Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
7 Review of Public Spaces Protection Order for Dog Control PDF 233 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Matter for
Decision
The Public Spaces
Protection Order (Dog Control) 2017 (“Order”) is due to expire on the 19 October
2023, having been successfully reviewed and extended for three years in 2020.
At any point before expiry of the Order, the Council can vary or extend it by
up to three years if they consider it is necessary to prevent the original behaviour (for which it was introduced) from occurring or
recurring.
The Officer’s report
revisited the terms of the current Order (Appendix A), and asked the Executive
Councillor to approve, in principle, the proposal to extend and vary the Order
in respect of dog control (including dog fouling, dog exclusion, seasonal dog
on leads requirements, means to pick up faeces, dogs
on leads and restriction on number of dogs requirements) within Cambridge, in
the form set out at Appendix B and the locations set out in Appendix C; and to authorise officers to publicise
the proposed orders and to consult, as required by the Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014 (“The Act”).
Decision
of Executive Councillor for Open Spaces, Food Justice
and Community Development
i.
Approved the proposal to extend
and vary the Order for dog control within Cambridge in the form set out at
Appendix B and the locations set out in Appendix C; and
ii.
Authorised officers to publicise
the proposed Order, as set out in Appendix B and C of the Officer’s report, and
to carry out consultation as required by the Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and
Policing Act 2014.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee received a report from the Community Engagement and Enforcement Manager.
The Community Engagement and Enforcement Manager said the following in
response to Members’ questions:
i.
A Public Spaces
Protection Order would only be implemented after consultation to ascertain what
the public wanted. Details on the consultation process were set out on P66-67
of the Officer’s report.
ii.
A Public Spaces Protection
Order would be in place for up to 3 years. It could be reviewed or renewed any
time. Officers tended to review how a Public Spaces Protection Order was
working in order to recommend amendments for the next
one.
iii.
Public Spaces Protection
Orders were considered for all City Council owned open spaces. If one was
considered necessary Officers would observe an area, then write reports using
public comments as evidence to ensure recommendations reflected how people
wanted the area to be used.
iv.
People could report issues
to the Police or City Council via its webform. Noted Councillor suggestion to
list website details as posters in areas covered by Public Spaces Protection
Orders so people could see the areas affected.
v.
The Community Engagement and Enforcement Manager
did not recommend implementing a Public Spaces Protection
Order or ‘dogs on lead restriction’ for unfenced open areas as there was no
clear barrier to enforce/separate where a dog should not go.
vi.
There had been no
complaints about dogs in Lammas Land since 2017 so the Public Spaces Protection
Order had been removed from play areas in this location.
The Committee unanimously resolved to endorse the recommendations.
The Executive Councillor approved the recommendations.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any
Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest were declared by the Executive Councillor.