Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
19 Cumulative Impact Assessment PDF 394 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The Committee received a report from the Senior Technical Officer.
The Officer’s report advised Section 5 of the Licensing Act 2003
requires a licensing authority to prepare and publish a statement of its
licensing policy at least every five years. During the five-year period, the
policy must be kept under review and the licensing authority may make any
revisions to it as it considers appropriate. The existing Statement of
Licensing Policy for Cambridge City Council became effective on 19th October
2017.
The Statement of Licensing Policy has been reviewed within the 5 year
period as on 6th April 2018, The Policing and Crime Act 2017 amended the
Licensing Act 2003 to place Cumulative Impact Assessments on a statutory
footing.
The Statement of Licensing Policy contains a section on the cumulative
impact of a concentration of licensed premises.
The proposed Statement of Licensing Policy has seen this section
amended and produced as a stand-alone document, The Cumulative Impact
Assessment. Whilst drafting the Cumulative Impact Assessment, evidence was
provided by Cambridge Constabulary supporting the current areas covered by the
special policy on cumulative impact.
The evidence also proposed a further area of Cambridge be added to the
Cumulative Impact Assessment. The map at Appendix 3 of the Cumulative Impact
Assessment highlights the area of Chesterton Road, Milton Road and Mitcham’s
Corner. The area runs along Chesterton Road from Croft Holme Lane to Ferry
Path; Victoria Avenue from the River Cam to Chesterton Road; and Milton Road
around Mitcham’s Corner and up to Springfield Terrace.
The process to start publishing a Cumulative Impact Assessment began in
August 2020 and a twelve-week public consultation took place between 31 August
2020 and 22 November 2020.
The Committee were advised that PC Metcalfe had nothing to add to the
Officer’s report. Covid had affected alcohol related crime behaviour.
The Committee made the following comments in response to the report:
i.
There was clear evidence that the Cumulative Impact
Area (CIA) was needed where indicated in the report recommendation.
ii.
Expressed concern that alcohol sales were shifting
from independent shops and pubs to supermarkets. Queried if this would bias
sales towards those who could complete the administration of the licence application
process.
iii.
Given the difficulties in controlling supermarket
off-licence sales, it was a good idea to put the CIA where indicated in the
report recommendation as people drank alcohol in the street, which could lead
to undesirable behaviour.
iv.
The CIA was an added tool to control alcohol
related anti-social behaviour, not a way to stop sales of alcohol.
In response to Members’ questions the Senior Technical Officer said the
following:
i.
If people provided sensible conditions and
applications for alcohol sales in a CIA, they would be permitted to make
off-licence sales.
ii.
Each application will be reviewed on its own
merits.
iii.
The City Council website invited people to seek
advice from the City Council and/or Police prior to making an application, so
they could be assisted as much as possible. People who did not put in well
thought out applications may attract representations (ie concerns) and so the
application would appear before committee for consideration.
The Committee:
Resolved (by 8
votes to 0) to:
i.
Consider the results of the public consultation
exercise as summarised in Appendix B of the Officer’s report and the
information provided by Cambridge Constabulary and Public Health before the
public consultation as attached to the Officer’s report as Appendix C;
ii.
Approve the proposed Cumulative Impact Assessment
attached to the Officer’s report as Appendix D. Appendix E is the current
section in the Statement of Licensing Policy on the cumulative impact of a
concentration of licensed premises.
Councillor Moore
took part in the discussion on this item but was unable to vote due to
technical reasons. She expressed support for the recommendation before and
after the vote.