Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
15 General Fund Budget Setting Report 2021/22 to 2025/26 PDF 267 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Matter for
Decision
The Budget-Setting Report (BSR) includes the updated Corporate Plan and detailed
revenue bids and savings and capital proposals and sets out the key parameters
for the detailed recommendations and budget finalisation being considered at
this meeting. This report reflects recommendations that will be made to The
Executive on 8 February 2021 and then to Council, for consideration at its
meeting on 25 February 2021.
Decision of the
Executive Councillor for Finance and Resources
To recommend the Executive to:
i.
Approve Revenue Pressures and Bids shown in
Appendix C(b) and Savings shown in Appendix C(c).
ii.
Approve Non-Cash Limit items as shown in Appendix
C(d).
iii.
Agree that there are no bids to be funded from
External or Earmarked Funds (which would be included as Appendix C(e).
iv.
Agree any recommendations for submission to the
Executive in respect of the proposals outlined in Appendix D(a) for inclusion
in the Capital Plan.
To recommend Council to:
i.
Approve delegation to the Chief Financial Officer
(Head of Finance) of the calculation and determination of the Council Tax
taxbase (including submission of the National Non-Domestic Rates Forecast Form,
NNDR1, for each financial year) which is set out in Appendix A(a).
ii.
Approve the level of Council Tax for 2021/22 as set
out in Appendix A (b) (to follow for Council) and Section 4 [page 20 of
the BSR refers].
Note that the Cambridgeshire Police and Crime
Panel will meet by 3 February 2021 to consider the precept proposed by the
Police and Crime Commissioner, Cambridgeshire & Peterborough Fire Authority
will meet on 11 February 2021 and Cambridgeshire County Council will meet on 9
or 12 February 2021 to consider the amounts in precepts to be issued to the
City Council for the year 2021/22.
iii.
Approve delegation to the Head of Finance authority
to finalise changes relating to any corporate and/or departmental restructuring
and any reallocation of support service and central costs, in accordance with
the CIPFA Service Reporting Code of Practice for Local Authorities (SeRCOP).
iv.
Approve the revised Capital Plan for the General
Fund as set out in Appendix D(c) and the Funding as set out in Section 6, page
29 of the BSR.
v.
Note the impact of revenue and capital budget
approvals and approve the resulting level of reserves to be used to support the
budget proposals as set out in the table [Section 8, page 49 refers].
vi.
Approve the updated Corporate Plan 2019 - 2022,
attached at Appendix B.
Reason for the
Decision
As set out in the
Officer’s report.
Any Alternative
Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee received
a report from the Head of Finance.
Members of the
Executive and Spokes Councillors who did not ordinarily attend the Strategy and
Resources Scrutiny Committee joined the Committee for discussion on the budget.
In response to
members’ questions the Head of Finance confirmed:
i.
That
the quarter 3 financial management report supported the assumption in the
Budget Setting Report that the Council would have a balanced budget at the end
of the financial year.
ii.
When
the interim assessment was carried out in July a revised budget was put forward
which proposed using £2million of reserves.
iii.
Had
been through a couple more lockdowns since this period which posed additional
pressures but there had also been additional funding from Central Government.
iv.
Were
following requirements to spread the Collection Fund deficit over 3 years and currently
anticipating that only £1million of reserves would have to be used. However
they were yet to submit income compensation claims to government and go through
the reconciliation process.
S4682 Closure of Housing Cashiers [linked to
S4698 – HRA]
In response to
members questions Councillor Davey confirmed:
i.
The
Covid pandemic had provided the opportunity to look at the implications of
potentially shutting the Housing Cashiers. Wanted to offer an improved and
enhanced service. The consultation was currently on-going so they did not know
whether there would be any redundancies. Was in constant discussion with
Unions. There had been a 1% increase in arrears but did not think this was due
to shutting down offices but due to the impacts of the Covid pandemic. The
issue of poverty needed to be looked at.
S4679 Housing Enabling Officer
In response to
members questions Councillor Davey confirmed:
i.
