Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
Additional documents:
Minutes:
This item was
chaired by Councillor Mike Todd-Jones
Matter for
Decision
An independent feasibility
study was conducted into the need for selective licensing of private rented
properties within Cambridge City. The study was for the purpose of identifying
if it was appropriate for the Council to implement a scheme.
Decision
of Executive Councillor for Housing
i.
Agreed that the Feasibility Study
Report, contained in Appendix A of the Officer’s report could be released into
the public domain.
ii.
Agreed the actions outlined within
the Committee Report to address recommendations of the Feasibility Study Report
throughout 2021/22, continuing the Council’s focus of improving and sustaining
the quality of the private rented sector within the City.
iii.
Agreed that an annual report be brought back
assessing progress on the work in time for any new bids to be submitted for
work in the budget for the following year.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee
received a report from the Residential Team Manager,
Environmental Services.
The Executive Councillor said the following in response to Members’
questions:
i.
The report raised several possibilities where the
council could take action against private sector landlords where they did not
respond to issues raised by tenants.
ii.
The report had a wider scope than just housing
(acknowledged there was a high demand for this). The report looked at
socio-economic issues (eg crime) and how actions could be taken to address
these.
The Residential
Team Manager said that work was underway to set up an enforcement group to share
intelligence across regulatory services within the council as well as with
external stakeholders including the Fire Service.
Councillor Robertson requested a change to
the recommendation in the Officer’s report:
Add third recommendation: 2.3 Agree that an annual report be brought
back assessing progress on the work in time for any new bids be submitted for
work in the budget for the following year.”
The
Committee unanimously approved this additional
recommendation.
The Chair decided that the recommendations highlighted in the Officer’s
report should be voted on and recorded separately:
The Committee unanimously endorsed
recommendation 2.1.
The Committee endorsed recommendation 2.2 by 5 votes to 0 with 3
abstentions.
The Committee approved (new) recommendation 2.3
unanimously.
The Executive Councillor approved the recommendations as
amended.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any
Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest
were declared by the Executive Councillor.