Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
7 Area Committee Grants 2023-24 PDF 294 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Councillors were reminded that the Committee
could not make decisions whilst the Area Committees were taking place virtually,
but any discussion / debate would be taken into consideration by Officers when
the delegated decisions were made.
In response to Members’ questions officers
said the following:
i.
Acknowledged
that Christ Pieces Resident Association had been successful in the past but had
not met the funding criteria on this occasion. The application had not
demonstrated how they would evidence an impact around social and or economic
deprivation or provided any evidence that the beneficiaries couldn’t fund the
activities themselves. Would be happy to
support the Resident Association to seek alternative funding.
ii.
Friends
of Midsummer Common would receive an increased award from the previous year
although not the full amount Requested as they also receive support from
another Council service
iii.
There
had been unprecedented demand for funding, but bids had been given rigorous
scrutiny from officers. Funding was
allocated where the criteria were met.
iv.
Reasons
why applications were not proposed to be awarded area committee grant funding
included:
a.
Significant
funding had already been provided by the council through the main community
grants fund.
b.
Poor or
insufficient detail regarding benefit to residents in the west area of
Cambridge; where appropriate officers would liaise with applicants where their
application would be better made to the main community grants fund.
c.
Inclusion
of inappropriate costs (e.g. equipment only requests).
d.
Financial
need of applicant group not demonstrated or over reliance on Community Grants
funding.
v.
Recommended
that organisations read through the guidance and talked with Grant Officers
before applying.
vi.
Money
that had been underspent within West Central Area would be placed into a
central ‘pot’ for funding.
vii.
Would
like to carry out a review of how effective area committee grants were with
only one funding window. A member briefing had been arranged in September to
discuss this matter with all Councillors.
viii.
Officers
would review the amount of detail included within the reports and would be
happy to discuss any further detailed queries outside of the meeting.