Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
34 A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet Preferred Route consultation PDF 382 KB
Minutes:
Matter for
Decision
The purpose of the report
was to inform Cambridge City Council’s response to the current A428 Black Cat
to Caxton Gibbet Detailed Alignment consultation, by setting out response
points to inform discussion and agreement of key issues to inform a full
response being agreed by the Executive Councillor in an out of cycle decision in consultation with Chair and Spokes and submitted ahead of the
consultation deadline.
Decision
of Executive Councilor for Transport and Community Safety.
i.
Noted the key response points to the A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet
Preferred Route consultation.
ii.
Agreed the wording of a final joint response and/or any individual
response published through an out of cycle decision, in consultation with Chair
and Spokes.
Reason for the Decision
As
set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative
Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee
received a report from the Principal Planning Policy Officer.
The report set out
key response points for discussion, to be refined following the meeting.
Discussion with South Cambridgeshire District Council suggests that there is
potential to include Cambridge’s comments within a joint response, potentially
also with other partners.
In response to Member’s comments and questions the Principal Planning
Policy Officer said the following:
i.
The preferred choice for the Oxford to Cambridge
arc would go either via Cambourne or Bassingbourn entering Cambridge via the south.
ii.
The draft response would expand on the different
projects undertaken by the Greater Cambridge Partnership schemes and the impact
on the city acknowledged.
Following a general discussion the Committee noted the critical
importance of the A428 being considered as part of a coherently planned local
and regional transport network, that of necessity should interact and integrate
with capacity being provided elsewhere.
The Committee unanimously
endorsed the Officer recommendations
The Executive Councillor
approved the recommendations.
Conflicts of Interest
Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest
were declared by the Executive Councillor.