Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
19 S106 Funding for Streets and Open Spaces Portfolio: Next Steps PDF 158 KB
Report to follow
Minutes:
Matter for
Decision
Off-site S106 contributions
paid by developers help to mitigate the impacts of their developments on local
amenities. They are based on legal agreements and have to be used in line with official
regulations. S106 funding availability is more limited than it once was and is
unevenly spread across the city. Official regulations highlight the need to
make a distinction between generic S106 contributions and specific ones. The
Council uses ‘target lists’ as a starting point for negotiating play area and
open space specific contributions.
The Officer’s report set
out the process for future generic S106 funding rounds for play area and open
space improvement projects.
Generic S106 funding rounds
can only seek project proposals from wards where S106 funding is available
locally.
The report also highlighted
plans to commission a public art project close to Trumpington’s
boundary with Petersfield and Coleridge, in order to make timely use of a nearby,
time-limited public art contribution.
Decision
of Executive Councillor for Streets and Open
Spaces
Agreed:
i.
The arrangements for annual, generic S106 funding
round for play areas and open spaces as long as there is sufficient, generic
S106 funding available (paragraphs 4.1-4.5 of the Officer’s report).
ii.
That, where there is less than £10,000 of
unallocated, generic play area and/or informal open space S106 funding
available in a ward, this can be used to supplement spend on appropriate local
projects identified for specific S106 contributions or via the Environmental
Improvement Programme (for projects approved by the Executive Councillor for
Streets and Open Spaces) (see paragraph 3.10 of the Officer’s report);
iii.
To return decision-making over the use of generic
play area and informal open space S106 funding to the Executive Councillor,
while maintaining opportunities for all ward councillors to comment on
proposals from their part of the city (see paragraphs 4.6-4.7 of the Officer’s
report);
iv.
To instruct officers to develop proposals for a
public art commission (with a budget of between £50,000 - £75,000) in
Trumpington ward or close to its boundary with Petersfield and Coleridge wards
and report back to this Committee later in 2019 (see paragraph 4.8 of the
Officer’s report).
v.
To instruct officers to make all city councillors
aware of the evidence-based target lists for play areas and open spaces that
are used as a starting point for negotiating specific S106 contributions (see
paragraph 5.7 of the Officer’s report).
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee received a report from the Urban Growth Project Manager.
The Urban Growth Project Manager said the following in response to
Members’ questions:
i.
S106 funding contributions had to be used for its
intended purpose. Monies could not be moved from one contribution type to
another.
ii.
As resources ran down, it was recommended to return
decision-making over the use of generic play area and informal open space S106
funding to the Executive Councillor; alongside input from ward councillors, to
make the best use of resources available to deliver projects.
iii.
Funding would be allocated through steps set out on
page 62 of the Officer’s report. Ward councillors were encouraged to comment on
the proposals received (see page 64).
iv.
Proposed to put information about s106 funding on
the council website.
v.
A clear relation would be maintained between S106 funding
where it was from and where it would be
spent.
The Committee unanimously resolved to endorse the recommendations.
The Executive Councillor
approved the recommendations.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any
Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest
were declared by the Executive Councillor.