The
post had been vacant for a few years this was why this post was being offered
up as a saving.
S4798 Selective Landlord Licensing [linked
to RI4797]
In response to members
questions the Strategic Director (SH) and Councillor Johnson confirmed:
i.
Officers
undertook a thorough investigation into this matter.
ii.
Noted
discussions which had taken place at Housing Scrutiny Committee, some elements
were clear, and some were not so clear. The feasibility study was useful as it
provided a lot of information about the private sector and as a consequence,
enforcement options could be considered.
URP 4739 Review and consideration of
possible alternative delivery models for the Arts Distribution Service
(including a stop).
In response to
members questions the Strategic Director (SH) confirmed:
i.
The
revenue pressure arose because there had been a reduction in income as a result
of the pandemic.
ii.
A
decision had not been made regarding the service and it was currently being
reviewed.
iii.
Consideration
was being given as to whether the service could be digitised.
iv.
Noted
the description of this budget could have been clearer.
CAP 4787 Market Square project
In response to
members questions Councillor Moore confirmed:
i.
The
project had been slightly delayed given the deferment of the item from
Environment and Community Scrutiny Committee in January. It was anticipated that the item would be
brought back to the March Committee. This did not prevent the bid being
included in the budget. This would not affect any future consultation. The
market needed investment and updating.
CAP 4741 Investment programme for public
toilet re-purposed property assets [linked to II4754] and S4743 Public toilet
review and policy implementation.
In response to
members questions Councillor Moore confirmed:
i.
There
were 21 public toilets in varying states of condition. The review of the public
toilets may result in closing the least used toilets and investing in the
toilets used the most. Changing Places toilets were also being considered.
CAP4740 Creation of a new boat pumping
station near or on Stourbridge Common.
In response to
members questions Councillor Thornburrow confirmed:
i.
Regular
meetings had been held with Cam Boaters and a close eye would be kept on how
much maintenance was undertaken. Would continue to have regular meetings with
the community.
II4754 New business opportunities on Parks
and Open Spaces (not event related) [ linked to CAP 4741].
In response to
members questions Councillor Thornburrow confirmed:
i.
Officers
were working closely with Ward Councillors as this would affect certain wards
more than others.
ii.
Questioned
if the open spaces could be used for education or arts and culture events.
iii.
Once
applications had been received regarding proposed new activities and these had
been assessed, Ward Councillors would be consulted prior to the proposal moving
ahead.
iv.
Wanted
any business opportunities to reduce the use of diesel. If the activity
involved food, would want this to be sustainable.
v.
Questioned
if buildings could be repurposed for example as a hedgehog hospital.
B4715 Community Seed Funding Scheme – grass
root grants and B4813 Community Grants – additional Covid related support.
In response to
members questions Councillor Smith confirmed:
i.
There
was a £30,000 uplift in funding under B4813 because of the greater use of
community grants coming through because of Covid. This funding would be
allocated through Area Committee funding. Noted that not every community group
was large enough to be able to access the Area Committee grant process.
CAP4706 Cambridge Corn Exchange –
Infrastructure improvements and upgrades.
In response to
members questions the Strategic Director (SH) and Councillor Smith confirmed:
i.
The
Council was currently gathering information on the carbon footprint of the Corn
Exchange. The boiler work needed to be carried out urgently as it was extremely
inefficient.
ii.
Before
the pandemic the Corn Exchange had been achieving high numbers of audiences.
iii.
This
was an opportune time to change the boiler as the Corn Exchange was closed
because of the pandemic. The works would be as carbon neutral as possible
iv.
Maintenance
of the boiler had been undertaken.
v.
A
report would be brought to the next Environment and Community Scrutiny
Committee to provide further detail.
The Committee
resolved by 4 votes to 0 to endorse the recommendations
The Executive
Councillor approved the recommendations.
Conflicts of
Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any Dispensations
Granted)
No conflicts of
interest were declared by the Executive Councillor.