scheme was widely promoted to
encourage take up. Officers were investigating alternative/additional ways in
future. Officers used their knowledge to signpost Applicants to alternative
funding sources if they did not meet City Council criteria.
The Committee unanimously resolved to endorse the recommendation.
The Executive Councillor
approved the recommendation.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any
Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest
were declared by the Executive Councillor.