Council and democracy
Home > Council and Democracy > Issue
8 Cambridge City Housing Company - Review of Pilot Phase PDF 334 KB
The appendix to the report contains exempt
information during which the public is likely to be excluded from the meeting
subject to determination by the Scrutiny
Committee following consideration of a public interest test. This
exclusion would be made under paragraph 3 of Part 1 of Schedule 12A of the
Local Government Act 1972.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Matter for
Decision
The report presented the
review of the pilot phase of the Cambridge City Housing Company Limited (CCHC)
and considered whether the pilot phase should continue, the company should be moved
into business as usual, or if it should be closed.
Decision
of Executive Councillor for Strategy and External Partnerships
i. Approved that CCHC moved from its pilot phase into business as usual.
ii. Confirmed the Council’s financial support for the company, subject to ongoing review by the S151 officer.
iii. Agreed that the Council refinanced the existing loan to the company for three years at 2.02%.
iv. Supported the company directors’ recommendation that, in view of the possible market impact of Brexit, any decision on further investment was delayed until at least the final quarter of 2019/20, or until the local property market had stabilised.
v. Agreed that a third director be appointed to the company
Reason for the Decision
As set out in the Officer’s report.
Any Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Not applicable.
Scrutiny
Considerations
The Committee received a report from the Head of Finance.
The Head of Finance said the following in response to Members’
questions:
i.
It was proposed to keep the loan rate to the CCHC
despite the Bank of England confirming that it would retain current interest
rates and they would not be increasing their interest rate. The loan rate would
provide additional interest to the council but it would not be a significant
amount.
ii.
The CCHC was not advised to buy any additional
properties at the moment given the economic uncertainty with Brexit. If
properties were bought and there was a downturn in the housing market this
could bring the company to a negative equity position.
iii.
The Cromwell Road development had other objectives
and priorities.
Councillor Herbert confirmed that there was a commitment to continue the
CCHC. The company had an obligation to operate
without losing money. A range of options was contained within the confidential
appendix and based on current overheads the company could continue to
operate. There were significant
development options due to come forward in the next couple of years.
The Committee resolved:
-
unanimously to endorse recommendation 2.1
-
unanimously to endorse recommendation 2.2
-
by 4 votes to 0 to endorse recommendation 2.3
-
by 4 votes to 0 to endorse recommendation 2.4
-
unanimously to endorse recommendation 2.5
The Executive Councillor
approved the recommendations.
Conflicts of Interest Declared by the Executive Councillor (and any
Dispensations Granted)
No conflicts of interest
were declared by the Executive Councillor.