Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
19 ROD Parking Permits March 2021 PDF 197 KB
As Chair I have ruled that under 100B(4)(b) of the Local Government Act
1972 the Record of Decision concerning parking permits (a late item) could be
brought to this committee despite not being made publicly available for this
Committee five clear days prior to the meeting.
The reason being that the decision has been made and is one to be noted. This enables the item to be brought to this committee for comment in a public forum rather than wait until the June Committee.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The Strategic
Director said the following in response to comments made by Councillor Bick.
i.
There
were several factors that had been considered when making this decision which
included government legislation and their roadmap to ease restrictions during
the pandemic and health and safety regulations.
ii.
The
roadmap offered an opportunity for all business to re-open over the next three
months.
iii.
The
work of external partnerships also had to be considered. The County Council
were currently studying the lifting of restricted bus services from the park
and ride sites across the city and opening public transport.
iv.
The
requirements of the community and voluntary sector workers (low paid and those
who gave their time for free) who supported community aid and those who
supported essential business which were open had also been considered.
v.
The
Council supported the reduction in the excess use of private vehicles.
vi.
Income
from the car park was essential in allowing the Council to supply other
services to the community.
vii.
Free
parking had been allocated to public and voluntary sector workers in a previous
Record of Decision also to those workers for essential businesses open during
the lock down period.
viii.
Important
to take into consideration the council resources to manage free or discounted
permits; also, the physical changes to tariffs on car parks which took time to
change.
ix.
The
Council had taken the view that over the next three months that most business
would be able to operate.
x.
There
were numerous public and voluntary sector workers who travelled across the city
providing support and aid and therefore it was relevant to extend the free
parking to these groups.
xi.
Discounted
permits were also available for the next three months for low paid workers who
had supported essential business.
The Executive Councillor for Transport and
Community Safety stated it was important that public transport was not a
casualty of the pandemic.
Many council officers were working from home while
some had been redeployed elsewhere to assist with essential services. Believed
the amount of city council officers using the car parks would be minimal and
the benefit to the wider public sector would be greater.
Councillor Bick requested his dissatisfaction to
the responses given be minuted.
It was not a question at how essential the services
were that people were providing but they had employment contracts in which they
had no choice in delivering them. This applied to both those in the public and
private sector, public money was being used to provide free or discounted
parking which those in the private had contributed to who were being denied
this substantial benefit.
The decision was unfair and unreasonable, people
should be treated the same.
The decision was then noted.