Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
7 HRA Budget-Setting Report (BSR) 2022/23 PDF 184 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Matter
for Decision
As part of the 2022/23 budget process, the range of
assumptions upon which the HRA Business Plan and Medium Term Financial Strategy
were based, have been reviewed in light of the latest information available,
culminating in the preparation of the HRA Budget Setting Report.
The HRA Budget-Setting Report provides an overview of
the review of the key assumptions. It sets out the key parameters for the
detailed recommendations and final budget proposals and is the basis for the
finalisation of the 2022/23 budgets.
Decision
of Executive Councillor for Housing
ii.
Approved that
affordable rents (inclusive of service charge) are reviewed in line with rent
legislation, to ensure that the rents charged are no more than 80% of market
rent, with rents for existing tenants increased by no more than inflation of
3.1%, measured by the Consumer Price Index (CPI) at September 2021, plus 1%,
resulting in rent increases of up to 4.1%. Local policy is to cap affordable
rents (inclusive of all service charges) at the Local Housing Allowance level,
which would usually result in rent variations in line with any changes notified
to the authority in this level if these result in a lower than 4.1% increase.
As the Local Housing Allowance was increased significantly in late March 2020,
affordable rent increases will be capped at 4.1% from April 2022, which is
still well below the 2022/23 Local Housing Allowances levels.
iii.
Approved that rents
for shared ownership properties are reviewed and amended from April 2022, in
line with the specific requirements within the lease for each property.
iv.
Approved that garage
and parking space charges for 2022/23 be increased by inflation at 2% in line
with the level of inflation incorporated into the HRA as part of the
Medium-Term Financial Strategy process, and that charges for parking permits
are reviewed, with any resulting charges summarised in Section 3 of the HRA
Budget Setting Report.
v.
Approved the proposed
service charges for Housing Revenue Account services and facilities, as shown
in Appendix B of the HRA Budget Setting Report.
vi.
Approved the proposed
leasehold administration charges for 2022/23, as detailed in Appendix B of the
HRA Budget Setting Report.
vii.
Approved that
caretaking, building cleaning, window cleaning, estate services, grounds
maintenance, temporary housing premises and utilities, sheltered scheme
premises and utilities, digital television aerial, gas maintenance, door entry
systems, lifts, electrical and mechanical maintenance, flat cleaning, third
party services, specialist equipment and catering charges continue to be
recovered at full cost, as detailed in Appendix B of the HRA Budget Setting
Report, recognising that local authorities should endeavour to limit increases
to inflation as measured by CPI at September 2021 (3.1%) plus 1%, wherever
possible.
viii.
Approved the updated
HRA Rent Setting Policy, included at Appendix M to the HRA Budget Setting
Report.
ix.
Approved with any amendments, the Revised Budget identified
in Section 4 and Appendix D (1) of the HRA Budget Setting Report, which
reflects a net reduction in the use of HRA reserves for 2021/22 of £262,870.
x.
Approved with any
amendments, any Non-Cash Limit items identified in Section 4 of the HRA Budget
Setting Report or shown in Appendix D (2) of the HRA Budget Setting Report.
xi.
Approved with any
amendments, any Savings, Increased Income, Unavoidable Revenue Bids, Reduced
Income Proposals and Bids, as shown in Appendix D (2) of the HRA Budget Setting
Report.
xii.
Approved the resulting
Housing Revenue Account revenue budget as summarised in the Housing Revenue
Account Summary Forecast 2021/22 to 2026/27 shown in Appendix J of the HRA
Budget Setting Report.
The Executive
Councillor recommended to Council to:
xiii.
Approve the revised
need to borrow over the 30-year life of the business plan, with the first
instance of this anticipated to be in 2022/23, to sustain the proposed level of
investment, which includes earmarking funding for delivery of a net 1,000 new
homes over a 10-year timeframe.
xiv.
Recognise that the
constitution delegates Treasury Management to the Head of Finance (Part 3, para
5.11), with Part 4F, C16 stating: ‘All executive decisions on borrowing,
investment or financing shall be delegated to the Head of Finance, who is
required to act in accordance with CIPFA’s Code of Practice for Treasury
Management in Local Authorities’.
xv.
