Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
Update Report on Fendon Road/Queen Edith’s Way Roundabout
Cycling Officers to speak about Fendon
Road following September 2019 Open Forum question (minute reference 19/35/SAC).
Presentation to be followed by a question and answer session.
Minutes:
The Committee received a presentation from the County Council Group Manager - Major Infrastructure Delivery and Senior
Project Officer.
The presentation outlined:
i.
The roundabout had been delayed.
ii.
The roundabout was not expected to
be fully open until summer 2020 due to utility cables under it needing to be
re-organised and re-routed.
iii.
Queen Edith’s Way was expected to
be open ahead of schedule in the near future ie March 2020.
The Group Manager - Major Infrastructure Delivery and Senior Project
Officer said the following in response to questions from members of the public
and committee:
i.
The project costs had increased. A lot of work was
going on to strengthen project governance and reduce future issues.
ii.
£3.5m had been allocated to the general improvement
of the area. Everyone concerned had been unaware of the multitude of utility
cables under the roundabout before work started. Moving these increased costs.
iii.
The significant number of utility cables meant
these needed to be re-routed which delayed the project. Re-iterated utility
companies and the County Council were not aware chambers were located under the
roundabout. When these were discovered, utility companies (such as BT) were
able to work collaboratively with the contractors to divert cables and relocate
the chambers. As such these works were completed within a two month period
(rather than the five months that would have been required if the diversion
work had been carried out before the main works). The County Council retained a
map of utility cables etc in the project area, but it would be too resource
intensive to map these for the entire city.
iv.
The work done by utility companies would future
proof broadband in the local area by making cables more accessible and avoid
infrastructure maintenance or upgrade work in the near future. This should
benefit the community. Old water pipes had also been replaced as facilities
were upgraded near the roundabout.
v.
Utility companies will largely cover the costs of
any upgrades to their networks, but the County Council has paid for diversions
necessary as a result of the works. They were trying to recoup upfront costs
from utility companies where possible.
vi.
The County Council had undertaken all usual
preparatory work, but in some instances utility companies did not have accurate
maps of cables/pipes etc, these were only found when digging started.
vii.
£800k was estimated for the roundabout pre-work
commencing. Project costs rose to £1.8m due to the unplanned utility work.
£3.5m was allocated for all project work in the area, so the overall project
budget for a wider transport scheme/network in the area has not resulted in an
overspend. Higher than expected costs had arisen for this part of the project.
The project remained good value for money.
viii.
Consultation results led the County Council to
believe residents wanted a Dutch style roundabout. The costs were a matter of
public record. The cost/benefit analysis could be made available upon request
(except any commercially sensitive information.
ix.
The County Council Economy & Environment
Committee approved work on the roundabout in 2016. Information events were held
prior to the works so residents could find out details of the works programme,
the impact on bus services etc. In 2020 new designs for Queen Edith’s Way would
be developed.
x.
The cycle paths will be separate from the main
carriageway of the roundabout. The County Council had liaised with other local
authorities to share knowledge on how to integrate cycleways with other
infrastructure.
One member of the public encouraged the
Greater Cambridge Partnership and County Council to produce a Draft
Cambridgeshire Cycle Guide, based on Oxfordshire’s.