Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
16 Future Leisure Management Arrangements PDF 305 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Matter for
Decision
The Officer’s report set
out a proposed approach for a strategic review of the council’s leisure provision
that will inform a future management options appraisal. The report also
recommended a rationale to extend the current leisure management contract by 30
months, until 31 March 2026 and covered the findings arising from 2021/22 trial
of winter opening hours at Jesus Green Lido.
GLL managed the lido.
Decision
of Executive Councillor for Communities
ii.
Approved the officer
recommendation to extend the current management contract for 30 months until
31st March 2026, under the same terms, but for a reduced management fee.
iii.
Noted the findings of GLL’s review
of the Jesus Green Lido winter opening pilot and agree to its
continuation under the same arrangements.
iv.
Noted the update and progress on
carbon reduction plans at the Council’s swimming pools.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee received a report from the Sport & Recreation Manager.
In response to the report Councillor Bick commented:
i.
The lido was a good form of social engagement. It
attracted people of various ages from casual users to the very fit.
ii.
People welcomed the lido being open during the
winter. Flood lights assisted this when there was less daylight in shorter
winter days so people could swim ‘at night’.
iii.
In future, could all open days be spaced out eg on alternate days?
The Sport & Recreation Manager said the following in response to
Members’ questions:
i.
GLL were using their own maintenance funds to
ensure the Jesus Green Lido stayed open to the end of the extended contract
period.
ii.
(Report paragraph 4.4) GLL made savings of £84k pa
through capital investment at the start of the project, so there were savings
to use now.
iii.
The contract was extended, not put out to public
tender, to give a longer time period to look at
options on how to manage leisure facilities. These would be brought back to
committee in future.
iv.
GLL had recruited lifeguards and swimming teachers.
Some of these needed to qualify. GLL offered a range of courses and classes to
facilitate this. Staffing levels were now close to pre-pandemic levels, so the
impact on leisure facilities was limited.
The Committee resolved by 9
votes to 0 to endorse the recommendations.
The Executive Councillor
approved the recommendations.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any
Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest
were declared by the Executive Councillor.