Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
25 2019 S106 Priority-Setting (Play Areas and Open Spaces) PDF 379 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Public Speakers
Catherine Rowland and Linda Frost addressed the Committee in support of
the Consort
Way play area boundary fencing and made the following comments:
·
Spine Road traffic was
fast moving.
·
An unfenced play area left
children vulnerable to moving vehicles.
·
Signage in the area was
inadequate and did not prevent dogs or cyclists from using the area.
·
Older children use the
play area to play football.
·
30mph signs had recently
been erected in the area and local people were current engaged in getting this
reduced to 20mph.
·
Fencing was needed
urgently to prevent an accident.
Executive
Councillor Response:
Councillor Thornburrow thanked the speakers for their comments and
undertook to ask the County Council for their comments. She would also ask
officers to consider this item as a priority.
Matter for
Decision
The Council uses S106 contributions paid by developers to
mitigate the impact of developments on facilities and amenities in Cambridge.
In line with the arrangements agreed by the Executive Councillor in March 2019,
the Council had invited proposals for improving play areas and open spaces within
the city as part of its 2019 S106 funding round. Thirty applications had been
received and assessed against the S106 selection criteria. The report
summarised those applications and assessments and made 17 recommendations for
S106 funding.
Decision
of Executive Councillor for Planning Policy and Open Spaces
Resolved:
i.
to allocate S106
funding to the following projects, subject to business case approval (see
Section 4 and Appendix A of the Officers report for project details).
|
|
S106 funding types |
|
|
Project |
Play provision |
Informal open space |
N01 |
Logan’s Meadow: provide more benches and
bins |
- |
£7.5k |
N02 |
Bramblefields
local nature reserve: more planting |
- |
£7.5k |
N05 |
Arbury Court play area improvements
(landscaping & equipment) |
£15k |
£15k |
N07 |
Jubilee Gardens: improved access,
landscaping, planting and seating |
- |
£40k |
N08 |
Chestnut Grove Play Area: benches and bins |
- |
£7.5k |
E07 |
Robert May Close play area: new play
equipment and the replacement of two park benches |
£5k |
£35k |
S01 |
Cherry Hinton Hall play area improvements:
including accessible play equipment, plus landscaping |
£90k |
£60k |
S02 |
Holbrook Road play area improvements
(additional equipment and extra bench) |
£46k |
£1k |
S03 |
Nightingale Avenue Rec Ground: new all-weather
footpath between car park and community garden |
- |
£15k |
S05 |
Consort Way play area (Trumpington
Meadows): boundary fencing |
- |
£30k |
WC1 |
Jesus Green ditch: landscaping and
biodiversity improvements |
- |
£53k |
WC2 |
Jesus Green: new wildflower meadow |
- |
£18k |
WC3 |
Jesus Green: ecological/ educational space |
- |
£7k |
WC4 |
Jesus Green barbecue area (and associated
signage) plus drinking water fountain |
- |
£12.5k |
WC5 |
Midsummer Common Community Orchard: drinking
water fountain |
- |
£2.5k |
WC6 |
Sheep’s Green local nature reserve:
biodiversity bank improvements at Mill Pond |
- |
£22k |
X01 |
Biodiversity enhancements (e.g. ‘Bee
banks’) at parks in in East Chesterton, Coleridge, Trumpington & Market |
- |
£5k |
E01 |
Thorpe Way Rec Ground:
new footpath |
|
£15k |
S04 |
Nightingale Avenue Rec community garden:
accessible polytunnel |
|
£1.5k |
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee received a report from the Development Manager.
The Development Manager said the
following in response to Members’ questions:
i.
The needs of elderly residents would be considered when
benches were installed in Logan’s Meadow and other sites and benches with arms
would be used where possible.
ii.
Wheelchair user’s needs would be taken into account
when drinking water facilities were installed.
iii.
The budget allocation for the water fountain
included wider costs such as officer time and any consultation work needed.
iv.
Confirmed that lighting costs had been removed from
a number of projects as S106 funding could only be used for capital cost and
not on-going maintenance or utilities charges. This could be reconsidered at a
later date for other funding sources.
v.
Requests for litter bins that had been unsuccessful
could be directed to alternative funding streams such as the next round of
Environmental Improvement Projects.
vi.
Confirmed that the definition of Informal Open
Spaces for S106 purposes related to soft landscaping. Public Realm funding
might be available for hard surfaces areas.
vii.
Confirmed that the S106 pot was diminishing and
that officers were endeavouring to make the most positive contribution with the
reduced funds.
Members were disappointed that the £50,000
Informal Open Spaces funding for Chesterton Recreation Ground was being
withdrawn. Officer’s confirmed that the funding for this project was not time
sensitive and suggested deleting this recommendation to allow further
consultation work to be completed.
The Committee unanimously resolved to delete recommendation (i)
De-allocate £50,000 of informal
open space S106 funding for previously prioritised
project for a skate park at Chesterton Recreation Ground (see paragraph 3.9);
The Committee unanimously resolved to
endorse the recommendation (ii):
to allocate S106 funding to the
following projects, subject to business case approval (see Section 4 and
Appendix A of the Officers report for project details).
The Executive Councillor
approved the recommendations.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any
Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest
were declared by the Executive Councillor.