Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
47 Jesus Green Lido Improvements PDF 234 KB
Report to follow
Minutes:
Matter for
Decision
A range of
investigatory work was being undertaken at the Jesus Green Lido to consider
current issues, future requirements and options to achieve these. This includes
investigative work and structural assessment of the current buildings and pool
tank along with potential investments required to maintain them for either
their continued use or provide replacement facilities.
Decision
of Executive Councillor for Communities
i.
Approved the phased approach
outlined in this report to implement short term and consider longer term
improvements to Jesus Green Lido.
ii.
Approved, subject to business case
approval, the use of all remaining S106 developer contributions collected under
the ‘swimming pool’ contribution type for eligible improvements at Jesus Green
Lido proposed in this report. This includes unallocated swimming pool S106
contributions already received and those received in future.
iii.
Agreed to de-allocate £250,000 of
generic S106 contributions from the Jesus Green Rouse Ball Pavilion project, so
that these funds can, instead, be made available for other projects to mitigate
the impact of development in Cambridge (that is, £125,000 back to community
facilities S106 funds and £125,000 back to outdoor sports S106 funds).
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee received a report from the Sport & Recreation Manager.
The Sport & Recreation Manager said the following in response to
Members’ questions:
i.
Phase 1 will continue and not be reported back to
committee. Anything concerning phase 2 would come back to committee for
consideration.
ii.
Project phase two: Officers would liaise with
stakeholders to identify possible options and additional investments to improve
the facility, and considered as part of the new leisure contract offer from
October 2023 onwards. Any future proposals would also require approval from
both elected members and planning permissions.
The Committee unanimously resolved to endorse the recommendations.
The Executive Councillor
approved the recommendations.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any Dispensations
Granted)
No conflicts of interest were declared by the Executive Councillor.