Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
28 Ernst & Young Audit Plan 2019/20 PDF 104 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Before this item was
presented the Chair advised the minutes of 4 June (published on the website)
required an amendment for item 20/22/Civ under the recommendation iii
(additional text underlined, deleted text struck through) which both the
Chair and Opposition Spokes had been consulted on.
iii.
Delegate to the Chair of the meeting and in consultation with the Opposition Spokes to approve any amendments
to the Statement of Accounts arising from remaining audit procedures, provided
that these do not have a material impact on the Council’s reserves or result in
any changes to the Auditor’s report opinion.
Resolved
unanimously to note the
change.
The committee
received a report from the external auditor which summarised their approach to
the audit of the financial statements and value for money (VFM) conclusion for
2019/20. The plan also highlighted what EY considered to be the most
significant audit risks.
In response to
Members’ and the Independent Person’s questions, the Head of Finance, Head of
Shared Internal Audit Service and Deputy Head of Finance said the following:
i.
Investment
properties made up a large proportion of the balance sheet and was an area of
risk highlighted by the auditors. Due to
the effects of Covid-19 it will be difficult to give the normal level of
assurance on the valuations regarding the investment properties.
ii.
The
review of the valuations of properties had shown that COVID-19 had not had the
same impact on dwellings as it had on retail; therefore, the valuation
methodology on the dwellings side had not seen significant changes.
iii.
There
had been a further decrease in the valuation on dwellings based on the national
house price index which had been used by the valuers to base their opinions,
therefore there would be a small decrease similar to that of 2018/19.
iv.
Discussions
had taken place with the valuers to ensure that the same audit issues did not
occur as last year; checks were in place to make sure the relevant documents were
up to date to support their judgements.
v.
The
valuations of investment property are more volatile with valuers typically
forming their opinion on values based on the capitalisation of future income
streams. Therefore, the valuers had formed their opinion on the impact that
COVID-19 had by reducing the rental income expectations, by between three to
six month lost rent.
vi.
There
would be no impact on the council’s useable reserves because of the decreases.
vii.
More
confident this year there was enough resources in the finance team to manage
the budget and the audit simultaneously, although there was concern there was
not much room between the two deadlines.
viii.
Currently
the finance team were on course to meet the July deadline but were doing so
using all the hours available.
The Associate
Partner of Ernst and Young and the Manager of the audit said the following:
i.
EY had
recognised the need for continuity within their audit team for the council
which was part of the reason for a split visit in August and then in October /
November. Two members of staff had been
retained from the 2018/19 audit to work on the 2019/20 audit. There would also
be the same Associate Partner and Manager of the audit.
ii.
Confirmed
only one assessment of performance materiality level was permitted.
iii.
EY uses
2% of gross revenue expenditure on the provision of services for the council as
the benchmark for materiality.
iv.
The fee
negotiation had been discussed with officers to seek agreement but the PSAA
(Public Sector Audit Appointments) made the final decision.
v.
The last
EY tender was in 2017, since that time one audit had been completed. The bases for the increased fees was due to
an escalation in audit quality expectations, such as the rise in workloads on
the testing of valuations which was significantly different to that in 2016/17.
Resolved
(unanimously) to:
Note the contents of
the external audit plan 2019/20.