Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
Public Questions
Minutes:
The Committee Manager read out a statement on behalf of a member of the
public in relation to agenda item 22/8/HSC, the report on Hanover and Princess
Courts and Kingsway Flats.
i.
It had been stated that tenants would have the
option of moving out and then moving back in again. Asked if they would be able
to move back to the same flat that tenants were being forced to leave.
ii.
If tenants were able to return to the same flat
after redevelopment, what changes would have been made, for example the state
of decor etc.
iii.
If the redevelopment went ahead and tenants were
unable to be relocated locally, asked if they would be given the option of
locating country-wide and given priority on other council lists, or was it
Cambridge only. Asked if the council would pay removal costs to Cornwall for
example.
iv.
Compensation money and removal costs had been
promised, but no figures had been mentioned, or timescale for these payments to
be made. Asked if tenants would have to make the initial outlay and then claim
the money back. Stated that some tenants would not have enough money or savings
to be able to do that.
v.
Asked the committee to note that Residents’
meetings and coffee morning had been cancelled over the last few months due to
covid. This meant that residents of Hanover and Princess Courts had not been
able to come together to discuss their feelings, concerns
or opinions on the redevelopment.
Councillor Porrer (Ward Councillor for Market Ward) made the following
comments:
i.
Was supportive of agenda item 22/8/HSC Report on
Hanover and Princess Courts and Kingsway Flats but noted that residents wanted
clarity about what was going to happen and clear timescales.
ii.
Was supportive of the changes to the Lettings
Policy as this gave more options to tenants and leaseholders at an earlier
point in time.
iii.
Welcomed the Regeneration and Decant Support
Officer role.
iv. Noted paragraph
6.5 of the officer’s report and would welcome more detail about the
practicalities for example could tenants request to live in the same block as
other tenants to retain community links.
v.
Asked for site visits to the new developments at
Cromwell Road and Mill Road and to any other sites that tenants might be
interested in.
vi. Highlighted the
importance of open space provision as part of residential development.
vii. Noted that
resident involvement would be key in the process and that everyone should be
involved including those who were less confident with face-to-face
meetings.
Diana Minns (Vice Chair Tenant Representative) made the following
comments in response to the statement read out on behalf of the member of the
public:
i.
Noted that big meetings had not been held as they
only had a small community room and a lot of residents in Hanover and Princess
Court were vulnerable.
ii.
Residents’ coffee mornings had started again and
had taken place outside in the summer and inside up until just before
Christmas. None had taken place since due to the risks associated with the
omicron covid variant.
iii.
Reminded tenants that they could always speak with
any member of the Residents Association.
The Head of the Housing Development Agency made the following comments:
i.
The questions raised by the member of the public
would be addressed in a Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) document which
officers were putting together.
ii.
In response to Councillor Porrer:
a.
The Lettings Policy hadn’t been amended
specifically to relocate tenants from Hanover and Princess Court and Kingsway
Flats together but this was officer’s intention where
possible. Part of the next steps in the process would be to speak with
residents to find out what they would like in terms of whether they had anywhere
they would like to move to or move with a particular neighbour.
b.
It was also noted that although new schemes had
been identified there may be other sites that residents might be interested in.
c.
The points raised regarding the importance of open
space provision had also been noted.