Recognise that any
decision to borrow further will impact the authority’s ability to set-aside
resource to redeem 25% of the value of the housing debt by the point at which
the loan portfolio matures, with the approach to this to be reviewed before
further borrowing commences.
xvi.
Approve capital bids,
as detailed in Appendix D (3 ) and Appendix E of the HRA Budget Setting Report.
xvii.
Approve the latest
Decent Homes and Other HRA Stock Investment Programme to include reduced
expenditure for wall structure and fire safety works and re-phasing of other
elements of the programme into later years, as detailed in Appendix E of the
HRA Budget Setting Report.
xviii.
Approve the latest
budget sums, profiling and associated financing for all new build schemes,
including revised scheme budgets for Colville III, Fen Road, Ditton Fields,
Aragon Close, Sackville Close and Borrowdale based upon the latest cost
information from the Cambridge Investment Partnership (CIP) and a reduction in
unit numbers at Aylesborough Close, as detailed in Appendices E and H, and
summarised in Appendix K, of the HRA Budget Setting Report.
xix.
Approve the allocation
of funds from the budget earmarked for the delivery of 1,000 net new homes to
allow buy back of leasehold dwellings and relocation of tenants from Princess
and Hanover Court over the next two years, in advance of a final recommendation
for the future of the estate which will be presented once the options appraisal
and consultation work has been concluded.
xx.
Approve the revised
Housing Capital Investment Plan as shown in Appendix K of the HRA Budget-Setting
Report.
xxi.
Approve the inclusion
of Disabled Facilities Grant expenditure and associated grant income from
2022/23 onwards, based upon 2021/22 net grant received, with delegation to the
Head of Finance, as Section 151 Officer, to approve an in year increase or
decrease in the budget for disabled facilities grants in any year, in direct
relation to any increase or decrease in the capital grant funding for this
purpose, as received from the County Council through the Better Care Fund.
xxii.
Approve delegation to
the Head of Finance, as Section 151 Officer, to determine the most appropriate
use of any additional Disabled Facilities Grant funding, for the wider benefit
of the Shared Home Improvement Agency.
xxiii.
Approve delegation to the
Strategic Director to review and amend the level of fees charged by the Shared
Home Improvement Agency for disabled facilities grants and repair assistance
grants, in line with any decisions made by the Shared Home Improvement Agency
Board.
xxiv.
Approve delegation to
the Strategic Director to review, agree and enter into a revised Shared Home
Improvement Agency Shared Service Agreement, in line with recommendations made
by the Shared Home Improvement Agency Board.
xxv.
Approve delegation to
the Strategic Director, in consultation with the Head of Finance, as Section
151 Officer, to draw down resource from the ear-marked reserves for potential
debt redemption or re-investment, for the purpose of open market land or
property acquisition or new build housing development, should the need arise,
in order to meet deadlines for the use of retained right to buy receipts or to
facilitate future site redevelopment.
xxvi.
Approve delegation to
the Head of Finance, as Section 151 Officer, to make any necessary technical
amendments to detailed budgets in respect of recharges between the General Fund
and the HRA, with any change in impact for the HRA to be incorporated as part
of the HRA Medium Term Financial Strategy in September 2022.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee received a report from the Assistant Head of Finance and Business Manager.
The Committee made the following comments in response to the report:
i.
Noted the budget had been
drawn up in challenging times. The work of the HRA was dependent on rental
income, and that rents were proposed to be increased. Tenants had benefitted
from a reduction in rents however this had put improvement works, which were
dependent on rental income behind. The HRA could not support net zero carbon
initiatives across the whole of the housing stock. Central government needed to
provide resources to do this. 96% of the housing stock were at decent homes
standard and the council was working towards 100% of the stock being decent
homes standard.
ii.
Asked if rents had to
increase to off-set shortfalls in rental income from the Mill Road and Cromwell
Road developments.
iii.
Noted inflation
assumptions had been built into the HRA as best as officers could from the
autumn’s numbers however there had been a marked increase. Asked what assurance
could be given to manage inflation increases.
iv. Felt the Council was in a holding pattern as new housing developments
were dependent upon receipt of Homes England funding.
v.
