Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
13 Update on the Work Towards a new Council Housing Programme PDF 1 MB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
This item was
chaired by Councillor Mike Todd-Jones
Matter for
Decision
The Officer’s report
provided an update on the new build housing programme for 2022-2032.
Decision
of Executive Councillor for Housing
i.
Approved the recommendations from
the Buro Happold Report,
and agreed these should be included in the Updated Sustainable Housing Design
Guide so that all council developments will be required to:
a. Target
Net Zero Carbon from 2030.
b. Target
Passivhaus certification from 2021.
c. Attain
Sustainability targets for water, overheating, post-occupancy evaluation (POE),
Electric vehicle charging, car parking and biodiversity.
To
attain this will require the adoption of:
d. the
Sustainability Roadmap to Net Zero Carbon.
e. the
decision-making process for sustainability standards.
f. the
seven principles of sustainability.
ii.
Approved the following delivery
strategy:
a. Pursue
a mix of delivery strategies to deliver the 10-year programme.
b. The majority of the programme to be delivered through
CIP.
c. A
programme of smaller schemes to be delivered through design and build
contracts.
d. Purchase
of affordable units from developers delivered as a result of S106 agreements.
e. Consideration
of other opportunities which may arise for joint ventures or development
agreements with other partners.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee received a report from the Head of Housing Development
Agency.
The Strategic Director and Head of Housing Development Agency said the
following in response to Members’ questions:
i.
Circa two thousand homes were being built to the Passivhaus standard.
ii.
National bodies and other local authorities were
supportive of the standard but were not building on similar scale schemes to
Cambridge as the risks were higher to achieve targets.
The Committee resolved by 5 votes to 0 (with 3 abstentions) to endorse
the recommendations.
The Executive Councillor
approved the recommendations.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any
Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest
were declared by the Executive Councillor.