Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
44 Waterbeach Renewable Energy Network (WREN) Solar Project PDF 317 KB
Minutes:
Matter for
Decision
The
Greater Cambridge Shared Waste Service (GCSWS) for Cambridge City Council (CCC)
and South Cambridgeshire District Council (SCDC) has firm policy commitments to
decarbonise the fleet of refuse collection vehicles by 2030 and CCC has set a
target to reduce its direct carbon emissions from corporate buildings, fleet
vehicles and business travel to net zero carbon emissions by 2030.
A key
part of the decarbonisation programme was to replace the fleet of existing
diesel refuse collection vehicles (RCVs) as the current stock accounts for
1,800 tonnes of CO2 per year.
The
local electricity network at Waterbeach Depot had insufficient capacity to meet
the charging requirements of an electric fleet as the maximum grid capacity
would be reached now the two electric RCVs (eRCV) were operational.
In
order to continue the fleet decarbonisation programme to meet the Council’s
2030 net zero target, there was an urgent need for an on-site renewable energy
solution to enable charging of eRCVs. The Waterbeach Renewable Energy Network
(WREN) Solar Project was how this need would be met.
Decision
of Executive Councillor for Climate Change, Environment and City Centre
ii.
Supported the inclusion of a
capital proposal within the council’s General Fund Medium Term Financial
Strategy for a contribution of £1.3m towards the capital delivery cost, funded
by a £0.1m contribution from the council’s Climate Change Fund and £1.2m from
General Fund reserves.
iii.
Noted that the contribution of
£0.1m from the Council’s Climate Change Fund was match-funding to the
contribution being made from the existing GCSWS budget towards the project.
iv.
Delegated authority to the
Strategic Director in consultation with the Head of Legal Practice and Head of
Property Services to approve necessary contracts and leases to enable the
implementation of the WREN project.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee received a report from the Head of Property Services.
The Head of Property Services said the following in response to Members’
questions:
i.
Officers were working with a local contractor to
supply electric vehicles. They were confident there would be no supply issues.
ii.
Combustion engine vehicles were timetabled to be
replaced at the end of their working life.
iii.
Land required for vehicle replacement would be
rented from a site next to the shared wate depot. Planning permission was in
place for this.
iv.
Thirty five vehicles out of fifty from the waste
fleet could become eRCVs or ultra low emission
vehicles through this project. The intention was to use a mix of vehicles to
replace diesel ones in future such as hybrid and electric. Thirty to thirty
five vehicles would be replaced through this project, possibly more later.
The Committee unanimously resolved to endorse the recommendations.
The Executive Councillor
approved the recommendations.
She said the
Council had started a trial of hydrotreated vegetable oil fuels to lower vehicle
emissions.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any
Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest were declared by the Executive Councillor.