The isolation of elderly
residents was a problem and the council could not wait for the internal scoping
work study (as set out in the Labour amendment to the fourth bullet point in
recommendation 1.3 on page 2-3 of the Liberal Democrat Amendment document) to
be undertaken.
vi. Noted reference to a decarbonisation fund but this was not set out in
any document.
vii. Asked how much CO2 the council’s housing stock was putting into the
atmosphere.
The Assistant Head of Finance and Business Manager said the following in
response to Members’ questions:
i.
Rent increases were not linked in any way to delays
in rental income from the Mill Road and Cromwell Road development. However if
rents were not increased, then savings would have to be made elsewhere and
difficult decisions would need to be taken about where to reduce expenditure.
Rent levels had always been set in accordance with government guidelines. Rent
increases meant the council could continue to deliver a programme of investment
and would for example cover the retrofit pilot project.
ii.
Recognised that inflation was proving a challenge.
Had built an additional 1.7% inflation in as part of the budget process, over
and above the estimate of 2% rise in inflation in the Housing Revenue Account
Medium Term Financial Strategy. These funds would be held centrally and
allocated to areas as required to fulfil contractual commitments. This would be
reviewed again as part of the Medium-Term Financial Strategy.
Councillor Dalzell introduced the Liberal Democrat Amendment to the
2022/23 Housing Revenue Budget.
Councillor Robertson proposed an amendment to the fourth bullet point in recommendation 1.3 on
page 2-3 of the Liberal Democrat Amendment document. (deleted text struckthrough,
additional text underlined.)
The amendment was approved by 9 votes in favour, 1 against and 4
abstentions.
The Chair decided that the recommendations highlighted in the Liberal
Democrat Group (LD) amendment (as amended) should be voted on and recorded
separately:
The following vote was chaired by Councillor Sheil.
LD1.3(i). A
proposal to specifically earmark any net underspend in revenue repair budgets,
capital decent homes budgets and capital other spend on own stock budgets from
the financial year 2021/22 onwards, after allowing for any requested carry
forwards, with the resource set-aside for investment in improving the energy
efficiency of our existing housing stock. Any resulting resource will be
incorporated into delivery plans as soon as is practical after being
ear-marked, to ensure that any available funding is directed into helping to
meet net zero carbon targets across the housing portfolio. Over the last 5
years, this would have given rise to an ear-marked fund of in excess of £3.5
million.
The amendment was lost by 3 votes in favour to 6 against.
The following vote was chaired by Councillor Sheil.
LD1.3(ii). A
proposal that if a Social Housing De-Carbonisation Fund (SHDF) Wave 1 grant bid
for approximately £783,000 is successful, that delegated authority be given to
the Head of Finance to both recognise the grant income in 2022/23 and to
increase the energy investment budget by the same sum to allow additional
properties to receive the much-needed investment in 2022/23, or at the earliest
delivery opportunity.
The amendment was lost by 3 votes in favour to 6 against.
The following vote was chaired by Diana Minns.
LD1.3(iii). A
proposal to include a revenue bid of £12,000 in 2022/23 to employ resource to
undertake a project to allow the estimated carbon footprint of the housing
stock to be measured and to put in place a robust structure to facilitate
reporting the carbon impact of any future investment proposals. This will
provide an estimated baseline and will enable improved evaluation of future
investment proposals.
The amendment was lost by 3 votes in favour to 8 against with 1
abstention..
The following vote was chaired
by Diana Minns.
LG1.3(iv). A proposal for internal scoping work, including the Independent Living Service and Communities Service, alongside the assessment of external provision, to inform an analysis of the services provided to older residents (not just council tenants) experiencing isolation and to assess community needs. This analysis may include recommending a future revenue bid for a Community Inclusion Officer. They would work across the sheltered housing portfolio and with older tenants in our general needs housing, to support residents, to improve connectivity between sheltered schemes and other residents and to reduce loneliness and social isolation. The new post would supplement the existing Independent Living Service.
