Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
6 Housing Ombudsman determinations PDF 300 KB
Minutes:
This item was
chaired by Diana Minns (Vice-Chair Tenant Leaseholder Representative).
Matter for
Decision
The report provides elected members with brief details
of the Housing Ombudsman’s finding of fault in two cases. The report details
why fault was found and outlines the actions the council has taken to remedy
the matter for the customer and identifies areas for improvement in the future.
Decision
of Executive Councillor for Housing
i.
Noted the information contained within the officer’s report.
ii.
Approved the remedial actions outlined and measures
established to reduce or eliminate the risk of repeat mistakes in future cases.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee received a report from the Head of Housing.
The Head of Housing said the following in response to the Committee’s
questions:
i.
Asked the Committee to note that it was standard
procedure on a stage 2 complaint response to refer people to the Housing
Ombudsman if they were not satisfied with the response provided by the Council.
It was noted that not all Council’s did this as standard practice.
ii.
Advised that the pilot hospital discharge scheme
was ended for a number of reasons. This included the fact that the funding from
Central Government had ceased, and that the Council already had other processes
in place.
iii.
It was accepted that the complaints had arisen from
officer errors. Training had been put in place to ensure that the issues did
not arise again.
The Committee resolved by 12 votes to 0
with 1 abstention to endorse the recommendations.
The Executive Councillor
approved the recommendations.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any
Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest
were declared by the Executive Councillor.