Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
31 Greater Cambridge Waste Service PDF 277 KB
Minutes:
Matter for
Decision
The Officer’s report provided a summary of the progress and performance
for the Greater Cambridge Shared Waste Service (GCSWS) during 2018/19.
The principle of producing a single Annual Report for the shared
services was agreed at committee in July 2015. The overarching Annual Report
for the Greater Cambridge Shared Services covers the Waste, Planning and
Internal Audit services, but only the Waste Service falls under this
Committee’s remit and therefore the service report has been extracted and
included in the Officer’s report.
Decision
of Executive Councillor for Climate Change, Environment & City
Centre
Noted the contents of the Officer’s report.
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee received a report from the Head of GCSWS.
The Head of GCSWS said the following in response to Members’ questions:
i.
The recycling rate was the amount of waste recycled
out of the total amount collected. This was based on the Defra national weight
based scheme.
ii.
It was not possible to identify recycling rates for
different city wards, but information could be broken down into amounts of dry
or organic waste. It may be possible to identify a daily recycling rate in
future.
iii.
Seasonal variance affected recycling rates shown on
P36 of the agenda. The amount of organic waste collected affected the variance.
iv.
Officers did not recommend amending the recycling
target although it had been met. Seasonal variances would affect if a target
was met or not.
v.
Giving people bin collection options had stopped
contamination of recycling materials with low quality waste.
vi.
50% was the national recycling target. The Shared
Waste Service had exceeded these despite a change in the waste service in 2017.
The European Union target was higher. Officers expected the national and EU
targets to rise to 65% in future, which would impact on Shared Waste Service
targets.
vii.
The City Council was in the top quartile of
recycling rates when compared to other cities. Some other city’s recycling
rates were higher, but others were lower.
viii.
Central Government were expected to develop a 25 year
waste strategy in the next 12-15 months. Officers recommended making no change
to recycling rate targets until the Strategy was published.
The Committee unanimously resolved to endorse the recommendation.
The Executive Councillor
approved the recommendation.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any
Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest
were declared by the Executive Councillor.