The amendment was carried by 9 votes in favour to 1 against with 4 abstentions.
Councillor Bennett introduced the Green and Independent Group Amendment
to the 2022/23 Housing Revenue Budget.
Councillor Robertson proposed an amendment to the Green and Independent
Group Amendment proposed third
bullet point in recommendation 1.3 on page 3 of the Green and Independent
Amendment document. (deleted text struckthrough, additional text underlined.)
A
proposal to request officers to include in the Transformation Programme
some workshops of councillors and stakeholders, such as tenant and leaseholder
representatives, set up a small volunteer cross party working
group to work on a short, focussed overview of the HRA Medium
Term Financial Strategy and Budget Setting Reports and the General Fund
Medium Term Financial Strategy and Budget Setting Reports, which
could summarise and communicate information more effectively such as by:
Popular
ways to do this include:
·
Use
of key questions
·
Graphical
presentation
·
Key performance indicators
·
Benchmarking
This
would facilitate more effective scrutiny by all councillors and clearer
communication to city residents.
A cost
figure is not provided for this recommendation because the HRA’s accounting
function already produces a very full range of high quality key performance
indicator reports and benchmarking. The proposed new overview
report would be is an introductory guided tour that
assists users to engage with the main report and put it in context.
Councillor Bennett accepted Councillor
Robertson’s amendment to the Green and Independent Group recommendation
1.3(iii) and agreed to withdraw the Green and Independent Group recommendation
1.3(iv) following a commitment from the Executive Councillor to provide the
information requested in recommendation 1.3(iv) as far as it was possible
within existing resources.
The Chair decided
that the recommendations highlighted in the Green and Independent Group (GI)
amendment (as amended) should be voted on and recorded separately:
The following vote
was chaired by Diana Minns.
GI1.3(i). A
proposal to include a revenue bid of £40,000 to fund a project to explore
alternative housing delivery options, with a focus on the delivery of smaller
homes, such as:
POD homes for retention in the HRA and the
potential for conversion of existing unused office and retail space into
residential accommodation: and
Delivery models that include smaller
self-contained accommodation on co-living principles to provide safe,
affordable, sociable and sustainable living space.
This could include shared communal
facilities such as laundry rooms, guest rooms, co working space and social
meeting space which could also be available to the wider community.
The project has been conceived with the particular
needs of young key workers and care leavers in mind but could be adapted to
suit more diverse groups of residents.
The project will cover market research,
feasibility work, site identification, a review of vacant office and retail
space in the city and liaison with planning.
The amendment was lost by 2 votes in favour to 10 against and 2
abstentions.
Recommendation GI1.3(ii) was contingent on recommendation GI1.3(i) as
this amendment was lost recommendation GI1.3(ii) fell.
The following vote was chaired by Diana Minns.
GI1.3(iii). A proposal to request officers to include in the
Transformation Programme some workshops of councillors and stakeholders, such
as tenant and leaseholder representatives, to work on a short, focussed
overview of the HRA Medium Term Financial Strategy and Budget Setting Reports
and the General Fund Medium Term Financial Strategy and Budget Setting Reports,
which could summarise and communicate information more effectively such as by:
• Use of key questions
• Graphical presentation
• Key performance indicators
• Benchmarking
This would facilitate more effective scrutiny by all councillors and
clearer communication to city residents.
A cost figure is not provided for this recommendation because the HRA’s
accounting function already produces a very full range of high quality key
performance indicator reports and benchmarking. The proposed new overview
report would be an introductory guided tour that assists users to engage with
the main report and put it in context.
The amendment was carried by 13 votes in favour to 0 against and 1
abstentions.
The following vote was chaired by Diana Minns.
The Committee resolved by 12 votes to 0 to endorse the
recommendations a - l of the budget
proposal including the Liberal Democrat Group recommendation (as amended)
1.4(iv) and the Green and Independent Group recommendation (as amended)
1.3(iii).
The following vote was chaired by Councillor Sheil.
The Committee resolved by 7 votes to 0 to endorse the
recommendations m – z of the budget
proposal.
The Executive Councillor
approved the recommendations.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any
Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest
were declared by the Executive Councillor.