Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
64 19/0469/FUL - 101 Perse Way PDF 165 KB
Minutes:
The Committee received an application for
full planning permission.
The application sought approval for the change of use to an 8 bed (10
person) HMO (sui generis), together with erection of two-storey side and rear
extension, single-storey front and rear extensions, rear roof extension, and
detached cycle store in rear garden.
The Planning Officer referred to an amendment contained in the amendment
sheet.
The Committee received a representation in objection to the application
from a local resident.
The representation covered the following issues:
i.
Did not object to people extending
their properties but this development was solely for profit.
ii.
There could potentially be 10
vehicles at the property, so parking could be an issue. Questioned where the
vehicles would be park.
iii.
Commented that plans did not show
the children’s play area and noted that existing resident’s parked on a public
footpath.
The Committee:
Resolved (by 5 votes to 0) to grant the
application for planning permission in accordance with the officer
recommendation, for the reasons set out in the officer report, and subject to
the conditions recommended by the officers.