Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
53 Local Government Ombudsman Case ID 18005464 Decision PDF 284 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Matter for
Decision
The LGO upheld a complaint relating to the application of the Council’s Moorings
Policy.
Decision
of Executive Councillor for Finance and Resources
i.
Noted that LGO had upheld a complaint relating to
an unauthorised mooring;
ii.
Noted that the Head of Legal Services as the
Council’s Monitoring Officer had an obligation to report the findings to the
Council
iii.
Noted that the Committee was satisfied with the
action that had been taken (detailed in section 6 of the officer’s report)
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee received a report from the Development Manager.
In response to the report Councillors queried what the council had failed
to do.
The Development Manager said the following in response to Members’
questions:
i.
There were delays in the consideration of this case
due to the complexity of the issues involved. The Local Government Ombudsman
felt the Council did not consider the individual’s circumstances in a timely
way.
The Committee unanimously resolved to endorse the recommendations.
The Executive Councillor approved the recommendations.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor
(and any Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest
were declared by the Executive Councillor.